-
Posts
11,873 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by teef
-
-
14 hours ago, JDHillFan said:
What will you do?
Nothing. I just have no idea why a grown man would act in such a way. He’s completely full of ***** about not being able to tag soe
one in.
14 hours ago, BillsFanNC said:Teef.
teEf
teeF
TEEF
Hey Teef. ***** off.
Simon has prohibited me from tagging ANYONE.
A bit ridiculous for a mod to prohibit the use of a basic board function isn't it?
But here we are.
B word to Simon.
Until then.
***** off.
Oh my. Did you type this while dancing around in women’s clothing? Let me guess…you did a lot of trans “research” after the game? Calm down nurses clothing.
-
6 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:
⬆️
What's way more concerning by pointing out the very recent trend of teaching CHILDREN in SCHOOL about trans ideology?
Being a head in the sand moron, like teef, who turns it into a Republicans pounce thing.
Refreshing.
Tell us teef, should we be teaching 8 year olds about heterosexual anything in school?
You’re a total child. How bad do you need this in your life. Like…you really need this. Honestly man, quit being a coward and grow a dick. I’ve said multiple times don’t think anything like this should ever be taught in schools. I just think it’s old mad rage bait. There’s a group of people who lack substance in their lives and truly need a team. That’s you. What’s more pathetic is you can’t address me because you know you’ll get called out if you do. Get a life brother, and give up the trans fetish you freak.
-
1
-
-
On 11/13/2025 at 2:14 PM, BillsFanNC said:
It's such an exceedingly rare portion of the population, why do you care?
- teef
It's such an exceedingly rare portion of the population that I can't concern myself with a correspondingly disproportionate population of CHILDREN being exposed to it in SCHOOLS.
- Also teef
Dude…you’re a 53 year old man who does this *****. Honestly man…take a step back. Do you even have a family to spend time with. Like I’ve told you countless times before, don’t ***** mention me unless you have the balls to tag me in. Grow a dick already. Have fun stressing out over the trans you strange *****. If this distracts you from the Epstein files so be it.
On 11/13/2025 at 1:33 PM, B-Man said:LOL.
Let's just break down this bullsh*t, shall we ?
The amount of Transgender people doesn't even enter into the discussion.
EVERYONE'S objection is for the safe upbringing of our children without being indoctrinated.
You can wear a dress and cut off anything that you like, that's your right, but don't you demand that I have to accept your delusion as real.
Your assumption about NC's browsing history says so much about YOU.
and finally your ridiculous try to shame @BillsFanNC with the "nurse clothing" childishness.
Was that supposed to be an insult ??
As a Registered Nurse for over 45 years I find your ignorance all too Teef'ish.
,
How did I miss this little tantrum. When your media feed stops telling you what to think, I’ll have an actual talk with you. The two of you are in here 24-7. It’s a joke. The small world you two live in is amazing. Just continue being old man scared of everything, and I’ll live my life. This is why I don’t come on here on weekends. You two are sad.
-
7 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:
The biggie question imo is why anything involving Epstein was hidden/redacted/confidential to begin with, outside of the victims involved.
As for Trump, the flip side of the argument is why he would demand release of the files if he knew he was in them.
Some people are just above the law.
he certainly wouldn't have approached it the way he did if he knew he was in them. this is certainly bigger than just trump.
-
2
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, wnyguy said:
I agree that he may be protecting someone or even someones and it very likely means he was told to stand down on this issue.
very likely. it was just too extreme of a pivot.
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
-
Just now, wnyguy said:
I think something is up for sure and it makes you wonder why Trump is fighting the release of these files. I have my suspicions on it but I want all the files, videos, and transcripts released to the public so all those involved are exposed.
exactly. i feel the same way. as i said before, i don't at this time think trump was sleeping with underage girls. there's numerous people on both sides that could fall because of this. in terms of trump, my guess is that he's maybe trying to protect some people, or possibly there's a business/social dealing that could make him look bad in public opinion. who knows, but this isn't just a political issue.
-
1
-
-
11 minutes ago, B-Man said:
No.
Handling something poorly does not make it suspect.
Unless you are consumed with so much bias for President Trump that you automatically assume the worst.
I see no (brave) comments regarding the way the democrats tried (and failed) to create a lie about our President by releasing these three e-mails
But you be you.
No.
Handling something poorly does not make it suspect.
Unless you are consumed with so much bias for President Trump that you automatically assume the worst.
