1ManRaid
-
Posts
3,798 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by 1ManRaid
-
-
1 minute ago, mead107 said:
Just think if there was no snow. He would have been even better.
Yeah you mean the receiver, he would have been an extra five yards down the field making the pass that much more underthrown.
-
10 hours ago, mead107 said:
Plays like this show he should be considered for starter.
An underthrown pass with the receiver already running in snow?
-
26 minutes ago, Juice_32 said:
It certainly wouldn't shock me. Hell at this point I'd expect Beane to get a 1st for him.
At this point I'd expect them to send Beans a 1st, an ownership stake, and thank you chicken wings.
-
Yeah, it was pathetic how he kept overthrowing open receivers against the Jags, killing our drives.
Oh wait, no we got rid of that guy already.
-
Cool story bro.
"Get out of MY thread." Lol what a joke get over yourself.
-
1
-
-
19 minutes ago, jr1 said:
Ha, classic Sideshow Bob.
-
Just now, fansince88 said:
"The uploader has not made this video available in your country."
Ha, that's my favorite episode.
-
1 minute ago, Green Lightning said:
IT troubles are enough to give a woodpecker a headache! I hear you. Ha, I saw what you did with that tampering line!
I assure you, any wit exhibited in the previous post was purely accidental. I am very tired.
-
I think he gets the occasional whisper of actual information, enough for him to point at his odd success as proof of his "legitimacy", but otherwise he's just a hype machine.
-
I imagine MC Aaron as the hottest Bat Mitzvah DJ this side of Missouri.
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, #34fan said:
"Even with the Browns off the market, McCarron should still have plenty of options as teams like Denver, Arizona, the New York Jets and Minnesota all figure to have quarterback needs and money to spend."
Or, you know, Buffalo.....the team that just freed up over $10M in cap space and currently have NO starting QB.
-
1
-
-
Just now, H2o said:
They have had time to talk with Preston. He seems like another guy who values himself more than the Bills value him. He's as good as gone.
Oh well. If so, we'll find more guys like Vontae who will at least act like they want to be here.
Still would like to keep Brown tho.
-
Am I the only one here who honestly expected to get a 3rd for him? (granted not the first pick of the third round)
-
2 minutes ago, Green Lightning said:
Bag of Milk was just jacked up on this trade and discussion. Everybody's good. Let's just enjoy the day it's been a hell of a good one.
I'm a little agitated from a long day of dealing with useless internet tech support. Long week of it really. Just had to power cycle my modem for the second time today on a brand new modem.
That said, no actual signs of tampering yet, nothing to see here lol.
-
Brown as a must is a given. I just can't nail down who exactly else given all the high draft picks we have to play with. Every vet center or WR for example could be offset with a quality first or second round pick.
-
1 hour ago, Bag of Milk said:
You are just slow.
I am in my 50's and my college roommate IS a current NFL agent (who has represented many ex Bills players)
He, as all other agents have been working the phones for quite awhile setting up parameters for deals
. Some...wink..wink are agreed to in principle already.
Quality of posters is low because people don't want to bother spoon feeding mouth breathers like you. Go Bills!
Jeeze, I've been called a dick on a number of occasions for my attitude, and even I think you're being a bit too much of a dick. Take the troll train elsewhere.
-
If a friend of a friend of mine overhears a coach in a private conversation say "Boy, I'd sure like to sign John Doe for $5M a year", and I happen to think Mr Doe would actually take that deal, that's not tampering on that team's part. That's just third party hearsay speculation. Nothing in that vague, unsourced tweet indicated any sort of tampering.
-
1 hour ago, BadLandsMeanie said:
It's a very good idea.
It is important to me. And it is very interesting to track all this Qb action.
1ManRaid are you one of the sort of posters who just hops in to shoot down other posters with smark alec remarks?
Don't be that.
It was honest question, don't get your panties in a twist with the random baseless assertions.
(but since you got snarky yourself...)
The rest of the list is going to be teams who aren't ours, signing players who weren't ours, what about that warrants a pin? Are we going to have a pin for every defensive tackle who gets signed? We need those too! How about the centers? The linebackers? Hey, I saw a tweet about some Raiders fan having buffalo wings for lunch, and that's related to us too because we also like wings, right? Pin that!
If I'm more interested in trades of draft picks, than you are in the trades of players, will that get pinned instead? Or is there some sort of importance hierarchy at play in determining which transactions of other teams who are not us getting pinned on a forum for a team that IS us?
(snark off)
-
Why, is it that important to us?
-
1 hour ago, TakeYouToTasker said:
You believe there is no logic to the fact that we have laws which prohibit vendors from not treating customers equally in consumer transactions, and that they might be evenly applied to situations in which vendors are looking to not treat customers differently in consumer transactions?
There's also the simple exercise of considering the logical extreme. Could a case be conceivably made (not likely to happen, but still POSSIBLE) for say a religious reason someone has to live somewhere, which happens to be outside of your "local sales area", requiring you to make an exception in their case? Yes, so that would be an unenforceable policy in the first place. It wouldn't be fair to everyone else for THAT person to be able to get tickets based on their religion when they can't. The policy could then also be abused, with anyone able to claim they live where they do for some nebulous, legally protected reason.
*edit*
Basically in many cases that kind of practice is sort of -technically- legal, but fans would have a legal argument to take them to court. This issue has come up many times in the past in other states.
http://fortune.com/2014/01/15/were-the-seahawks-and-broncos-ticket-bans-legal/
-
Huh, I was actually going to get season tickets this year because I finally have the funding to do so.
I live literally just across the border in Canada. It was nothing for me to hop over the border to watch the playoff game at Sports City Pizza Pub on Niagara Street, and then finally make the visit a couple weeks later to the original Duff's for wings. But I guess I'm not a real enough lifelong fan to make the same hop over the border for more Bills games, which I've been attending from time to time on a single game basis.
-
13 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:
I agree with the Jax or Denver prognosticators.
If money was the sole motivating factor Cleveland or the Jets would be my answer, but I have to believe Cousins wants to win, and win soon. Until they prove they are not hot messes (and I am sure there are whispers amongst players that we never hear stating who is on the rise, who is on the decline so maybe they are not as bad as they appear to me), I just do not see either of those places as a landing spot. I could be 100% wrong, but if winning is a choice-factor, I do not think I am.We made the playoffs and would have beat Jax if we had a QB that didn't keep overthrowing receivers.
-
4 minutes ago, Boyst62 said:
Yep I'm a keyboard. If your princess Canadian something something... Whatever the laws are regarding maple syrup in Canada... She doesn't understand the law of free speech. You can yell fire in a crowded theater. That is the plain and simple truth, what don't you understand?
If your friend understood law, which they probably didn't get an American Education in laws they might not know of the United States Supreme Court analogy of screaming fire in a crowded theater... But it is when you falsely scream fire that is illegal. This has been a metaphor in the championship of free speech in this country for a long time... Maybe not in make-believe Canadabut I have no idea what they do up there besides Terrance and Phillip
Oooh, I'm supposed to be shocked and insulted by your harsh words. I'm ever so sorry to question your omniscient authority on these matters. Carry on yelling at people on the internet.
-
2 minutes ago, Boyst62 said:
I called myself an idiot
Well then it sounds like your criminal prosecutor needs and education in freedom of speech.
Uh yeah, that education was called law school. She's a crown prosecutor for the Canadian government. I'm going to trust her assertion on matters of law over that of some random message forum keyboard warrior.
Ok you win.
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
I'm writing this sick in bed without my glasses. How long have you had the internet for?