Jump to content

jad1

Community Member
  • Posts

    1,345
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by jad1

  1. the really sad thing is the Bills could have drafted Rodgers one pick before the Packers with the pick we gave to Dallas for Losman

     

    They could have drafted Matt Schaub in the 2nd round of the Losman draft too, and kept all the picks that they gave up to move back into the first round to draft JP.

     

    The point isn't how or when you get your franchise QB, the point is that when you make the decision to do so, you make the right choice. In the draft you just have to look at Manning over Leaf, but in FA, remember that the Dolphins chose to sign Culpepper over Brees.

  2. Your pretty confident we will be able to pick a winner, then be able to protect him. Without a line anybody you put back there is doomed.

     

    PTR

     

    The Packers did a pretty good job of doing that with Rodgers.

     

    It would be great to have the 10 other positions set on the offense (and some on the defense) before drafting a QB, but that's not going to happen.

     

    Using that criteria, the Colts weren't set before drafting Manning, the Packers weren't set before drafting Rodgers, and the Saints weren't set before signing Brees.

     

    If you believe that a guy has the talent to be a franchise QB, you grab him, even if it means he and the team have to struggle before things turn around.

     

    And I would argue that if a QB doesn't have the toughness, intangibles, and instinct to survive playing on a sub-par team, he doesn't fit the bill as a franchise QB.

  3. He will come up with answers ... unlike the last regime. Whether he has the talent to win remains to be seen.

     

    He has the talent to run the ball more than 17 times in a game, that's for sure. As bad as the offense was last season, they still had pretty good numbers in the rushing game.

     

    If Gailey can't figure out how to generate some production out of the runners he has on this team, his time here will be short.

     

    He spends a 1st round pick on a running back with all the other needs the Bills had, but he couldn't figure out the right game plan or adjustments to 'get something going' when the season starts.

  4. We couldn't run. That may have had something to do with his play calling.

     

    A lot of folks have been kidding themselves that Chan's play calling would somehow turn it all around. Turns out instead that you need good players. Don't blame Chan. Just accept that we're rebuilding, and figure that if we continue drafting well, that by 2012 or so, Chan's play calls might look a lot better with a good OL, a good QB and two good WRs executing them.

     

    I don't know about that. I would argue that they have the talent to support a better run-to-pass ratio than they called today.

     

    I agree the talent at QB is not up to NFL standards, but if that's the case, why put your QB in the shotgun more than half the game.

     

    Miami used the run game to go from 1-15 to the playoffs, For the Bills to be successful, they have to make a similar commitment to the running game. I didn't see that type of commitment from the Bills coaching staff today.

  5. Okay, I get you think that punting the ball and stopping the Phins, getting the ball back with 20 seconds left is a better scenario than letting your scarecrow QB throw the ball out of his end zone on 4th and 10.

     

    But why give them the safety. What's the extra 20 yards on the punt going to buy you? At least when you get the ball back with 20 seconds left, you only need a FG instead of a TD.

     

    Oh well, nice to know the 10 year tradition of head-scratching coaching decisions continues.

  6. Trent has had no time. Spiller haas no room. Online is awful. That's your game in a nutshell.

     

    PTR

     

    Yeah, and Edwards missed an OLB blitz read, can't get the ball past the DL on screen passes, and checked down on 3rd and long when he had more than enough time to throw.

     

    I know it's an automated response to blame the line for those who want to waste their time defending this guy, but despite the O-line, Edwards has had his opportunity to make plays in this game and hasn't stepped up.

     

    Hopefully he'll snap out of it in the 3rd quarter and rise above and make a play or two, but that's been the hope we've had for just about every quarter this guy has played for the Bills.

  7. "Think about the Pats receiving core during their dynasty. They had no one" - OP

     

    what? while I dont disagree with the majority of the post, what is this about the Pats not having any WR's? Randy Moss? Wes Welker? is that the no one you are referring to?

     

    Moss and Welker weren't on the Pats Super Bowl winning teams (they were on the losing SB team). I think that was the point. The Pats won their Super Bowls with guys like David Givens and Deion Branch playing WR.

  8. Listening to the game last night I was discussing this with my son who is a gigantic Spiller fan, and vehimently disagreed with me when I said Spiller should be the second or third Bills RB to see the field. He thought (like the OP) that Spiller should be the starting RB. What converted him to my way of thinking was I mentioned if this is what he can do against a defense with "fresh" legs .... imagine what he could do if he was "fresh" and the defense was bashed for a quarter or two by Jackson/Lynch/Bell.

