Jump to content

KingBoots8

Community Member
  • Posts

    1,663
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by KingBoots8

  1. I think we will see QB’s playing longer for sure, so long as their skills don’t dull too much and their pay keeps pace. Location also matters- Megatron retired in his prime because the team was unwilling to either acquire talent to challenge for a title and was not willing to let him go. He was burned out and said he was done.

     

    the right QB, with the right team/ownership, and the right skills will play until the money or skills start to wilt. I expect more QB’s to keep playing, but only at a high enough level.

    • Like (+1) 2
  2. I love the PFN one but their rankings right now seem pretty outdated in my view. Franklin being ranked 42 overall when most other places have him between 20-30 is telling. I also see a ton of safeties going in early round 3 (like 5-6 usually between picks 73-88) which seems incorrect as well. Maason Smith outside of the top-100 is a pipe dream: he’s not lasting past pick 75 in my eyes.

     

    Fanspeak seems to have some issues refreshing the page or making me start over sometimes mid-draft, but I feel like those updated rankings are somewhat closer to reality, at least as far as the top-100 to 150 are concerned. Then again, those are user created and may not be very reflective of reality depending on which board you elect to use. Also, no trades without premium is no bueno. That’s where PFN is better, so long as you only take realistic compensation.

    • Like (+1) 1
  3. Back when this was a hot topic a few years ago I came up with, what I thought, was a fair and highly competitive way to do OT. Basically, each team gets at least 1 possession (with an exception I will highlight), and has to outscore their opponent following their possession. Here was my breakdown:


     

    1. If the receiving team has to punt or has a fumble/interception,  the other team only needs to kick a FG to win. Team A had 0 points, team B only needs 3.

     

    2. if the receiving team kicks a FG, the other team must put up more points on their possession. They must score a TD to win (no extra point needed). Team A has 3 points, team B needs at least 6 from a TD.

     

    3. If the receiving team gets the TD but misses the extra point or 2-point conversion, the other team needs a TD and extra point to win. Team A has 6 points, team B needs at least 7.

     

    4. If the receiving team gets a TD and the extra point, the other team must get a TD and 2 point conversion to win. Team A has 7 points, team B needs 8.

     

     

    The game ends immediately if one of the following happens:

     

    a. The receiving team gets a TD and makes a 2 point conversion - this can't be topped as far as points are concerned, so the other team will not get a possession. 
     

    b. The receiving team gives up a safety or pick-6. They had their possession and the opposing Defense scored. No need for the other team offense to take the field.

     

    I know it’s not perfect, but it seems like fun and even more exciting to watch with the stakes a bit higher.

  4. As much as I love the conversation, it’s too early to tell. Combine, interviews, and Pro Days are necessary to properly get a feel for whoever is on your big board. I’d love to say WR for sure, but it really depends who is left, who falls, and what we can see down the road.

     

    All that being said, here I go with my way-too-early thoughts: In these early stages leading up to the draft, I have started to like Brian Thomas Jr and Troy Franklin as possible WR options for us that could realistically be available. I think they have a good combo of size, speed, and playmaking ability, and if one of them is there I would feel good at this stage about drafting them.
     

    …if WR prospects start coming off the board fast and furious, and we can’t wiggle our way up in the draft, we have a decision to make: do we take a lesser prospect WR earlier than intended (I say no), do we draft for a different position of need (probably), or can we trade back a little bit, get some decent compensation, and get a few secondary talents who can probably be good with a little coaching and practice? (I say maybe, depends on compensation and who is left out there)

     

  5. Could do a lot better, could do a bit worse.

     

    i think we have enough playmakers to survive a game or two. If we had to rely on a backup for significant time the season is over and we could use the better pick in the draft.
     

    I can live with one season of suck if it meant getting talent that would be much more valuable on rookie deals. I hope we don’t ever have to, but that’s the truth of the matter

  6. He’s great at letting the teams I despise win championships. I have no clue why he can’t win in the big one - probably hubris. Kick the ball in OT. Run the ball when your OPOY is on your team. This is a Seattle vs NE level meltdown in my opinion, not Atlanta vs. NE. He tried being clever rather than being efficient in a game where he just needed to hold on and let his offense do what they do best.

     

     

  7. CMC should have won. That being said, Josh should have won if a QB had to win it. Either way, the only votes I agreed on all night were CJ Stroud getting OROY and Tom Grossi winning Fan of the Year.

  8. 1 hour ago, frostbitmic said:

    It has to be Kelce ... he's in the Super Bowl for the 4th time in the last 5 years and he's ******* the hot Billionaire.

    MVP sadly doesn’t mean “most valuable peen”

     

    • Haha (+1) 1
  9. 15 minutes ago, mrags said:

    A bunch of trade downs here. Ended up giving up a 4th and 5th in next years draft but ended up taking a haul this year in the process. 
     

    41.

    Troy Franklin

    WR Oregon

     

    60.

    Sedrick Van Pran

    OC Georgia

     

    99.

    Maason Smith

    DT LSU

     

    101.

    Khyree Jackson

    CB Oregon

     

    107.

    Jordan Jefferson

    DT LSU

     

    128.

    Jermaine Burton

    WR Alabama

     

    158.

    Zion Tupuola-Fetui

    EDGE Washington

     

    161.

