daz28

Legitimate legislative purpose. The democrats have done the same things, too.

I think what he's saying is it good enough to take us all the way. Anything less isn't good enough.

I agree there will likely be a reckoning(here at least) if what you think is right is indeed correct.

They beat us by 25, so I get it. I also get we're healthier now.

Did you forget about Ken Starr? The first and second red scares, which are relevant to THIS DAY?? I'm with you that Bragg trumped-up charges, but that's hardly unique in history, and was quickly followed up with unconstitutional investigations and trumped-up charges on Hunter Biden. Let it be noted, that none of this is about truth or justice, and that rarely does anyone face any consequences, besides the political hits. It's all political theater for the weak-minded partisan masses to devour. Mike Pence disagrees with you.

A complete mess of ignorant sheep listening to and responding exactly how they want them to. If you think your DaYdUh isn't available in thousands of places on the internet for purchase, then you're a poor ignorant bastard. Not one single one of those sellers is asking what country you're purchasing that information for or why. Furthermore, all airwaves and such are and have been spewing their preferred propaganda to you since man first drew a figure in the dirt. I prefer to be able to discern what is propaganda myself, because I'm free. Go ahead and throw me a few laughing emojis and flame away, because you've once again been given the facts. 🙈🙉🙊🐑

At no point did WAS slow down or try to protect a lead. Hope McD was watching.

Psht!

Why didn't they snap it fast?

Horrible routes

Looks like we're gonna see sacks.

Extra down every time this series.

Same game diff day

Need a massive Noonan miss from Harry Butt.

Needing a t/o now, unless Butker misses

4th and short at worst

If he had of kept rolling right it looks like he had a receiver coming back

I agree that they have botched the whole classified documents thing, going back to Hillary servers and before that. Having independent special counsels to gather facts, or what they consider to be, is the best thing they've done. Completely pissed that there are efforts to keep those reports from the people, so they can make up their own minds, is a problem that isn't being discussed. How they handle prosecutions is one thing we can judge. How they handle the information, and if we're allowed to access it is another. Right after removing all the fact checkers on social media was praised, this is how they reacted to this: In a letter to Garland, Trump's lawyers said the dropped charges were a "complete exoneration" of the president-elect. They called the release of Smith's report "imprudent and unlawful" and said it would "perpetuate false and discredited accusations.” Thanks guys, but I'd like to make that decision myself, based on the report, rather than take your word for it.

So you're against independent special counsel gathering facts, and the president keeping his nose out of it??? Cool story bro. As for the mandate, landslide, and "skunking", they have a 2 man lead in the House, 3 man adv in Senate, and a roughly 1% average win in three states that could have swung the presidential election. Keep repeating clear blatant misinformation, because that's how they REALLY barely won.

Uh, You're not even allowed to call anyone partisan as a bad word. Your name alone disqualifies your judgement on such matters. As for the meat and potatoes here, you conveniently left out the all-important 'FOX'S COVERAGE' part. Need an example? Instead of them saying 'report released, here's a link decide for yourself', their headline was: "Jack Smith report grilled as 'partisan' lawfare attempt: 'Prosecution on paper'". Certainly, no bias there, huh? Nope, I have a clear understanding that both political parties have their own media to slant the 'news'.

so you think Fox's reporting won't be changing drastically now that the GQP is in charge? If you love talk about infrastructure week discussions and concepts of concepts of plans, you'll love it. They do have to be sure to give their viewers a healthy plate of hate, fear, and outrage though. You know for a fact that people are easily led by partisan outlets, but I'm a clown for bringing it up??? CNN will pivot back to every dumb thing trump says, if I need to play that game with you. Dude, your NAME is partisan.

Show me the "excuses" I made for anyone? I expect NC to make stuff up, but I expect better from the other posters. I'm not a democrat, so how do I "look silly". The topic I'm debating is the outrage at the wildfires, that suddenly appeared after trump won. Everything on Fox will be hunky dory for 4 years, except for the stuff that happens in blue states. There will be no caravans, no inflation or gas prices, etc. It's all a joke of a game, and sadly I think you understand this, but still feel compelled to defend it. Nice projection though. That was to dispute, I believe Orlando's, idea that they weren't "doing enough". I have no idea if he's doing a good job on wildfires, because I wouldn't know the first thing about climate as it relates to fires, and what measure are the best bang for the buck. You, Fox news and all the right wingers won't admit that though. Orange man bad=Newsom bad

Where have I defended Newsom? Pointing out an obvious hit job isn't defending anyone, but it's hard to be told when you're the puppet. I get that. This is page 120(2018) of this thread, and you'd be hard pressed to find any wildfire comments up till now. I see fascist behavior, and it's concerning. Do you think Putin is mad that we have a massive divide in our country based on 2 ideologies, which have their own "news" organizations? Well he's not, but we should be.

Is that what you extrapolated from "he's pretty spry considering he's 82"? When you lose your mind over what is clearly an undisputable comment like that, it only shows how desperate you are to try to win ANY debate. Go to a nursing home, and see what 82 year old are like. They don't work all day and fly all over the globe.

Despite paying the highest taxes, Californians have to rely on their own pool water. The cost of voting Democrat.