BuffaLoko
-
Posts
371 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by BuffaLoko
-
-
3 hours ago, No_Matter_What said:
Me! I thought it has something to do with me not being native speaker but apparently not lol.
@NMW... Happen to me as well... wtf did he say? ?
-
6 hours ago, ColeB said:
Eduardo Rodriguez.
I read his ´post-COVID case...scary, to say the least, even worse for a 27 yo athlete.
-
25 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said:
It goes both ways. He is definitely overrated on this board for what he actually has produced.
think about it. How would feel if a sub 200 Passing yard/ game qb made it if he wasn’t on the Bills? Hell, half the people trash Lamar Jackson after he won a MVP.
Not everything is yards, although that is mostly how production is measured for the QB Job, however if you remove your blinders (I know, I know, just the opposite type than the ones I am wearing ?) and care enough to see the summary they played ab´ him in the top 100, you´ll find out that gem of the dropped ball, picked up ball and jump over ten players in order to get the first down, in the TG Game at DallASS... that counts only as half a yard, however that play it was THE WHOLE GAME for many, at least for me... c´mon man! just give some credit (and keep your love, for yourself) to a guy you´ll see in the good boys side for at least a decade f everything goes as planned...
-
1
-
-
13 hours ago, SCBills said:
I can’t help but think about Diggs calling Josh Allen “a dawg” when asked about playing with him.
Game recognize game.
Players aren’t out here evaluating other guys in the league based on draft concerns and whatever analytics fit their confirmation bias.
Will be interesting to see what other QBs are voted top 100.
I personally think he’s a corrected deep ball away from being an absolute monster.
I saw the firs two series of 10, from 100 down to 80, ans I think QB KyleR Murray made it to 91ish...
-
3 hours ago, Ridgewaycynic2013 said:
Abusive codependency? ?
Sarcasm around every thread is at a record high today! and I like it! ?
-
1 hour ago, SDS said:
The topic was beaten like a dead horse and then it was being used for this news. There are no more silly names left to discuss. However, the other topic deserves it’s own space.Mr SDS, do not ever underestimate silliness.... ?
-
they say it is a small world, isn´t it...? ?
-
5 hours ago, J-GunJoshAllen17 said:
Kim Pegula is actaully a pretty dumb person. She lucked into her position in life and has really no business running a sports team or any other large scale business operation.
As someone already said: ¨opinions¨ only or how can you know all of this in your statement? based in your experience? or maybe by being acquainted to someone who runs a business?, I´d like you to please share with us, otherwise, I think can (imaginary) hear the automated response of ¨just my gut or opinion¨, and all is well and settled! ?
-
16 hours ago, Reneth Gilne said:
taking hits isnt why he is a fraud, it was how he pretended to make reads downfield and never threw it there. The game he finally got benched was the one where TO called him out for this to the coach after Jauron was fired. Fitz came in and it was a whole new ball game. He came back in when Chan took over and lasted 2 games before getting cut after throwing the ball over his head out of bounds to avoid the hit. It was fourth and long, game on the line vs GB, he should have thrown it, pure cowardice. Like Ortons slide it was selfish and lost the game on that play.
The "Hit" has long been debated here mainly because his best game ever as a bill came the following weekend. Ala Rob johnson who openly admitted holding on to the ball to raise his qb rating since sacks didnt count as much as incompletions, trent learned that marshawn and fred could score on any given throw and just kept doing that ad nauseum. Once defenses keyed this were were impotent. Everyone and there mother screamed for long balls and called him captain checkdown, so what did Trent do? He threw more checkdowns, in fact he plain refused to throw deep. If it was the concussion or not, a deep throw isnt exactly brain surgery, in fact its easy, alot of dumb qb's (bradshaw, rob johnson, others...) get away by throwing over the top, no read necessary, just chuck it. Ill also offer that trents "break out" game was against the redskins, he lead us to a comeback win, problem was to this day I swear he overthrew robert royal and Reed lucked into it. On replay you can see he lets it go on a curl route and over throws him and the other guys whos double covered just gets it right in his bread basket. It was the only throw trent ever made like this, a long ball in stride to a covered wr. It was because it was a lucky mistake. Had trent admitted this, or thrown deep in his last 10 games or stopped looking in the monitors to fix his hair in post game pressers, or had those shifty darting eyes that never looked anyone square in the face, or made it on another team after leaving the bills and had success id have given him a pass. But instead he just faked being a real nfl qb for as long as possible and wasted valuable time pretending to be a viable starter.
