Last Guy on the Bench
-
Posts
793 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Last Guy on the Bench
-
-
I'm going against the chalk to say Bernard.
Can't say I had ever heard of him pre-draft, but watching the highlights, reading the scouting reports, and, most of all, listening to him (super impressive guy), he's the kind of player I just love. And I still have a soft spot for a playmaking linebacker, because I am old and haven't quite caught up to the fact that LBs aren't nearly as important as they once were.
He's not the best player we drafted (probably), and could just be a kind of useful backup in his career. But I'm hoping he's stamped for bigger things. Love the way he plays.
Shakir would probably be second for me.
-
5
-
1
-
-
The most early crowd noise on opening day:
Josh comes out of the tunnel
Von makes a tackle (especially if a sack)
Araiza out for his first punt
Not necessarily in that order.
-
1
-
2
-
-
Kiper very high on him on ESPN. Lots of INTs and PBUs. Be interesting to see how he does against NFL talent in training camp. That's a big jump.
-
6
-
1
-
-
11 minutes ago, Rocky Landing said:
I would put Kumerow ahead of Stevenson, especially if he loses the competition at P/KR, which I certainly hope he does.
Agreed. And my big hope is that Hodgins is fully healthy and can nail down the final spot as a legit outside (though not speed) guy, passing both Kumerow and Stevenson. Really liked him as a draft pick, and it sounds like he has impressed in camp, but just had too many injuries. Who knows, though?
I also wonder if they will really keep all three slot-type guys - Crowder, McKenzie, Shakir. Could well be, but could one of them possibly be cut?
-
1
-
-
From the comments under that highlight video:
"ATG MVP Sports Highlights
25 minutes ago
He wore 34 in 2017, 26 from 2018-2020, and 2 in 2021!"
-
5 minutes ago, Buffalo03 said:
Looks like 26. Or possibly both lol
I was confused by this too. Thought the highlights were of two different guys who were both fast as *****.
But looks like he's both. If you google image search his name, he's wearing 26 and 2 at different times.
-
5 minutes ago, Cheektowaga Chad said:
The great blue mountain state goats coach was electric
I loved Ed Marinaro when I was a kid. Loved that whole Vikes team really.
But Good Lord, that was cringe.
-
Anyone have a preference for best draft tracker? I usually just use the NFL site, but am curious if some have a better interface, more info, etc.
-
2 hours ago, Fan in Chicago said:
For the first time in forever, I have no TV or cable services. I have installed the ESPN app. Can I watch the draft through that app without any subscriptions?
I think the NFL network will stream on the NFL app, but only on smartphones/tablets. Don't think you can stream on a computer or to a TV.
Better is to take a free trial from one of the TV providers (YouTube, Hulu, Fubo, etc.). I used up all my free trials (though you can get more with a different email), so I ponied up for half price Sling for a month, which gives me NFL Network and ESPN. But you can get all that for free if you have an email that hasn't been used yet for a trial.
-
35 minutes ago, DrPJax said:
Was just quoting him directly. Check out his interview w tasker / brown. I think it’s his risk evaluation perhaps concerning guys with medical issues whom he feels if you take them and have to sit them while seeing if they return to form CAN set them up for failure. Was his analysis and related to if he was faced with two guys rated equally on his board. He said he would then go for higher floor guy over POSSIBLE higher ceiling as it’s a safer risk , and fairer for expectations to the players. Intersting ideas. Check out the podcast and see if you get the same takeaway. It’s always possible I misunderstood, but it was about players with Med issues on their board, not necessarily his entire approach to every player / pick. At high picks he didn’t feel it was fair to take a guy that high with Med issues and then have him sitting out with that pressure to get to his full ceiling. Could be just smoke ,, but he seemed sincere. 😊
I think he was saying that it depends on how immediately you need them to play. He said he would be comfortable with a high floor/low ceiling guy if he had good vets at that position and the draftee didn't need to play right away. But he said if it was a real position of need, he might take the high floor lower ceiling guy. He worries that if you plug a high ceiling guy in too soon you are setting him up for failure.
-
8 minutes ago, MrEpsYtown said:
Unpopular opinion, but there has been a shift and ESPN coverage is better. Their highlights are better and they show highlights and analyze almost every pick over three days. I like Mel. He is like a savant in a weird way. He’s super awkward, but I like his analysis. Not a McShay guy. It was unbearable when Gruden was on.
