-
Posts
4,569 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by ChiGoose
-
Sinema switches to independent, shaking up the Senate
ChiGoose replied to ALF's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
I would be genuinely shocked if that happens. Seems incredibly unlikely. -
Does it make you feel good to put words in my mouth? To make things up and attribute them to me? Do you sit at home, thinking about me? Wondering how you can get me to react to you? You seem to be infatuated with me, some random person on the internet you don’t actually know. It’s kinda sad, buddy. I hope you find some meaning in your life, but given the braindead posts you put up here, I’m not sure you could even manage to tie your own shoes to get outside and touch some grass. Be careful you don’t trip on them and fall. If you posted something of value on this site, it’d be a first.
-
Sinema switches to independent, shaking up the Senate
ChiGoose replied to ALF's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Looking forward to Sinema’s new job at Fox News in 2024. -
Also answered by just reading a couple of pages. If you don’t believe me, you could also check out the Senate report, signed off on by chair Marco Rubio. You can’t unring that bell. Hillary had a reputation as a lifelong politician with questionable relationships and had spent most of the campaign under investigation. I’m not sure how much Comey clearing her actually mattered to the public. It certainly didn’t sway most of PPP.
-
I did not say that. Russians ran an influence operation and the Trump campaign welcomed it and sometimes cooperated. How effective it actually was is up for debate. If there was a solitary thing that changed the outcome (and I’m not sure there was), it’d be James Comey violating FBI protocol a few days before the election to announce another Clinton investigation.
-
My takeaway is that most of the people on this thread have terminal online brain, don’t understand how things work, and eagerly jump on anything that makes them feel good or smart. I don’t want to defend Twitter. Twitter has problems, all social media sites do, but I’m hardly convinced by people being outraged that a political campaign (not the government) flagged non-consensual sexual content for review. Content moderation is hard and everybody is going to screw it up, no matter how hard they try not to. But maybe the reason that conservatives tend to face moderation more is simply because they’re just lying more.
-
I mean, you’re not seeing that. You’re just seeing a company trying to figure out content moderation and making mistakes. But the fever swamps will see what they want to see because the only reason they aren’t recognized for their obvious greatness must be because powerful forces are working against them.
-
My point was that nuking a story is worse than allowing it but not amplifying it. I made no claims about the quality of the fact checking itself as it was irrelevant to the point I was making. You did the whole “just asking questions” cowardly BS about the vetting instead of just expressing your own position, and then pretended it was a good faith debate instead of just the childish exercise in trolling that it was.
-
Yes, Taibbi explicitly states that there was no evidence of government involvement. Basically, Twitter had a really bad moderation policy (nuke suspicious info until it’s vetted) were warned about potential election interference by the FBI, and when they saw the laptop story, they invoked their (bad) policy. This immediately backfired due to the Streisand Effect and was such a bad call that not only did a prominent Dem Congressman reach out to them to say blocking the story was bad, but they ended up reversing course within a day.
-
I agree that Fetterman isn’t recovered. I don’t think that’s a surprise. My point is that this is something someone can recover from while many on the board are acting like he’s brain dead. I’m also happy to hear you were able to recovery from your stroke and I’m sorry to hear you had to go through that.