baskingridgebillsfan

this is true but he took over the Pats and the Jets at extreme low points, thinking the Jets record was 1-15 when he arrived , and had one in a Super bowl and the other in a championship game in very short order. you wouldn't sign up for trips to championship games or super bowls. ? Diminishing his accomplishments doesn't ring true you can look at it as three 8-8 imo . Brady say most of game 17 in year one, and the Bills benched tt in year 3. a 500 record is kind of what you get most years that you don't have a solid qb.

it also assumes Whaley was taking Ebron.

no it is not good enough but it is treated by the news as if they are the 76-77 bucs. you know what changes everything a great qb. 24-24 is kind of what you get without one

where did he find Mike g ? off of the trash heap. The fact that you are overly concerned about a back up rb shows how little you understand

pegs has nothing to do with the 17 years. he is hovering around 500 in his three years. not great but hardly a disaster. The 17 year narrative should never be part of conversation about Pegs. As for Sugar coating, I would just like some journalism instead of these hatchet jobs .

yes. that is a tax we can all get behind.

in ny they have two papers one in the yankee paper the other the mets paper, each paper bashes the team that they do not favor. I would guess it comes down to who advertises with them, but who knows. My question is in a one paper town how does it make sense to purposely run down your hometown teams. I am not saying they should be overly slanted like Msnbc of Fox , It would be refreshing if they wrote factual down the middle pieces .

if anyone listen to Buddy while he was hear they would know trading was not his thing. When he traded up two spots to take Graham I believe he cracked a joke aimed at himself and said " we are riverboat gambler now "

not sure what the two have to do with each other. Whaley watched Taylor for two years and wanted to do better. That is fair. Now weather he was able to find better in this offseason is debatable. Whaley would tell you I know what Taylor can't do , lets try something else. The coach will say I know at what Taylor can do why take a chance we will down grade. Both points are valid

it is a fact. the are not in trouble. think of it as a break glass if needed. They haven't needed the money so why do anything. Now if you tell me if they there was a top ten QB available and they needed 30 million and couldn't make it happen , you would have a point

I love that everybody kills the 16 draft , they forget about Seymour and that two players haven't played yet and Lawson didn't have an off season

What has Taylor shown to make you think he will ever be anything but Average at best ?

here here

yeah we sell wine so not such a big deal . oh and these are kids

again. there are not many gm's that have a clean record when it comes to picking qb's . If anything he should be taking more shots until he hits on one

Him and 20 other gms? agreed. Thinking about some other one voice situations. Bill Parcells, never really heard much from George young. Bill Walsh, Bill b, Joe Gibbs , Andy Reid , ect

I Agree with him on Taylor. I think his point was If we don't play Ej we will never know if he is any good.

I would like to use this tread to mention Whaley drafted this player in the 6th round.

Manuel; you have to take your shot with qbs many more miss then hit. Watkins trade tbd Darby and Miller appear they will be long time starters 2016 everyone seems to forget about Seymour . plus listenbee, Lawson and Ragland basically red shirted

when you are devoid of talent you say things like this is the worst day in Buffalo sports

you do know that reworking the Glenn and Darius contracts gets them close to 20 million if they wanted to. You also know they have a fortune to play with next offseason.

nix never traded. not even during the draft

but they got Mg by dumpster diving , why can't they find another the same way ? one of the other 5 running backs the pats have can also run up and down on our d. Let's not turn Mg into Jim Brown

why ?

I have a little experience with this , it turns out if you drink to much water the test comes back neutral. It proves nothing but most assume you are covering up something . When I hire someone and H.R tells me someone saturated their drug test and ask me what I want to do ? I of course say hire them what do I care If they are smoking weed. fyi It happens a lot , way more then you would think