    Tahj Washington

    WR USC

     

    184.

    Jawhar Jordan

    RB Louisville

     

    197.

    Omar Speights

    LB LSU

     

    201.

    Kitan Oladapo

    S Oregon State

     

    205.

    Evan Williams

    S Oregon

     

    245.

    Clark Barrington

    OG Baylor

     

    2025 GB 3rd


    I am for trading back if possible, but I feel like the 3 WR we would likely be interested in (Thomas, Franklin, and Coleman) would not last beyond 35 at this point. Chiefs, Pats, and Arizona could all use some WR help and Carolina could benefit from another weapon for Bryce too.

     

    i think if any of these 3 are “the guy” we sit tight at 28 and don’t risk it (I even see moving up as a possibility to make sure we get our guy like we did with DK last year). If those 3 are gone then trade back, get Legette in the mid 30’s, and use the remaining capital to move around and help get whomever else we can. We have too many holes and not enough money to ship all our picks away, but if we get at least 5 quality picks (starter and backups) we walk from this draft happy.

     

    We absolutely need at least 1 WR, DT, and S. We should also try to get a LB and DE. After that? OC and double up on either DT or WR. Not necessarily saying to draft in that order (if a good WR falls to Rd 3 you go get him) but those should be priority.

  10. 1 hour ago, HardyBoy said:

    I'm scared to ask what the final question was...so many to choose from...

     

    _ _ _ _

    _ _ _ _ _

     

    Or 

     

    _ _ _ _ _ 

    _ _ _ _

    _ _ _ _ _ _ _

     

    Or

     

    _ _

    _ _ _ _

     

    I could go all night


    … if “painful memories” was a category.

     

    i got all of these in like 2 seconds. My heart hurts again.

  11. I’m pretty firmly on the Thomas/Franklin train as realistic options near 28. Would be willing to move a few spots forward or backward if they are there. I would love to move back a few spots but if either of those guys are there at 28 you run to that podium.

  12. 56 minutes ago, GASabresIUFan said:

    I did a mock draft and Sedric Van Pran fell to us at 99.  If this happens Beane would have to grab him.  It would give him the opportunity to trade Bates, recover Bates’ cap hit and use it to help the defense.

    I doubt SVP lasts that long but if he’s there he is very hard to pass up. My only counter argument is that Center is a *future* need, and we have a lot of needs in the here-and-now to address.

     

    I put our needs in order of priority as follows:

     

    WR, DT, S, CB, LB, OC, OT

     

    Now, as you said, if a guy who could be a potential anchor for 10+ years is sitting there it’s hard to overlook that, but I don’t think we will find a player of that caliber falling that far.

  13. Thinking of you today Scott. I can’t offer any words that will be of help during this time, but if I have learned anything about this community is that we hold each other up when it matters. Bills Mafia will do our part to keep her memory alive, and we are here if you need anything. 
     

    You’ll find each other again somewhere in time.

    • Awesome! (+1) 1
  14. 1 minute ago, GunnerBill said:

    Just a reminder that my first mock last year I mocked Rashee Rice to the Bills in round 1 he had a tough Senior Bowl week and people were absolutely killing me for that pick. 

     

    Looks a tad better now....

    I liked Rice too in the 2-3 round range. Decent size and weight, plus his SMU jersey made it very easy to see him as a Bill lol.

     

    KC made a good trade admittedly. Still has some growing to do but for a rookie he played very well. If we get a guy like that at 28 this year we would consider that a win for sure

  15. Big win. Guess it can’t be that bad under McD since two in-demand coordinators opted to stay instead of leave. That doesn’t absolve McD of his shortcomings, but a few people who were super supportive of Daboll might realize that perhaps he was likely the catalyst for some of the coaching drama a few years back.

    • Agree 4
  16. 2 hours ago, julian said:

    Because TDs are all equally 6 points and advantageous to winning in a significant way, INTs in the other hand are not all equal and in Allen’s case specifically his INTs tend to not be of the back breaking variety 

    I agree with this, and had a thought as to how to view this mathematically. Let’s say we use a “point system” where every TD is worth 6 and INTs are worth -6. I know it’s grossly exaggerated, but give me a moment to elaborate the value here:

     

    Lamar had 28 TDs, and that would be +168 points gained, with 13 T/O’s equaling -78. A net gain of +90.

     

    Allen had 44 TDs, good for +264, and 22 T/O’s for -132, which gives a +132 for JA17.

     

    Stroud had 23 TDs +138 and 9 T/O’s, for a gain for +84.


    Purdy: 31 TDs, +186, T/O’s 13 is -78 for a gain of +108

     

     

    So, this obviously only works for QB’s, but JA blew the others out of the water for how much he contributed points-wise vs the others. Yeah, turnovers suck, but this should show how much value he had at his position and how important he was to winning those games.

     

    I’m not saying Josh should win it, but I’m saying the Turnover argument is not strong in my opinion if you’re the one scoring so many of the points 

     

    • Like (+1) 2
    • Thank you (+1) 2
  17. The Lions are the only team I am ok winning a SB before the Bills out of all the teams who have not won it yet. That fan base deserves good things, and the only way I wouldn’t root for them is if they were playing us. 
     

    …after that? 49ers, Ravens, Chiefs.

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Agree 1
×
×
  • Create New...