I get you might not have seen it this way but I loathed him and for multiple reasons, and a concussion doesnt seem to ruin other peoples careers, not just one, and he seemed to play the same before it happened anyway, just dump offs and screens. But we now have a real man at qb with a real brain and arm but most important of all, courage, something I never witnessed in captain checkdown.
Best QB resume for Trent Edwards I have seen in a long time...
-
2
-
-
On 6/11/2020 at 5:04 PM, billsfan89 said:
I love the aggressiveness Josh shows on third down. However I think on first and second down he needs to take a check down a bit more. The easiest way to get in third and long situations is to not take the 3-4 yard or even 2 yard dump off on an early down. So yes be aggressive but not stupid on third down but be smart on first and second down so you don't have to be aggressive as much on third down.
nicely put, Sir!?
-
1 hour ago, GregPersons said:
Momentum is building toward Kaepernick returning to the NFL. Roger Goodell has officially encouraged NFL teams to sign Kaep, and also offered him an open-ended invitation to join the NFL league's office to fight racial injustice.
What an opportunity to test our TSW prognosticators. Here's a story that's headed toward some type of ending and new beginning. What do you think will happen? Or what should happen?
Here's what I think should happen. Kaepernick would be a perfect fit for the LA Chargers.
Why?
—Chargers need a reason for people to care about them. They are easily Los Angeles most forgettable team.
—LA is a very pro-Kaepernick city, as opposed to say, Nashville or Buffalo or Jacksonville
—The new stadium in Inglewood would absolutely sell more tickets with Kaepernick playing, just on principle he would receive support, even if they go 0-16
—For as much as the Spanos family are garbage, they owe the NFL for helping them get such a prime relocation after failing to get a new San Diego stadium... they would owe it to the NFL to take "the risk" of signing Kaep.
Despite a certain moderator with a Christmas Story avatar mocking this suggestion in the "Kaep to NE" thread, apparently I'm not the only one to think the Chargers make sense for Kaep -- https://boltbeat.com/2020/06/15/la-chargers-colin-kaepernick-flier/
Anyway. What do you think will happen?
I voted 1 (yes) an agree with your take on LAChargers!
-
1
-
-
6 minutes ago, Billl said:
Thanks (Bill is my IRL name as well, BTW)
Great! that is a nice coincidence then,?
-
19 hours ago, Billl said:
They should at least be up front about the fact that these displays are advertisements. They intentionally do it on the sly in order to make people think these are organic displays and not paid sponsorships. Pretty manipulative, IMO.
Bill .... as in Buffalo Bill.... this beer is for you,
great take! the hypocrisy comes from not being transparent or showing upfront what separates a true act of patriotism from paid advertisement, in regards to an out-of.-the -field institution, amid being a legit institution...
-
1
-
1
-
-
12 minutes ago, Don Otreply said:
Nice to see us included in the conversation, although iirc this was posted last week, or I read it somewhere else... I have a sixty one year old memory, so there is that, ??
Go Bills!!!
Don, yes indeed, Scott you can go here and find 6 pages long reactions to it....
-
1 hour ago, Gugny said:
If the only step the offense takes is significantly less drops, and the D - as you say - doesn't miss a beat/Norman balls out, I absolutely agree that this is a Super Bowl-contending team.
@gugny if you let me, I´d add one more step to your comment, which is less fumbles from Josh...
-
1
-
-
On 5/8/2020 at 1:40 PM, MJS said:
Packers should not be that high. Who even knows if Love will be good? In fact they ranked a lot of the rookies too high.
Can't argue with where they have the Bills. I was kind of hoping we'd sign Mariota or Dalton. They are good backups who have won a lot of games and have playoff experience.
Sign them for no money? You mean? Or for a “rookie”-like contract? ?
-
23 hours ago, Kirby Jackson said:
When teams had no turnover it was WAY easier. It’s the Red Auerbach argument. He, like Paul Brown, deserves credit but it’s much easier to win when your team is always better. BB doesn’t have that luxury in the salary cap era.
