Jump to content

AlCowlingsTaxiService

Community Member
  • Posts

    3,210
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by AlCowlingsTaxiService

  1. 23 hours ago, DefenseWins said:

    Titanic

     

    Not overall, but the short scenes of the old couple huddling as the cabin fills with water, the mother reading to her children and the string quartet playing together for what they surely know is their last time were great scenes

  2. 23 minutes ago, Logic said:

    I posted this in the John Brown thread, and decided to paste it here as well:

    I think it was @Hapless Bills Fan that said it here first, and then I saw Erik Turner and Greg Tompsett of Cover 1 talk about it on Twitter:

    John Brown too easily got erased by aggressive press coverage last year. He too easily got erased from whole games, in general.

    Seeing now how much Brown signed for, compared to how much Sanders cost, and then keeping in mind that the Bills didn't even ask Brown to take a pay cut (according to Brown)...it just seems like the Bills view Sanders as un upgrade.

    In particular, as Turner pointed out: Teams started to play two-high safety zone coverage shells more and more as the year went on to force the Bills to dink and dunk their way own field. It took the offense some time to adjust, and Brown was not particularly helpful in these situations. By contrast, Sanders is more physical, a better route runner in general, and can work underneath more effectively. So while they gave up the speed and familiarity of Brown, they gained the physicality and route running of Sanders and, thus, theoretically gained the ability to more effectively operate against the two-high shells and/or to force defenses back into playing man-to-man.

    TL;DR: Beane and McDermott seem to feel that Sanders is simply better than Brown, or at least more effective at doing what they need from a WR2. They replaced Brown with Sanders as a means of more effectively operating in the short and intermediate game, so that when teams go to soft zones, the Bills can more effectively counter.

    Good post. Certainly more enlightening than the usual “he’s old he sucks” drivel 

    • Agree 1
    • Thank you (+1) 1
  3. 21 hours ago, Coach Tuesday said:


    Do you have kids?  Social media is terrifying.  They spend their time on it (or their friends do) at a young age, and internalize the “like/dislike” dynamic, plus one mistake they make will follow them around for life potentially.  It’s horrible.  (And my parents’ generation is worse!  Baby Boomers on Facebook is possibly the worst thing that has happened in this century.  They fill their time with Facebook-surfing for cat videos, conspiracy theories, stupid memes and lame jokes, hokey sayings of encouragement, pictures of their new kitchens, etc.  THE WORST.)

    I abhor cat videos but I will show you my kitchen remodel 😂

  4. 16 hours ago, IronMaidenBills said:


    I believe it. Why would you say you are interested in being on a SB team and then proceed to not choose a SB competitive team. He just wanted the money, and I could see those reviews as being true. 

    It’s somewhat laughable that fans want to paint Arizona as some also ran mediocrity. They may not be in the inner circle of contenders, but they’re a good team on the rise and could very well be just a step behind the Bills in terms of franchise development.  It’s like watt is the hot girl that some guy pursued, and when she shoots him down, he calls her names and decides she’s a dog 

    • Agree 1
×
×
  • Create New...