Westside
-
Posts
4,937 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Westside
-
-
Lol, whatever champ.
-
1 minute ago, StHustle said:
Many claim it but for those willing to learn based on INDISPUTABLE FACTS and not OPINION. Broken down perfectly by an intelligent white man.
Not you again!?
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, BillsFanNC said:
Given the other thread was locked, I'll repost here...
If anyone knows if DR is active on any social media platforms and is willing to share his handle(s), please send me a PM. Thanks.
Ditto
Thanks Buffal_Gal and B-man. I appreciate you keeping us informed still. You two are elite posters in my book!?
That goes for you too Hedge. I'm sorry if I missed anyone. I appreciate all you do here.
-
2
-
1
-
-
On 6/24/2020 at 11:46 AM, Tiberius said:
Economist Thomas Sowell on Monday compared the tariffs implemented during the Great Depression to President Donald Trump’s aluminum and steel duties.
“The Smoot Hawley tariffs of 1930 had a lot more to do with the Great Depression than the stock market,” Sowell told FOX Business’ Neil Cavuto on “Cavuto: Coast to Coast.” “Unemployment was nowhere near as low the first year after the stock market as it was in the first five months after those tariffs went in. During the Great Depression in the 1930s, we had trade surpluses, but it didn’t do us a bit of good.”
Earlier this month, the president announced that the United States will impose a 25% tariff on steel and 10% on aluminum. There is also speculation that the president is considering imposing broad tariffs on imports from China.
“Conceivably, a catastrophic mistake depends on how far he wants to push it,” Sowell said.
Now you believe him???
15 minutes ago, Buffalo Timmy said:You could not be more condescending to one of the most brilliant men on the planet if you tried. I used to hear him on the radio every once in a while I think he was the one who told this story. While working in DC around the year 2000 he was at a party with a bunch of DC policy wonks who were all trying to one up each other. The discussion turned to a book about economics and poverty where these liberal men all professed their understanding of the book and what it meant. At no point did they ask him his name since none of them could have cared who he was and dismissed his opinion multiple times about the point of book. At the end of the night he told the guys who dismissed him he wrote the book they were discussing and they got most of what he wanted to convey wrong. I see you being one of these dudes Tibs.
Except it would have taken place in a laundromat
-
Just now, Tiberius said:
Oh please, I’ve been banned for less. It happened. I never complained, just did my time and got on with it.
You just added a new account is what you mean.
-
1
-
-
Just now, SlimShady'sSpaceForce said:
that would fall under etc
On that I can agree 100% :LOL:
Funny how you left that out
-
Just now, SlimShady'sSpaceForce said:
Hey I like DR, but the rulz is the rulz.
If he continued down a path the Mods said step off and he didn't .. Who's to blame?
Not complaining about the rules, just the separate set of rules down here.
-
1 minute ago, SlimShady'sSpaceForce said:
LOL I find that kind of funny. just tossing out there. No 1 person is being called out
From what I've witnessed first hand with some here .... being called a Libtard, ignorant, moron, clueless etc IMO isn't quite what I call an honest discussion.
I guess being called a racist is ok in your book?
-
1
-
-
12 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:
I know some people are against using the ignore function, but I think this again calls on folks to consider using it.
I'm all for discussion with people who don't agree with me politically, but everyone can tell who the trolls are down here. These people cant/won't acknowledge even the most basic facts and just throw bombs all day based on the same old regurgitated disproven BS. These people will never take the L, so why even engage at all with them? Please do not feed the trolls.
As an aside if anyone knows if DR is on social media and can PM me his info Id appreciate it. Having his voice silenced during this critical period is shameful.
I would also appreciate any information on DR on another media site. Please PM me. TYIA
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Tiberius said:
Most informed? Oh boy
Yep, that would make the least informed puppet boy!
-
1
-
-
That's so wrong. DR was the most informed poster on this site! I was suspended for a couple days for defending myself against a horde of angry liberals on here. I guess it's only ok if you're a liberal. So much for a neutral message board. SMH
-
1
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, Tiberius said:
lol, no, it's you that does not understand. Reagan did! Medicare is socialism too.
Ok champ. Whatever you say.
-
1 minute ago, Koko78 said:
I'm very impressed with her, but I do not see her becoming a GOP leader in the next 4 years. For all she brings to the table (which is a lot), she has no actual political experience. Trump got away with having no experience because he's Trump. She is not.
Now that I thought about it, I think you're right. Maybe not in the next four years, but I definitely think she could become a major player in the future.
-
I wouldn't rule out Candice Owens. She's intelligent, articulate and has great stage presence and leadership qualities for someone as young as her.
-
1
-
-
8 minutes ago, Tiberius said:
Are you on social security? That’s socialism very successful
Wow, so deep!
Social security is socialism? Lol
Shows how little you understand.
-
8 hours ago, transplantbillsfan said:
I don't understand where the posting of an article makes me wrong.
Can you explain that?
Can you post something that proves Russia didn't influence the election? Not something that says there was "insufficient evidence," but instead something that proves it.
You claim that proof exists, just provide it and this will be one of the things I admit was wrong about.
So just pull out the parts of the Mueller report, OIG report, FBI disclosures and trials that directly stated there's proof Russia had no influence on the election.
I didn't read the Mueller report and never will.
