-
Posts
18,499 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Big Blitz
-
-
6 minutes ago, Homelander said:
Hey in your own words care to explain to the 2 people here that read your posts what the context is in each of those situations?
Thanks. I’ll wait.
6 minutes ago, Homelander said:*No one should vote NAZI ever
And that’s why you lost in 2024.
-
-
5 minutes ago, Homelander said:
-
-
Just now, Mikie2times said:
A reporter questioning a politician? What politician is “debating” with the president?
His BASE
-
1
-
-
….Second, I've seen a lot of confusion over the issue of "civilian nuclear power" and "uranium enrichment." These are distinct issues. Iran could have civilian nuclear power without enrichment, but Iran rejected that. Meanwhile, they've enriched uranium far above the level necessary for any civilian purpose. They've been found in violation of their non-proliferation obligations by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which is hardly a rightwing organization.It's one thing to want civilian nuclear energy. It's another thing to demand sophisticated enrichment capacity. And it's still another to cling to enrichment while simultaneously violating basic non-proliferation obligations and enriching right to the point of weapons-grade uranium….
-
God I love belonging* to a party that openly will disagree with each other and debate.
The ideological diverse party vs the Woke Omni Cause party where zero dissent is tolerated or you’re purged.
This is how it should look between the 2 major parties - when they used to share the same stratosphere.
*No one should vote Democrat ever
-
1
-
1
-
-
-
-
Yep
But we need to go to war with Russia for some reason per these same people.
Russia.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
1 minute ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said:
Oh, you just want my attention. How cute you are. Now run along and find something to do, lowlife
Huh?
No, they aren’t losing the war.
And Iran’s only hope to survive would be at minimum the threat of help from Russia.
But bc we have a President that didn’t completely alienate Russia, or antagonize them, Russia is out on Iran.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
-
19 minutes ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said:
No. Can’t imagine what would happen if we had a President that was completely hostile to Russia tho.
Highly likely they side with Iran or at least provide the really significant threat of it.
Yes, it’s Russia, they can walk and chew gum at the same time. And all they’ll need to do is supply Iran.
And if that were the reality, then Iran gets its nukes and continues to be the biggest terrorist threat on the planet.
-
-
-
-
59 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:
As I noted a few times here, Trump's ICE people told him the "hospitality/agriculture" exception to mass deportations is utterly unworkable.
So, again ... a reversal.
Yea about that….-
1
-
-
-
Will never convince me otherwise - this goes for everyone in government or the bureaucracy.
House of Cards was meant to be a cautionary tale.
I think the writers were just given material by the Obama Administration
-
-
ISRAEL V IRAN: Trump just warned everyone should evacuate Tehran
in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Posted