teef
-
Posts
11,868 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by teef
-
-
1 hour ago, JFKjr said:
Like Covid shots! Although those were 'recommended' for pregnant women, and REQUIRED if they held certain jobs.
who the ***** is talking about covid. we're talking whether there's an actual link between tyelnol use in pregnant women and autism. you can actually contribute to the conversation or pull this nonsense again. it's typical.
-
2
-
-
2 minutes ago, Yobogoya! said:
I mean who you trust or don't trust is your prerogative, just as it is for any of us.
Ultimately the Harvard report was recommending "judicious" use of tylenol during pregnancy- ie, lowest effective dose. It's about risk/benefit. You find these warnings for pregnant women on pretty much everything these days.
I think people are reading way too much into this, because- well because Trump is Trump and can't help but go "bull in a china shop" no matter what he's saying, lol.
i agree. pregnant women really shouldn't take anything the absolutely don't need, but this has been the case now for as long as i can remember. i agree about trump, but he's not just a regular citizen. his words go a lot farther for some people than others, and we all know there are going to be people out there who are drawing immediate conclusions without any real knowledge. it can be dangerous, but i agree that this hopefully and more than likely won't change much.
-
1
-
1
-
-
Just now, BillsFanNC said:
Well it wasn't anything and everything coming out of Harvard. It was calling out blatantly antisemitic policies and not giving them access to government funding because of it.
it sure was. go back and read...and not to get caught up about harvard. there's something very strange about how this admin is going about health care, ( and i'm sure not suggesting covid was handled the correct way) but the cdc director who trump appointed was fired. shortly there after a hand full of higher ups walked off in protest. doesn't this raise an eyebrow to you at all? jfk is not wrong on everything, but i'd trust any proven medical association before i trusted him.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, BillsFanNC said:
You asked if there was anything new. I showed you what is very new. And then you responded with snark. Refreshing.
Was Harvard, Stanford and Oxford ok when this came out?
The answer is no. Why? Politics.
As far as those particular medical associations go and their recommendations. I'd be quite skeptical on their claims of "following the science" only. Heavily politicized orgs.
snark? i was being serious. a few months ago a certain group was blasting anything that came out of harvard, and now that same school should cause us to be concerned. i'm always concerned about new health info, so if it needs to be looked at so be it. that being said...nothing is new. physicians across all specialties are blasting the news as having no real foundation.
-
1
-
-
25 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:
From August 20, 2025.
Published in journal form August 14th.
https://ehjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12940-025-01208-0
so harvard is ok now? interesting. i'm always for looking into if there's any real correlation or not, but i'm going to go with the recommendations the academy of obstretrics , academy of peds, etc who haven't backed this at all. it it worth looking into? sure. do i think it's anything at all other than confusing some people? yup.
25 minutes ago, Yobogoya! said:Probably because the Harvard report which is the basis for this announcement was published a month ago, and the FDA concluded their review of it just now?
People are acting like Trump concocted this announcement himself, but he's essentially just informing the public about the results of a completely independent study.
Which is what RFKjr said he would do: be transparent about information that's pertinent to public health. Ultimately you and your loved will make your own decision about whether to take tylenol when you're pregnant, but this is really just going to amount to an updated warning label. That's it.
but as far as i know, there's no new evidence that makes this conclusion. if i'm receiving this important info, i want to hear if from clinicians that deliver treatment every day and have actual background on the info. i think it's more than just changing the label. i've already seen post or parents saying it all makes sense now. no it doesn't.
-
1
-
-
12 minutes ago, JFKjr said:
Is there anything out there that is to our benefit?
Processed foods, plastics, massive increase in the childhood vaccine schedule, pesticides, Covid vaccine, GLP-1 drugs as the "solution" to obesity. You could go on and on about the things that are accepted to our detriment.
What has changed is MAHA.
of course there is. people just need to make their own risk/benefit if certain medications or chemicals are worth any potential risk. i do agree with certain points that jfk had. he feels that a lot of our public health concerns have to do with processed foods, plastics, dyes, etc, and i'm totally on board with that. we're not perfect in our family, but we do try to limit that as much as possible.
when it comes to linking tylenol to autism i'm out. i haven't found anything new and necessary to make that claim, so i would really like to know why this is an issue suddenly.