Maybe Mueller found no evidence of criminal conspiracy, but that could be because Mueller himself was impeded in his investigation by members of the Trump campaign who lied, encrypted and deleted communications, individuals providing false or incomplete info, and Trump dangling pardons in the face of people of interest like Manafort in an effort to interfere with the investigation. Those were claims by Mueller, not me.
As for collusion, Mueller's Summary of major findings at least provides several examples of what would surely be considered collusion. And that combined with an impeded investigation shouldn't lead anyone to the conclusion that Trump was proven innocent. Mueller never said that.
What is wrong about it?
I just explained it to you.
Ummm... no they didn't
Yes. Needs to be undeniably or almost undeniably proven.
It hasn't been here.
And yes, I believe there was collusion. It's clearly there. I'm not as sure about conspiracy, but sure, I'd say I believe that happened, too.
Prove it.
I know Russia hacked the Republicans, too. But the information wasn't released in any kind of damaging way as it was for Clinton.
Provide me the evidence that the Russians were equal opportunity destroyers of both Clinton and Trump. That's news to me.
Wow this I do NOT agree with.
Doesn't really seem so so far.
Here ya go. You're right.
I was dead wrong on this one. I absolutely did not think Trump would be impeached.
I really didn't think the House would end up going through with it because of political risk.
I was dead wrong about that one and will eat crow on it.
This was probably from me reading so much of you my head got twisted all around.
This post was wrong, too.
Trump certainly wasn't exonerated.
He does hold the power of the Presidency, though.
I think losing the election in November is just the first of his worries to come.
Bill Barr himself admits Trump was warned Russia was trying to meddle.
Don't see how this is incorrect.
No.
No.
No.
So much wrong with this.
No.
Trump WAS told the elections were meddling and were trying to meddle, plain and simple.
You're right. And that's why I just admitted those parts where I was proven wrong. Keep the rest of that proof coming and you'll get even more of that validation you seem to need.
For now I think you should step outside and get some Sun, though. Just some friendly advice.
We both surf a lot, you just do waaAAaaayyy too much of this:
The burden of proof is on the accuser. That is how the law is set up. If you information that no one else has, I would like to hear it. I keep an open mind. As of today, that evidence doesn't exist.
-
3
-
-
7 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:
It looks fake to me. I'm a little skeptical.
-
1
-
1
-
-
7 minutes ago, Muppy said:
lol be careful westside there are folks whom post here who will not like you thinking Im credible OR genuine. I'll try to be more evenly balanced in my posting and point out all inferences of a post like hers example of where I agree with her and disagree. I like that actually....point taken. Thanks I appreciate that I'll understand you better and in the future and vice verse.
Thank you. ?
I definitely would rather you be an allie than a foe.?
-
1 minute ago, SectionC3 said:
Hoax. I simply repeated a freshly-uttered Trumpism. I’m sorry to learn that you think the trumpism is weak, at that its utterer by extension also is weak. This is a point on which we can agree: Trump is a low-energy, weak, sad loser. I’m glad that after all of our discourse we found common ground on this important point!
I believe we would find common ground on many things. Just not what you said. I'm a very reasonable person. I don't let politics run my life. I'm sure we would get along just fine if we met. ?
Just now, Muppy said:for goodness sake man just because a person doesnt post about each and every topic in a chat forum doesnt equal an opinion one way or the other. come on....do I seem like the kind of person who is going to applaud vandalism destruction of property, looting, etc etc etc and Must I post my every thought and displeasure to actually feel those are wrong? Or post in every thread for that matter? absolutely not.
No, you do not seem like the type of person who would approve of such behavior. That's why I think you should speak up against it. You have a lot more credibility than tibs and his alts. Believe it or not, I actually respect your opinion. Your denouncement would go a long way in putting a stop to such despicable behavior.
-
1
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, Muppy said:
she said it was OKAY,...,its clearly not its unlawful and despicable........right? or are you going to argue that too.....
I agree it's unlawful and despicable. I just didn't wish it took a you lady on social media to finally speak out about it. I didn't hear a single peep by the left when it's happening, but as soon as someone speaks out about it, it becomes unlawful and despicable. I just wish you were more consistent.
-
2
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, SectionC3 said:
So now you think Trump is weak? Duly noted, Creepster.
Trump? No, your attempt to insult me was weak. But you already knew that AC. ?
-
1 minute ago, Muppy said:
what on earth are you talking about neither of those things I stated are True unless you want to fan an agenda..up is down and down is Up Unbelievbale
Churches haven't been vandalized or set on fire? Really margarita? They are talking about tearing down statues of Jesus!
Everything that intelligent young woman said was true. If you don't agree with it, that's your prerogative. But feelz aren't facts. Be better margarita. You're one of the more moderate Democrats on here.
-
Just now, Muppy said:
stating that burning down churches is okay thats one, saying she has to apologize for standing for the national anthem another....Both absurd to the point of ridiculous..fan those flames baby girl
So, you can't refute them. All you have are feelz? You can and usually do better than this margarita.
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, SectionC3 said:
Hoax. You need to check Donald Trump’s twitter. He said it, not me. “Washed up Creepster” is such a great turn of phrase!
Good point. It is after noon, meaning that it’s acceptable to be drunk by now.
Actually it's pretty weak. You can do better AC.
-
1
-
Slavery Ended 150 years ago. GET OVER IT!
in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Posted
I know who you are!! Your cornpop!!! Bidens buddy!