     

    I'm not saying Spiller deserves to be second/third string based on ability ... I'm just saying we have four good running backs that are capable of starting, and of the four Spiller has the best chance of being an "electric" game controlling RB running against a defense that has been worn down a half step, but carrying the lions share of the load may be difficult because of his physical build.

     

    I agree and would add that like most rookie RBs, Spiller still has some issues with pass protection. But as Bills fans, we should be thrilled with the options at running back that a good offensive coach like Gailey can use.

     

    Unfortunately Lynch has been injured this preseason, but I'm eager to see what kind of production Gailey can get out of a smash-mouth RB.

     

    The Dolphins went from 1-15 to the playoffs using a diverse running attack. Let Gailey develop the same type of gameplan in Buffalo before running talented guys out of town.

  9. What happened to our kick off coverage? The tackling was horrible.

    And was Brian Moorman moonwalking? Never seen him kick so poorly

     

     

    I don't know what the deal is with the coverage teams, but Moorman might just be worn out and need some rest. It might have been a good idea to bring in another punter just to take some of the reps in training camp.

  10. Because Nix doesn't have the last name of "Shannahan", "Holmgren", or any other easily recognizable name. There also was no mention of 10 million per year in the Nix hiring. He also isn't 32 years old. I think that about covers it......oh,

    and it's important to have a short memory when raging about anything that happens at One Bills Drive.

    No one new who Bill Polian was when Ralph signed him.

    I can distinctly remember the rage some Bills fans felt when Levy took over as head coach, because he didn't have an impressive record at Kansas City.

    Bitterness gets to be like a caffeine addiction after a while.....

     

    Actually, I don't think it has much to do with Nix himself, rather it has to do with the process in which Nix was selected.

     

    The hirings of Polilan and Levy by Wilson do stand out. Unfortunately, along with hiring Saban and Knox, they represent the only good front office hirings Wilson has made during his 50 years as the Bills owner.

     

    No one can argue that the vast majority of Wilson's front-office signings haven't been somewhere between bad and horrible.

     

    With his hiring track record, and the current state of the Bills, you'd think that Wilson's interviewee list would consist of more than two names.

     

    After ten years of failure, it's hard to believe that Wilson wouldn't want to hear some outside opinions about the assessment of talent on the Bills current roster, the upcoming FA and draft prospects, and feedback on possible coaches and candidates.

     

    It's not too much to ask that Wilson spend 4 or 5 days talking to possible GMs to get a good consensus on the direction the team should take to get back to respectability on the field.

     

    Also, since the ownership issue continues to remain fuzzy because Wilson has no sucession plan in place, it might have made some sense to hire a younger GM who could, if successful, remain in the position for the next 10 years or so. It would give a sense of stability to an very unstable situation. Hiring a 70 year old GM just adds more uncertainty for the future outlook of the team.

     

    Anyway, Nix sounds like a good guy and hopefully will be true to his statements in filling out the team's scouting and coaching staffs.

     

    And it's not fair to him, but the decision would have been better received if Wilson had selected him after vetting a more comprehensive list of candidates.

  11. Ralph is not cheap. Ralph is well-intentioned but misguided.

     

    PTR

     

    If misguided means 'horrible at running the football operations side of an NFL franchise,' I agree with you.

     

    Front office ineptitude has led to a decade of mediocrity from the Bills. Most fans realize that the Bills need a smart GM to lead them back to respectability.

     

    To believe that Wilson has found that guy by interviewing only two candidates, you have to believe that Wilson is the greatest front-office selecting owner in the NFL. And he is clearly not that.

     

    Nix, by luck, might turn out to be a great choice to be GM. But Wilson clearly cheated the fans with the half-assed approach he used to fill the position.

  12. Oh it's more than the inept ones. How many coaches do you think have firm job security? You can count them on one hand when Shannahan, Gruden, and Fisher are among those that don't.

     

    More than half of the coaches in the league are safe this season.

     

    Do you really believe that Bellichick said to himself when making his decision, "well so-and-so was in a similar situation as this and he didn't go for it, and ESPN made fun of him for a week"?

     

    Of course not. He probably made his decision based up what he thought Brady could do. Unfortunately he didn't consider that the Colts D could also make a play there. And he lost faith in his own defense to make a stop, like the Colts managed to do.

×
×
  • Create New...