Jump to content

BuffaloHokie13

Community Member
  • Posts

    10,835
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by BuffaloHokie13

  1. 9 minutes ago, wAcKy ZeBrA said:

    I don't read the Atlantic so I'm not sure how they label their editorials, but it's under the heading "IDEAS."

     

    It's also an idea I never heard about until you posted that and since I'm obviously a liberal media lemming I should have heard it before now.

    I clicked the ideas part to check if that was their label, it still doesn't say it's opinion. It just says it's arguments, essays, and inquiries. At the end of the day, it was posted by a recognized media outlet and quite frankly it's a disgusting reaction to our president being recognized for some good work. But they can't let him have even one good day. If it's Trump then it simply cannot be good. Ever. There were several other reactions as well that were less aggressive, but still took the time to attack the character of the people making the nominations in an effort to frame the discussion towards discredit.

  2. 2 minutes ago, wAcKy ZeBrA said:

    Is that their take or Graham’s?

    Is there an Opinion label I'm missing? Is the Atlantic a publisher or a platform?

    1 minute ago, Unforgiven said:

     

    ...with an agenda of  raising taxes, opening borders, defunding police, and a laughable 12 trillion$ new green deal....

    and lets not forget a president who can barely finish a paragraph coherently let alone a sentence.

     

    yikes.

    I think you got those backwards ;)

  3. 7 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

    That's bull. 

     

    Trump is anti-science, anti-anything that is disagreeable to him. 

     

    You guys trying to discredit the media are just making excuses for the lies your party wants people to believe. 

    projection_lens_overhead-projector_-1007

     

    You're talking about a group that is so aggressively anti-anything Trump that the man was nominated twice for the nobel peace prize fro negotiating peace deals in the middle east and their take on it was that it's time to do away with the nobel peace prize...

    • Like (+1) 1
  4. 8 hours ago, SoTier said:

    Apparently, Covid Donnie thinks the American people are as selfish and cowardly as he is.  

    Yeah, there's no way the American people would panic and overbuy essentials like toilet paper, masks, hand sanitizer, rubbing alcohol, meat, canned goods, or dry goods without any consideration for their neighbors, forcing stores to implement purchase limits on many products. 

    • Awesome! (+1) 1
    • Thank you (+1) 2
  5. 10 minutes ago, Crayola64 said:

    I like my idea of a group ignore list!  Not people that have different political opinions, but people who are doing nothing but spamming 

    Are we reaching across the aisle and coming to a consensus group?

     

    I'm currently one of those 0 people on ignore folks, but I'm willing to listen.

  6. 2 hours ago, Julio Hopkins said:

     

    Both Tyrod and McCoy were taking nasty hits all game but sure.  

     

    No, I think Brandon Beane lost that game before it even started.  The O was completely outmatched, and the defense choked it away against one of the worst offenses in the league.

    I mean I like Tyrod a lot, but the Jags hung 45 on Pittsburgh a week later. The D kept us in it, the lack of playmakers kept us out of it.

    • Like (+1) 1
  7. 42 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

    I agree with a lot of what you're saying and some of it I don't.  But if you're not willing to sit down and discuss viewpoints and perspectives and experiences with others that may disagree with you there's' really no hope of finding common ground and understanding to bring people together in order to foster respect and support for all people.  The lack of civility and the unwillingness of everyone to openly and honestly have productive conversations is a big obstacle.  Everybody thinks they're "right" and everyone else is "wrong".  And if any political or social group from the far left to the far right thinks they're going to impose some social solutions on everyone else without any real consequences they're not thinking rationally.    

    Why would they need discussion? They already know all of our feelings before ever hearing us speak. Didn't you see that in the list of 'facts' above? Since they are facts there's no doubt the info is verifiable. 

×
×
  • Create New...