I love DJ and I really liked Mayock. But they skip over picks too much and sometimes just show the scroll at the bottom. ESPN does the scroll, but they always circle back and analyze the picks and show highlights.
So I will watch NFLN a lot tonight, but will watch ESPN the other days because they actually talk about the picks and show highlights on days 2 and 3. The ABC feed is for people like my wife who like the stories and the stuff like that.
Good tip. I haven't watched ESPN in a few years. Maybe I will try them on Days 2 and 3. Thanks. I much prefer analysis and clips of the later picks to all the rehashing of Round 1 that seems to go on. If ESPN is better at that, then I'm in.
-
1
-
-
The Bills move up slightly and shock everyone by taking Devin Lloyd.
-
1
-
-
Ha ha. I really enjoyed that (a sign of draft addiction - another sign is I've watched that terrible movie twice). Telesco is the dude.
-
2 hours ago, Big Blitz said:
Thanks. People who judge mocks by percentage of exact player at exact draft position are missing the whole point. Mocks give you a pretty decent, if imperfect, sense of the shape of the draft and of the ranges and scenarios for various players.
In Sharp's tables, the top 20 are startlingly accurate (9 of the top 10 were predicted to be top 10, and 7 of the next 10 were predicted to be in the 11-20 range).
Precision naturally decreases as you go down. Mocks that go into the later rounds should be looked at with a much broader lens (e.g., how many guys predicted to be Day 2 were actually Day 2). There is no sense expecting a super close correlation the farther down you go, but I bet you still get a reasonable sense of the shape and of the bulk of the players going in a given (expanding) range.
There is a lot of useful information in aggregated mocks, especially for Rounds 1 and 2, unless you are trying to figure out exactly who the number 56 pick will be or something insane like that. Then they are useless. But so is everything else, including detailed notes from the war room of the team actually picking number 56, since even they only have a mock-like idea of who will be there.
-
1
-
1
-
3
-
-
51 minutes ago, Warcodered said:
"That's what I do. You ever seen the Patriots vs. Isaiah McKenzie?"
😂
-
19 hours ago, SlimShady'sSpaceForce said:
Looks like he's put on some weight.
-
2 minutes ago, Homey D. Clown said:
apparently you don't need the dish to get the ticket, you can get it from their streaming service now. I have decided a couple of years ago to just get NFL gamepass, go do stuff during the acrual game, then watch it right afterward. you can hide final scores on the NFL app and fact forward through all the BS for 99 bucks, or watch the condensed game.
Same for me. I had GamePass live for years living overseas, but since I moved back to the U.S. last year, I've been very happy to pay the $99 and just watch the games on delay, Sunday afternoon or evening. I actually like not spending my fall Sundays stuck in front of the TV. I get the beautiful fall early afternoons, and then I come in to watch the game, in total ignorance of what happened. I also love jetting past the commercials this way.
-
1
-
-
9 minutes ago, Simon said:
Yep.
But someday I hope to upgrade to something less reliable and more complicated so that I can watch 1000 crappy TV shows and then get on the internet and pretend I'm better than everybody else.
I hear you about the Internet bragging. But why do you think streaming is unreliable? Can’t remember the last time I had any issue streaming live sports or anything else.
-
1
-
-
Highest paid?
Funny response underneath, with Will Smith screaming, "Keep Josh Allen's name out your f*&#&$ mouth."
-
1
-
2
-
-
39 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:
I think he will be there in the 2nd
Doubt he'll be there when the Bills pick - maybe if they move up. Would be amazing to grab him in the 2nd. I'd actually be comfortable taking him in the first (behind Williams, Wilson, Olave - who are likely all gone by 25).
-
2
-
-
CB
LB
TE
P
WR
OL
Maroon/Burgundy-ish
-
-
8 hours ago, Don Otreply said:
Yes!
But will be topped again when we win it all this year!
Lord, I hope not. My heart couldn't take it. I hope when we win it all this year we're up early and cruise to a 50 point victory. I hope the rest of the country is completely bored by how dominant the Bills are. That Chiefs game almost killed me. I want more playoff wins like the *Pats game. Now that was relaxing.
-
1
-
-
Troy Andersen LB Montana St.
Matt Araiza P San Diego St.
-
6
-
Favorite pick?
in The Stadium Wall
Posted
Can't argue with that. Another super impressive guy. I hadn't watched much of him, because of the reports that he doesn't tackle (which now seem way overblown). But the more I see, the more sure I am that at worst he will be a decent starting corner. At best, he's got the juice and the mentality to be an all-pro if he puts it together.