Capco

Most of the time it’s before the 15 second mark, meaning it’s daboll making the call.

Koala koala!

Haha good call Dabes

If the Ravens go up by two scores their defense is going to pin their ears back every single play. I wouldn’t be surprised if they played cover 1 for the majority of snaps.

Oh Jerry...

Damn...

70 yards to pay dirt.

Nice sack.

They are the only ones doing a damn thing right now.

These guys are open...

Yup. It isn’t rocket science even if trajectories are involved.

Considering their field position, 3 on that drive is a win.

Ravens are completely selling out on the long ball and if Josh can’t hit those the rest of the offense is screwed. I agree that it’s on Josh.

Wow what an awful punt. That’s points for the Ravens.

Ravens are going to dare them to pass all game.

Not bad. Offense needs to string some plays together. Don’t play afraid.

Weird. Not only did I not get that ad, but I didn't even get the same number of results. About 39,500,000 results (0.60 seconds)

Seriously though, there's several ways to look at it. 1.) It's a lot less wordy. Maybe they were trying to trim the length a bit? That's kinda weak sauce since the whole article is somewhat lengthy, but I'm never been an editor so I have no idea what the standards are. 2.) It omits the slight dissent of the 3rd professor from the other two by categorizing them all as offering testimony "bolstering the Democrats' case". 3.) It omits the direct quotes from all 3 professors who support impeachment in some form and if read at face value are particularly damaging to Trump. They could have just as easily been trying to remove bias as insert it.

Kind of weird... but right before I posted this snippet, the article was edited at 10:08 AM to remove and replace the above lines with the following: Three leading legal scholars testified Wednesday to the House Judiciary Committee that Trump’s attempts to have Ukraine investigate Democratic rivals are grounds for impeachment, bolstering the Democrats’ case. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/pelosi-gives-approval-for-drafting-impeachment-articles-against-trump I had the page open in my tabs for a while and never refreshed it, so the original was still there for me to copy/paste at 10:29 AM. Why do you think they changed it?

Another topic for another time and one I think we'd share a lot of common ground on. I gotta run to lunch with the old man but either way it's always nice chatting back and forth. You have a good one (and same to everyone else).

Oh idk, because an original thought isn't always necessary as part of a supporting argument? I mean I get the slight you're trying to send but... yeah lol. You go ahead and keep on thinking you are the one with all the answers while you try to portray the experts as holier-than-thou. Oh boy.

West Point and the Army Corps of Engineers were instrumental to the building of infrastructure in the early days of the nation. Without those engineers the nation develops much slower. You also saw a huge boom as a result of R&D during WWII. I mean I was just quoting someone else when I said that it was a pillar on par with the military. Not even an original idea or anything.

See, rhetoric like this I find concerning. The higher institutions of education in this country are one of its central pillars, on par with the military. There's a reason why people around the world come here in droves to attend our universities. On some level it feels like people are being conditioned to discredit experts simply because those experts have conclusions they disagree with. Expertise and specialized roles are very important to a high functioning society. No one single person can become an expert in every field, and this idea that any person can do all their own research and come to more accurate conclusions than people who have focused on this one single field for a lifetime is for the birds. You can't expect every single person to be a doctor and lawyer and physicist and nutritionist and farmer and hunter and mechanic and plumber and tailor and shipwright and the hundreds of other specialized roles that feed off of each other. That's why we lean on other people's expertise on a daily basis. Scientific advancement would come to a crawl without collaboration between researchers, for example. But to lean on experts requires trust, and that trust is being actively eroded from without while those very same people eroding that trust claim that it is the institution itself that is eroding from within. If we need to have a conversation about reforming parts of higher education, that's fine. But what we're seeing instead is a wholesale dismantling of the respect and trust in that institution. That's what should alarm you.

Right I got that. All good. This whole tangent on insanity is DC Tom's fault anyway. Let's just blame him.

So you really think those three law professors are insane?