Big Blitz
-
Posts
16,506 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Big Blitz
-
-
This thread is up there with the worst threads ever.
Desperate times. So sad.
I could keep updating the ***t post thread but this is all the content you need to verify I’m right.
-
3
-
-
I cannot wait till they force Taylor Swift to comment on this.
-
3
-
-
On 5/24/2023 at 9:44 PM, B-Man said:
Hang them. Public hangings.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, GunnerBill said:
What if WR6 is just a better player than S2 or DE3 though?
Ask 32 GMs and you’ll hear 32 different answers about the prospect, need, and draft philosophy.
Ultimately it comes down to what you project that player to be. I don’t think there is a right answer. My preference in round 2 pick 60 was to trade up and get my center. They wanted S and got their C later.
I can’t disagree with how we approached this draft.
We were aging out. We have new holes to fill and that means you can’t just give away tons of draft capital to try to move up into the top 15 or top 10. Everything about our roster and cap situation going into this draft said we need picks. Lots of them and we have to hit on them.We don’t know answers or what we should have done until their careers play out anyway and even then you can argue - “who knows how Mahomes pans out if he doesn’t sit for Reid for a full season.”
-
1
-
-
6 hours ago, Beck Water said:
With respect, I think you're thinking may be a bit off in several regards.
I did a post before the draft where I looked at the number of WR drafted in early rounds and where the most successful WRs were selected.
It's definitely not always "the top 2 or 3 WR taken turn out to be the best".
So yeah, you're right, out of 7 1st round WR probably only 2 or 3 will be quality NFL players, but which 2 or 3? That's why teams take shots.
And no, in terms of % of draft picks who succeed, teams don't have "as good a chance to hit" as they would on the 7th WR drafted in round 1. Statistically it's something like 25-30% success at the bottom of the 1st/top of the 2nd round, falls to more like 20% in rd 3 and by rd 5 it's more like 10-15%.
Right I agree with you - you aren’t likely to hit in rounds 5,6, or 7.
My point was simply about weighing reaching on say the WR 5 or 6 in round 1 or taking another position where the “top” 2 or 3 are still there.
-
-
On 5/15/2024 at 4:50 PM, Beast said:
If receivers are the new running backs, three wouldn’t have been selected in the top 9 picks of the draft.
Which is a mistake - only 2 or 3 of those guys are worth it. When do 4 or 5 WRs really hit in one round?
You're passing up other vital pieces chasing WR 1 that’s actually a likely bust when you can draft one in RD 3 or 4 or 5 and have as good a chance to hit as you would on WR 7 in RD 1.
If all the WRs taken in RD 1 are hits then I mean we have scouting down to a science. An exact one.
I want elite WRs to - but I value the elite QB behind an elite oline way more then elite QB with elite WR and mid oline play or worse. What good is having the WR then?
-
13 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:
You need to mine your own data by using the search function or in this recent case tallying posts manually on user profiles. It has multiple posts per hour going back 17 hours.
75 posts in last 12 hours - all in PPP
-
1
-
1
-
-
He’s done more good for the faith in 48 hours than Francis has done in 11 years.
And all the Left had to do was be normal and not care. They can’t help their anger and guilt over being liars and wrong about everything.
-
1
-
1
-
-
Wow. No shame. They know their readers haven’t watched the speech.
What total scum.
-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:
Commie shi.t poster report: Billsfuk.c
Observations as of 12:07 am 5/17/24
The shi.t poster has shi.t posted multiple times per hour for 17 consecutive hours.
WHERE ARE THE STATS ON THIS SITE ???? -
Love it. World is fighting back. And it’s largely bc Twitter 1.0 is gone. The sane are winning.
-
1
-
-
37 minutes ago, BillStime said:
It's always someone else's fault when it comes to the cult - jfc you are fkn pathetic.
Rewrite history?
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
Look at the sentence in your post above... you freaks never think!
Nope. Never.
-
1
-
-
Conservatives on this board: Milton Friedman
Bill Stime: Phil Donahue
-
1
-
-
12 minutes ago, BillStime said:
Racist.
I’ll take the pro America POS all day over the Anti America POS
-
1
-
-
-
18 minutes ago, BillStime said:
It's always the JEWS fault when it comes to you NAZIS.
-
1
-
-
9 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:
Society looks healthy……..
But Trump ………. Decorum………. Class…….. respect ………
-
1 minute ago, BillStime said:
Yup - 100% true... but when you're white, they let you do it!
She can’t define woman.
Why is this thread bumped? We have a Butker thread.
-
2 minutes ago, BillStime said:
Go to bed
Self ban.
-
2 minutes ago, BillStime said:
What was it in 1928?
-
2 minutes ago, BillStime said:
Sure thing…….MAYRA??
-
4 minutes ago, BillStime said:
It's unfortunate that Trump didn't approach his role with the seriousness it deserved, especially with respect to the pandemic. He largely ignored or dismissed the intelligence reports about the virus, which was a critical misstep in the management of the health crisis.
Own it bro.
His role was what the enemy within told him to do.
Choosing to pigeon hole or rewrite the history you created that led to our current economic stagflation and social malaise is quite ….. expected from you.
-
1
-
-
^^^
Why is this posted? Was this on everyone’s mind today?
America’s Fallen Cities: Buffalo
in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Posted
1. Worst run city for decades
2. Worst run county
3. Terrible government bureaucracy
4. Impossible to work with the Unions
5. No serious investment or development outside of Pegula and Roswell - because numbers 1-4. Not because of snow.
It’s a point I’ve made forever about the loss of manufacturing in the 70s. It’s no excuse for countless other cities.