I see no (brave) comments regarding the way the democrats tried (and failed) to create a lie about our President by releasing these three e-mails
But you be you.
you're really so blind that you don't see it as suspect? and explain what i've assumed. i don't think you've read a single word in this thread. so trump calling people who want the files out "losers" is nothing? maxwell being moved after a meeting to new prison is a nothing? you have to be willfully ignorant to call this nothing.
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, IYKYK said:
I am calm. I’m not the one who suddenly wants the files released based on who’s in office. Like you are. The ret of your diatribe is just word salad.
no...you are someone that definitely can't handle your emotions. you think people just want this out now? there have been countless documentaries on the subject, news stories, etc. when your acting president that proclaims he's going to release the files and then completely does a 180, doesn't that make you think something is up? i asked you and you called it word salad. if you can't have a reasonable conversation, don't ***** bother me.
-
1
-
-
dude...stop mentioning me without tagging me in, and don't give me the bull#### that you can't. we get it. you're are obsessed with such an incredibly small majority of our population. this ***** isn't normal. i guarantee there's some messed up ***** on you browsing history. no one else would be this with such intensity. does the nc in your name stand for nurses clothing?
-
Just now, IYKYK said:
I think they should be released. Not for the reasons you do, to nail Trump. That’s the only reason why the leftists want it released. Don’t you agree with that?
you need to roll it back and calm down. i don't want them out to nail trump, and if you took the time to read what i said, i think it's pretty obvious. and no...i don't think it's the only reason leftists want it released. there are people in both political parties that want it out. it was the systematic raping of girls, and who ever is involved should pay.
so...and this is a question for @B-Man who probably doesn't have the courage to answer, don't you think the way trump handled it was wildly suspect? didn't it raise an eyebrow for you just a bit?
-
7 minutes ago, IYKYK said:
lol!!!!
You can say the same thing about yourself!
For your information, I belong to neither “side” I’m just not interested in the batschitt crazy leftists have to say.don't you agree though? shouldn't they get released? i imagine both sides are very involved, so just release the damn thing.
-
1 minute ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said:
The truth is both sides don't want them released because it confirms what most people already know, politicians and people with large sums of money and influence, are scumbags.
i think this is what it is ultimately too. i'm not even sure we'll ever know the sum of it, but there really isn't turning back now.
-
9 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:
agreed except the part about sleeping with little girls. The guy has no moral boundaries. No shame. His past sexual behavior is devoid of virtue and full of slime. what do you think would've have stopped him given an opportunity?
i'm just not ready to put the pedo tag on him.
9 minutes ago, B-Man said:I honestly spit my coffee out Teef. . . . . . LOL
Meanwhile:
"Looks terrible — until you learn that [VICTIM] is the late Virginia Giuffre, who had worked for Trump before she fell into Epstein’s clutches, and had publicly said time and again that the future president never misbehaved in the least toward her."
Writes the Editorial Board of the New York Post, in "Epstein emails: The Dems and their lapdogs with laptops cry Wolff again."
What an incredibly sleazy move, redacting the name Virginia Giuffre, as if it were to protect her, when her name has already been public, she wrote a book to get her story out, she's told us she believed Trump did nothing wrong, and she's no longer alive. It's plainly and deliberately deceptive, and it's stupid too, because the name was going to come out, as it did in less than one day.
Such an idiotic distraction. I'm happy to look at any new evidence about the Epstein story, but I don't want to waste my time on manipulations like this.
I refuse to read the NYT article, "Michael Wolff, Chronicler of Elites, Provided Epstein With Advice on Trump/Mr. Wolff was enough of an insider to provide advice to Jeffrey Epstein on how to handle his dealings with Donald J. Trump."
What does "enough of an insider" even mean?? Enough of a Trump hater? I made that a gift link, in case you want to figure out how straight the NYT is playing it.
Posted by Ann Althouse
https://althouse.blogspot.com/2025/11/looks-terrible-until-you-learn-that.html
how do you feel about trumps actions concerning this? doesn't it seem like hes' trying very hard to hide something? i have no idea why people refuse to look at the most basic of tells.
6 minutes ago, IYKYK said:You’re such a liberal sheep! 🤣
honestly man...get a ***** grip. you don't care about anything but sides. don't you think these files should be released?
-
1
-
-
12 minutes ago, ScotSHO said:
Small things amuse small minds.
you think the rape of girls is a small thing for small minds? that's ***** up.
