Jump to content

1ManRaid

Community Member
  • Posts

    3,797
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by 1ManRaid

  1. 1 hour ago, Bangarang said:

    LaConfora said it so it definitely isn’t happening and why would the Jets do this unless they were getting a massive return?

    Why would WE do this unless we were getting a good deal?  If the Jets want to trade down so badly, let them cut us a deal on it.

     

    Works both ways.

  2. Just now, ddaryl said:

     

     

     

    its very suspicious that the news is let out the  day oof the draft.. Yes there will be legal issues if it was botched...

    I wouldn't go so far as to call it suspicious.  Maybe they just wanted that positive news fresh on GMs' minds for the draft, or they only just found out themselves.  Suspicious implies some nefarious reason for it, and I'm not really seeing a reason to see it that way.

     

    Suspicious would be hacked clips of a player smoking a bong being released hours before the draft.

  3. 12 minutes ago, ddaryl said:

    yeah if team doctors haven't verified this then its all agent speak IMO

    Clarifying a potentially serious heart condition is a hell of a lot different than leaking something like "lots of teams are looking to trade up for X player".  There's legal ramifications lying about or botching something like this.

     

    Teams also don't want to tip their hands before the draft so will generally stay quiet about these things.

  4. 6 hours ago, Turk71 said:

    team moving up pays a premium. 23 to 9 will cost them both 2nd rnd picks straight up, 1470 to get 1350. 9% premium.

    If the team moving up ALWAYS pays a premium, then it's not really a premium?  Isn't that the new normal and the calculation should be adjusted as such?

     

    It's like when a call centre is permanently "experiencing higher than normal call volumes".

    • Like (+1) 1
  5. 10 minutes ago, row_33 said:

     

    Meh, the Bills not showing up for the playoff game doesn’t help your righteous cause there...

    "Righteous cause"?  It's a basic statistical fact.  Week 17 games are no more important than week 1.  Asserting an objective truth is kind of the exact opposite of a righteous cause...

     

    But please, do tell me how a 9-7 one year is more "earned" than any other year with an identical record.  Did we benefit from teams forfeiting games just to help get us in?  Was there a "just let the Bills in already" special exception tie-breaker?  Educate me.  I could maybe buy the argument if we got like multiple games in a row at the end against teams resting starters in some fluke of scheduling, but no.

    • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...