Jump to content

delirious

Community Member
  • Posts

    843
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by delirious

  1. 3 minutes ago, JoPoy88 said:


    the question seems pretty pertinent this year though doesn’t it? Considering this team finally, after twenty years, looks like one on the brink of actually competing for something and attracting one or two key free agents could be a big part of pushing them over the top?

     Or if we lose in the first round again it will be pertinent again because "are we really a few players away?". Or if we don't make the playoffs it will be pertinent because "are we back to the same old bills?". I can create tons of excuses why it would be pertinent. 

  2. 1 minute ago, JoPoy88 said:


    it’s superbowl week, where many, many players are congregated in the same space, i.e. a perfect and relatively easy time for a good reporter to get a broad view from a large sample of players on a subject. Don’t like it don’t read it. Or just whine about it. Choice is yours.

    Or how about stop rehashing this idea year after year? 

  3. 13 minutes ago, Buffalo716 said:

    Hypothetically it sounds like a great idea but generally the best players don't make good coaches

     

    There are a laundry list of reasons why but Luke being a great player doenst guarentee he will be a great coach

     

    That's where Bob Babich would come in my opinion.  Let Babich do the brunt of the coaching while letting Kuechly learn the ropes - while also giving Tremaine and Milano (Dodson?) some pointers.  Could see a situation similar to how Kyle was giving Ed Oliver pointers - except Kuechly would be an assistant coach.

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Awesome! (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...