-
1
-
-
so it begins. the files are no big deal, it's a hoax, why did no one care about it before. we should all care and want this out, and i really don't think there's another choice. i honestly don't think trump was sleeping with young girls, but there's obviously there's something he's trying to hide. his own actions did him in on this. you can't parade around binders with photo ops, promising the release. there's a sudden panic, and the files suddenly can't be released. he called people who kept talking about it "losers" and told people to stop taking about it. there's then a meeting with maxwell, and she's suddenly moved to a much more accommodating prison. i don't know how anyone could deny he's hiding something, whether he's protecting something or someone who knows.
the best thing he can do for himself is release the files and let things fall as they may. we should all want this out there.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
-
19 minutes ago, Wolfgang said:
You are rationalizing your inaction as a citizen...
And now you are projecting that inaction on to me...
You complain all day everyday without ever lifting a finger to petition your government...
This is the lazy idiocy that inspires me to post obnoxious videos to r*****s such as yourself...
Your wish is my command...
I will now respond to your posts with stupid videos just as you requested...
Have a nice day...
You respect a rep that DOESN'T want the files released?
Interesting...
Did he say why?
dude, you straight up lied about calling your reps. not a single person thinks that's true! how did that call go exactly? when you asked to speak to a rep and you were asked why...did you let them know it was to discuss the release of the epstein files? what in the ***** are they possibly going to do? you're now on their radar as the town nutjob.
-
1
-
-
19 minutes ago, Wolfgang said:
What a stupid f*****g question...
If you are serious about getting answers on an issue important to you, why would you NOT contact them?
Given all the nonsense that is typed here on repeat for years and years, it is pure laziness to not contact your reps on what matters to you as a voter...
Unless of course you believe that being a US citizen is a spectator sport...
You might be surprised at how receptive and communicative your reps and their staff can be...
Just as it is telling when they blatantly avoid responding to particular inquiries after you develop a rapport with them...
Citizens can make FOIA requests too...
what a ***** blowhard. not contacting senators or congress men does not in any way shows someone isn't concerned. we elect these people to work for us. not for a ***** second do i or anyone on here thinks you actually contacted someone about this. this is just a childish way to tell people their opinion on the matter isn't valid. again, stick to posting videos. any time your posts go over a sentence or two, you embarrass yourself.
-
2
-
-
Just now, Wolfgang said:
Did you contact your Senators and Congressman to demand the release of these files?
If not, why not?
And if you did, when?
why would anyone have to do that?
-
23 minutes ago, boyst said:
Perhaps you've only seen the BBC News edit. I know many here see bbc and get excited because they know their browser history ... But it's also a news source out of the UK which edited the hell out of Trump's clip. The US media the same thing.
Either way you're living in a paradigm, living in a lie, full of *****. I don't know which one but you can decide. Because you're saying this on one side of your mouth shaking your head yes while the other side of your mouth is going back, maybe to that BBC stuff, and shaking your head yes when Nancy pelosi, Chuck schumer, Maxine waters, many of them said we need to fight like hell, we need to punch them in the face, we need to be violent.
So here you are upset that Trump riled up people that attacked the capitol. Your words.
But when it comes time to call out violence against people who disagree with you, your liberal ideations, Che guevara, whatever commie bastard you're into ... Well I don't see you saying much? In fact I think I saw you say something about Charlie Kirk being only a YouTuber, and being fairly light on the whole stance there.
So yeah, you're just a douchebag hypocrite.
Read what you just wrote. This is childish crash out nonsense. Take a pill, take a walk, go to the gym, or do whatever it is you have to do to calm down. I never mentioned anything about Kirk other than I was sorry for his family. You’re firing on all cylinders right now, so take a deep breath and count to 10. The adults are talking.
-
6 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:
I like how your little tweeter puts "VICTIM" in scare quotes, suggesting that she was nothing more than a 16 year old slut rather than a victim of rape.
Nice.
the ***** we hear about how this a nothing, hoax, etc is going to be disgusting.
-
-
1 minute ago, boyst said:
So what you're saying is the GOP got all the rednecks riled up? Or is it all of the GOP is a bunch of rednecks? Or is everyone that went on January 6th a gop? Or is it everybody on January 6th is a redneck?
First off let's stop lumping everybody together...
The rest is your perception, and that's okay. Some people just aren't as smart as other people. It just because you're still learning it's not a bad thing, keep it up buddy. I really hope that one day you can advance to the big boy table, because eventually you'll end up where the men sit.
