ChiGoose

Good luck finding one in the GOP caucus. McCarthy is probably the best chance they have.

DoJ won’t indict a sitting president, so he could do all the crimes he wanted and they wouldn’t indict him. The solution, as pointed out by Mueller, would be impeachment. That’s a political process, not a legal one, so no matter the facts, there was no chance of success.

It’s not, so they don’t. And that poorly reasoned drivel is exactly what I expected from The Federalist.

I don’t understand how this didn’t get kicked out because Trump promised to release his tax returns and that was like 6 years ago so I’m assuming he’s already done it, right?

I think it’s more likely than not that he’s indicted on the NARA-Lago case. It’s pretty clear cut. Not sure on the timing though.

Well, we didn’t. That’s why. “But there is nothing in the Constitution or federal law that says the winner must be determined in the hours immediately after the polls close. And for much of American history, that would have been impossible.The outcome of many presidential elections remained unresolved for days, weeks and — in one case — months.

I love the idea that you can just decide not to participate in a criminal investigation into your activities.

The media got the story wrong. The talking points from the usual right wing bad faith actors will also likely turn out to be wrong. The FBI is investigating Hunter and that’s good. If the GOP House wants to do an actual investigation, that’s good. If they want a show trial just to try to hurt the President, that’s bad. Probably 99% of Americans don’t care about this and the fact that it’s even a big talking point is a symptom of the fact that the GOP leadership seems to have succumbed to terminal online brain. That’s likely bad for them when trying to go up against one of the least online people in Joe Biden because the Dem talking points won’t sound like foaming mouth conspiracies from the depths of the internet. That’s good. I don’t randomly tag people in random threads but apparently you can’t keep me out of your mind. That’s weird.

Oh hey. You’re still tagging me in random threads because you have a huge crush on me. I get it, I’m pretty awesome. Basically the whole package. But I’m not interested. No idea what you’re talking about, because just like 99% of Americans, I don’t give a crap about Hunter Biden.

I have not read through the entire bill yet, but my understanding is yes. More than 40 religious institutions worked with Congress on the bill to ensure religious freedom and it ended up being endorsed by several faiths, including the Mormon Church.

That’s basically what the respect for marriage act does.

Is the Babylon Bee going to post a joke at some point?

False

I really appreciate this joke. Had a great laugh, thank you.

I encourage you to actually read the DoJ filings. In the meantime, all of this is pretty consistent with an attack on the Pelosi house when Nancy was away and security was probably lighter than usual. We have officers saying either they opened the door or the door was opened. We have DePape himself stating that Pelosi opened the door with one arm while fighting him for the hammer with the other. We have consistent testimony that both Pelosi and DePape were in the foyer (so right by the door) and that when the police entered the picture, thety were wrestling over the hammer and then there was a brief conversation before Pelosi was attacked. I'm just going to take a second to point out that I nailed the Sussman trial prediction just by looking at the filings, and I can tell you that it is incredibly unlikely that DePape was someone known to the Pelosi's (and definitely not in a romantic relationship with either of them). The facts of this case support the simplest explanation: he was a crazy person who wanted to hurt Nancy Pelosi.

Oh look, ad buyers don’t like chaos and poor partnership. Who could have thunk it?

Nah, it’s about the same. The increased violent rhetoric against the LGBT community is designed to drive violence and lone wolf attacks while providing cover for the talking heads. In the end, the goal is the same: to subjugate and even eliminate those who are different.

The GOP is happy with anti-LGBT language, especially anti trans and drag language because it activates people. It generates an emotional reaction and gets people to believe things that aren’t true and also fosters an anti-LGBT environment that may lead to stochastic terrorism. It’s all a big win for the Right. Paint anyone who seems different as “the other” and blame them for everything. Unfortunately, in this case, we are taking about people who are incredibly vulnerable. People will die because of this, but there will always be an excuse for those who pretend to be reasonable supporters of hate.

Nah, just telling it as it is. Some people just can’t understand simple reason and logic.

“I don’t understand why gay people would support them Dems when decent people like us want them to be gunned down in the streets.” -The GOP

Because it’s a costume. What’s better, some random weeb showing up to do a sing a long with your kid or Dafft Duck showing up to do it?

I think you are making my point for me. There is a difference between late night shows aimed at adults and daytime shows for kids. If you have a bunch of people in animal costumes reading to kids, or doing sing a longs, or blowing balloons, do you think that’s the same as a furry convention?

Honestly? Probably entertaining the kids so that the parents could get a break. Having them read to is probably better than putting them in front of a TV or handing them a phone or tablet.

I honestly do not understand what you are asking. If your asking if there are “sexy” versions of Spider-Man or clowns, I regret to inform you and my internet provider that yes, yes there are. The question I have is: when you see guy in a dress, do you immediately think sex?