-
1
-
-
my question is why now? is there new evidence that shows there is a possible link? it's been the standard for pregnant women for 20 years so what's changed?
-
1 hour ago, BillsFanNC said:
That's nice.
Not nearly as how completely not amazed I am that you reliably consume media that completely ignores the trans part of trans violence incidents and that you in turn then reliably post this:
i don't think the shooters in either city were down played. i saw everything play out on common media. there didn't seem to be any question who they were to me at least.
what? i was just referring to how you know thought this was yet another conspiracy.
-
1 minute ago, BillsFanNC said:
How much time did you spend marveling at how much others think about Jimmy Kimmel before you decided to post about others posting about Jimmy Kimmel?
That's a lot of Kimmel adjacent time wasted.
You've got a business to run and reliable media to consume man. Don't waste so much time.
i was just more amazed that you believe what you posted.
-
15 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:
and? darvo tactic bro!
-
1
-
-
12 hours ago, BillsFanNC said:
🎯
lol. The amount of mental time people give to Kimmel around here is fascinating.
-
1
-
-
13 minutes ago, SCBills said:
Marco Rubio has pretty much shot to the top of my leader board for hopeful next President.
the small part i saw yesterday was when rubio was speaking. the first thing i though of was how presidential he was.
-
2
-
-
I can’t wait to cut a hole and put that puppy in the microwave.
-
5
-
-
Settle down.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:
Let’s not quote you on that and just go to what she had to say:
Carano fell under heavy criticism after she posted that "Jews were beaten in the streets, not by Nazi soldiers but by their neighbors…. even by children."
The actor continued to say, "Because history is edited, most people today don't realize that to get to the point where Nazi soldiers could easily round up thousands of Jews, the government first made their own neighbors hate them simply for being Jews. How is that any different from hating someone for their political views?"
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/arts/gina-carano-fired-from-mandalorian-after-social-media-post
not mentioned - republican
thank you. yeah...disney didn't like her comment so they canned her. it happens.
-
1
-
-
Just now, AlBUNDY4TDS said:
So companies can fire who they want bases on their own policies?
of course. my point was she wasn't fired because of her politics in general as the post made it seem like. she made a specific comment on twitter that her employers didn't like so they canned her. that's life.
-
1
-
-
if i remember correctly, gina carano made the comment along the lines of being a republican was like being a jew in nazi germany, (don't quote me on that) and disney didn't like that because the rumors of being nazi sympathizers back in the day.
-
cakewalk *****!
-
1
-
1
-
-
20 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:
I should have been clearer. Would the fact that if the shooters acted in the name of MAGA have been fringe news and downplayed like how the trans Nashville and Minneapolis shooters were?
I've been on large public university campuses up and down the East Coast a lot over the past half dozen years. I've seen it. It's worse.
Your head is in the sand dude.
i don't think the shooters in either city were down played. i saw everything play out on common media. there didn't seem to be any question who they were to me at least. i also go to eastern universities for continuing ed. i see run of the mill common campuses. maybe we see completely different things through our own lenses. i'm not denying it exists at all, but i think were giving some college kids far too much credit on their political motivations. my head isn't in the sand over it, i just don't feel it's at the point were universities are programing their students in droves.
-
12 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:
I'm aware of my posting volume. Your contention is also weak and shared by some of the most comical posters the board has to offer. Don't be weak.
are you aware of your posting volume? you're the top poster on the entire two bills drive forum...during the football season. it's wednesday and you're at 260+. i don't know how you would even have time to read through what you post unless you spend a shocking amount of time on it. just posting because of headlines is week.
I know it exists on campuses way more than it did previously. And not just from social media as I spend a large amount of time at large universities and have seen it first hand.
no you haven't...at all.
So we've heard a lot about your opinion on why the documented rise in violent rhetoric and actual violence from people openly associated with the militant trans community are nothing burgers.
Question. If the recent school shootings in Nashville and Minneapolis were done in the name of MAGA, would that be fringe news that you'd have to go search for in your algorithm generated social media silo?
No answer necessary.
dude...i don't care what side they were on. they're ***** shooters and it's awful. and are you trying to push off school shootings as fringe news? i wasn't. fringe new is what you post again and again and again. that sign was fringe news, but you so desperately need it be something. charlie was killed by a crazy kid who didn't share the same ideas as daddy. these kids are not well, and i get that they attach onto these groups. they're lost and i agree with you on that.