Because that's the point, disagree on perception and opinion all you want but then lumping everyone together is the biggest part of the problem. Maturity is to overcome that.
I've seen you lump anybody here that's a republican in with some sort of maga Trump supporter who said January 6th was a great thing. I get it, you're outside your abilities or tapping the very best you can of intelligence but do some self-reflection to realize it's not an US versus them, you versus anyone. We're all the same.
i never mentioned the gop. i think specifically trump riled people up by telling them the election was stolen. that group at the capitOl was a bunch of redneck proud boys...not the gop. there is a certain group that blindly follows trump, (i get these people exist on both sides) and when he says dangerous things like an election was rigged, they react without thought or reason. show me once where i lumped one group with the other.
and with the big boy intelligence *****...come on. we've all read some of your posts, i'd think strong and hard calling someone unintelligent just because they don't agree with your opinion. i have four year of college, four year of grad school, and another year of post grad under my belt. i know that high school degree makes you feel special, but no.
-
48 minutes ago, boyst said:
Have you watched the whole speech by Trump? Have you watched the whole footage of the J6? Seems the stuff at the Capitol (btw it's not an A its an O) was interesting. A lot of cheerleading outside to get folks in and rallied by folks who didn't go in or make a move.
Trump didn't call to have violence. This was hours later. The police were told to stand down, as was the guard, pelosi wanted the optics that it generated. It was all a politically staged event for both sides.
Also, Jesus Christ bro. Capitol. Not capital.
The election didn't make sense with the results. Statically it was like a .0001% of opportunity
You're not allowed to tag people? That part is BS. Complete BS. It's your stupid "bump" to clog up the board that's the problem. But so is @Homelander and @Trump_is_Mentally_fit who should be outright banned. Neither contribute to football nor actually do anything more than troll.
so what you're saying the dems got all the rednecks riled up so they would attack the capitOl? not for a single second do i think the election was rigged. we all know trump. he found out he lost and crashed out. his ego was hurt and he couldn't bring himself to handle it. he started looking for votes and riling up his supporters. i wonder how mike pence feels about the election being rigged.
trump incited violence just by letting people think he was being robbed. whether or not you agree with the election results, this is what he did. he knew damn well what that crowd was there for and did nothing to stop it. and a political event staged by both sides? nope. one group of middle aged, cosplay, proud boys decided to go to the capitOl and start some *****. if they were caught up in a dem conspiracy, they're nothing but stupid pawns. play this how you want, if they weren't there that day, j6 doesn't happen.
2 minutes ago, B-Man said:A perfect reply to show why I stopped our conversation.
In my post I explained that there was no reason for me, or anyone to reply to your insistent "why were they there ?"
You come back with a childish "you can't even answer the question"
Of course I could.
You then refer to me as a 'coward' because I won't play patty-cakes with you.
Lets just go back to where we were.
I will post articles and opinion pieces filled with facts and links.
and you will bury your head in the sand and regurgitate the same posts over and over.
Added: Learn how to use capital letters, you are an adult.
.
you just didn't want to answer because you knew what i was getting at. you couldn't answer but other posters with different opinions than me did with no problem. you be an adult and actually stand up for self. post whatever you want. i'll wait for a few others to cover up and make excuses for every stupid thing this administration does. you're a rube.
-
1 hour ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:
Personally, I think it was symptomatic of a much bigger issue, and that’s a fundamental lack of trust in our elections/leadership. I believe that the events of 1/6 were set in place when leadership of the Democrats party referred to Trumps election as illegitimate, a Russian op, a coup and more. I believe that set the stage for all sorts of nefarious and shady dealings by the Dems looking to stifle the Trump agenda. I most definitely believe Trump supporters saw that whole 4 year debacle and took it personally. So, when Trump loses the election, he started on his version of stolen and illegitimate elections. I think some people believed it, it motivated them to action. I think some people probably didn’t believe the election was stolen yet figured if the Dems did it, might as well support the cause and turn out. Then of course, there were the hyper aggressive people in the crowd who like to see sh$t burn and things spiraled from there.
I think people are manipulated into believing all sorts of things— illegitimate elections, stolen elections, classified document raids, “slippage”, and mostly that most political inquiries are completed to uncover the truth.
i agree with this 1000%. well put.

How much did you pay for gas and groceries today?
in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Posted
just saw that coffee was up 41% a pound from last year, and steak is 13% more. bummer.