Jump to content

1ManRaid

Community Member
  • Posts

    3,797
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by 1ManRaid

  1. 9 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

     

    ...I'd be satisfied with a 1-1 Pats split and a WC berth earned on our own......would be a decent accomplishment IMO.............

    We earned our WC the other year.  It isn't invalidated just because one of the games that went our way was in dramatic fashion in week 17.  It counts the same as the hundred other games through the season that affected our standing.

     

    How would a 9-7 record this year be more earned than a 9-7 record two years ago?

  2. 20 minutes ago, billsbackto81 said:

    Would love to see it. Unfortunately for us 7 of our 10 picks are 4th round and later. So if we are going to trade up back into the 1st they're gonna have to sweeten the pot. I understand ?'s are found in the later rounds every year but I can't see any team accepting what we have as payment. No way can we stay at 9 and trade back into the 1st without giving up future 2020 picks in the process.

    Hence the part about trading down from 9 to get the extra picks.

  3. 9 hours ago, billsfan89 said:

     

    It takes two to tango, which team is going to want a player so badly at pick 9 that they would be willing to trade up? I don't see a trade down being available. I think Tampa at pick 5 (A team looking to get a QB ahead of the Giants) is a great trade down place. But pick 9 not so much. 

    Maybe the Giants themselves, if Haskins is still there at 9.

  4. 3 hours ago, Clemfield2622 said:

    I don't see them moving up from 9, but certainly could move up at any other point.

     

    In fact it wouldn't shock me to see a trade down from 9 AND a trade up back into the 1st. 

    That's what I'm hoping for.  Trade down the 1st, trade up in the 2nd and 3rd.

     

    NFL.com article is already proposing as one of their "dream draft trades" to trade down with the Giants so they can get Haskins at 9, and hope there is a market for our pick so we can get better than the speculated 3rd and 4th as compensation.  Don't think I want to go down that far in the first but it's a nice idea.

  5. 21 minutes ago, gobills1212 said:

    Lol, well at least you obviously understand when people are 'trying' to be funny

    AND a strong sense of sarcasim to boot?

    Yeesh, must be fun being the new guy who keeps up with longstanding 'jokes' going all the way back to 8/18!

    Welcome!

     

    Man, you try SO hard.

     

    "New guy"...lul.

×
×
  • Create New...