-
1 minute ago, BillsFanNC said:
It took two minutes to find those. I can post hundreds more. What are you saying it's all AI or something?
If you consume legacy media and are busy running a business you have zero chance of hearing anything about this. Even Fox News.
C'mon man are you seriously blaming social media for ginning this up when the only way you could possibly learn about the explosion of this crap online and on campuses is BECAUSE a post Elon acquisition Twitter/X exists.
of course you can post more. you post them constantly. do you realize your one of the top posters on this forum because you post like a maniac every day. i'm not telling you not to, but you're the exact type of person who consumes all day, from a directed feed, made specifically to agree with out. i don't blame social media, i blame people that don't understand what they're getting. do you really think this takes up a large portion of campus life? i guarantee it doesn't, but you sure don't realize that because your reality on college campuses is what's being pumped into that brain of yours.
you know why most media outlets including fox news won't show this? it's not hardcore news. it's fringe news that you want to consume. i've heard on here about how colleges are a scam...how colleges are programing anti-americans, etc. it's the great dumbing down of america. just because you find news that fits your narrative, don't assume that other can't find proper news on their own.
5 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:Sigh
the adults are talking.
-
Just now, JDHillFan said:
This is where you lack discernment in your reading. I have expressed my opinion and it has nothing to do with “one poster” despite you trying to make it such. You are veering towards disingenuousness.
i completely understand what your opinion was. have at it. i also have the opinion that many on here are easily played by what they consume, even at the smallest level. that type of talk is never good, but the fear you have over it is unfounded to me. you'll be fine.
-
6 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said:
The thing is Democratic supporters in entertainment are affecting the young voters.
I love Jimmy Kimmel and Stephen Colbert as far as their comedy. I used to watch it all the time but I stopped watching it because they just couldn't stop ripping on Republicans, specifically Trump.
I want to watch comedy for comedy, not to hear more political jargon. I want to get away from it and have my mind on something else. But it wouldn't stop.
Jay Leno then had some comments after Colbert was cancelled and he basically said they went too far with their political commentary. You divide an audience and that's what they did.I refuse to believe the Dems are that dumb, as you said, it was nonsense some the policies they were standing on. It wasn't they they feel this was a better policy, common sense says its not, but their play was "everything the Red stands for, do the complete opposite." That's been their platform even though there are a lot of principles that both parties align on....like illegal immigration. But now they're not aligned just because the Dems want to be anti-Republican.
the entertainment industry has always been on the blue side. it really doesn't mean that much to me as long as the politics are kept at a minimum. when it's the heavy basis for comedy of a show, it looses me too. i'm also not someone who refuses to watch a movie because of a political view of an actor. i have no idea why that bothers anyone.
your last paragraph is the big one. there's definitely a resistance, and feeling of no because it's trump. i get it, but much of that was trumps doing over the years. i just don't remember this level of anger concerning politics. i'm not blaming it on trump, but i will call him out for leading this country out from it.
when he addressed the kirk murder, he immediately started attacking and calling out the other side. not that he wasn't in the right, but maybe it's time to be a leader. maybe it's time to temper all of this back, and unify this country. he didn't...at all. as much as liberals play that no because of trump card, the maga group blames every one of their own mistakes on the left boogey man. common sense has been thrown out the window on both sides, and we need someone to help walk this country through this imo.
12 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:it's just one poster...
see what i mean? how much of this do have to sift through a day. you have a directed feed that pumps you full of this. you don't think that's on purpose?
-
6 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:
Won’t happen simply because republicans will piss it away. I expect that to happen sooner rather than later.
You lack discernment in your reading.
then explain it to me. i'm trying to run a business here. this board isn't my main priority.
1 minute ago, JDHillFan said:The “you’re scared” part is just so weak and embarrassing. I simply disagree with you. That has led you to talk about being frenzied and scared. Nice work.
that's fine we disagree. you think one poster on a bulletin board is more volatile than i do. wasn't this what it's all about? but the moment you start calling people out for the side they're on, it becomes a joke to me.
RFK In Charge of Health Care
in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Posted
uhhh...couldn't this be twisted back around on you. weren't people pooping all over harvard a few months ago, and now they suddenly believe what comes out of that school?