In fact, he has it harder than other contemporaries. Team’s that win consistently end up with players who are overpaid to leave. Guys like Nate Solder and Jamie Collins come to mind. He has also turned over parts of his coaching staff a few different times. The Patriotsarewere constantly tweaking things to remain at the top.fixed...sorry Sir fr scratching your post... in all due respect, we don´t know which Pats****** team we will see yet.... ?
-
On 5/4/2020 at 7:57 AM, Chicken Boo said:
This doesn't make the decision, to not take a QB, any better. It was a mistake, I don't care how fans attempt to rationalize it.
This is said in hindsight so your assessment looks better than the decision itself... Sir, let me know, did you state that same argument before or during 2017´s draft day ?
-
On 4/6/2020 at 3:51 PM, Hapless Bills Fan said:
Really good explanation from virologist Peter Kolchinsky of why covid-19 is a harder beast to fight than SARS was.
"Well, the ACE2 doorknob that SARS-1 & SARS-2 use is present on a variety of cells, including those in our lungs & throat. SARS-1 would enter a person via a droplet in the air (from cough) & quickly start infecting lung cells, causing severe damage person could really feel (i.e. become symptomatic). In other words, SARS-1 quickly made its presence known. In some patients, SARS-1 would go into the upper airways to replicate from where it could spread to others with a cough (or just breathing). But b/c SARS-1 patients got very sick from all the virus replicating in their lungs, they were quarantined before others got close enough to get sneezed or coughed on.
SARS-2, on the other hand, takes up residence in the throat cells first, which doesn’t cause significant symptoms. The person can remain asymptomatic or might not think they have anything worse than a cold. And from that person’s throat it can readily spread to others. Over the course of a week, in some patients, it will move into the lung neighborhood and replicate just as SARS-1 would, causing severe symptoms, by which point the person is quarantined, but no matter since it had successfully spread."
"So SARS-1 was a comparatively dumb virus. It went straight for the lungs, announced itself before it could spread to others, and so got social distanced into extinction. ""But SAR-2, the one plaguing us now, is stealthier, spreading first before revealing itself (and causing harm). What’s the take-away for all of us? It’s that beating this virus means social distancing & wearing masks even if we think we aren’t infected. Because we might be. The virus might be replicating in our throats without us knowing (that’s its evil plan!), so put up a roadblock. "
Nature publication about study this info is based upon: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2196-x
The very best explanation I have read (so far) about the cause of high rate of transmission from asymptomatic persons!
-
15 hours ago, Inigo Montoya said:
I agree with you, last year's D was elite. I think our D could be historically great with a legitimate edge rusher like Ngakoue. The Ravens won the Super Bowl in '01 with that amazing defense and Trent Dilfer at QB. The Ravens didn't even bring him back next year. For better or worse, our offense is pretty much set right now for 2020 except for the RB2. If we can put Ngakoue on this D we might not need as much out of Josh Allen and the offense.
Defenses can win championships. The final score of Super Bowl LIII, just the year before last, was Patriots 13 --- LA Rams 3.
Oh! good God, seems like forever before the number of years between ¨today¨ and 2001, be finally long enouf´, so that we forget about Dilfer at QB; happen to wonder why there is not a more recent example?, the road less traveled is.... ?
-
On 3/15/2020 at 2:55 PM, \GoBillsInDallas/ said:
what? ¨no milk today¨...? like in the song?
-
3 hours ago, Qearly2018 said:
Fred Taylor
wow! I had forgotten about that gem! ?
-
On 3/17/2020 at 1:33 PM, Kemp said:
No more excuses for Josh. It's all laid out for him in his 3rd season. Play like a top-tier QB or bye-bye.
Mr Kemp,´for sure I don´t want you as my boss, nor our Team´s GM... much less as our QB if Josh is said ¨bye-bye¨ ?
-
1
-
-
20 hours ago, The Jokeman said:
It's not just the 1st it's also a 4th, 5th and 6th. If it was for #22 alone I'd be less pissed.
Yes Mr Jokeman, and your (if exists) draft picks value chart, or scout data for rookie WRs, should be way better
than the one´s in BB´s staff possession, ?
Yahoo Pick 'em and Survivor leagues
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
Hi Scott! I tried to join today and receive a ¨GROUP IS FULL¨ error message, and IIRC, pickem groups are not limited in size, aren´t they? or is it just my mobile browser, acting up on me? thanks for any advise,