Jump to content

LabattBlue

Community Member
  • Posts

    13,619
  • Joined

Posts posted by LabattBlue

  1. The way Coleman is going, he may not see the end of his rookie contract as a Bill…unless McD & BB let pride get in their way.

     

    As Bob Barker said about Happy Gilmore…”this guy sucks”.

     

     

    • Agree 1
    • Thank you (+1) 1
  2. Just now, NavyBillsFan said:

    I use to post from my Gov. computer while in Bosnia and Iraq bro.  Long days ago man,  Im retired now but my health has been very bad.  51 years old and on the transplant list.  Hope you are well man, we use to have some good chats!

    Sorry to hear that.  May their be better days ahead.  

  3. 18 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:


     

    I clearly said in the op and thread title - this is NOT AN EXCUSE. 
     

    It’s not why we lost.  It’s not why the Chiefs won yesterday.  

     

    Just don’t tell me the league can’t ensure that the playing field can easily be tilted if it needs to do so.  
     

     

    Is it a certainty?  Nope.  We could have beat NE in spite of the refs.   Doesn’t mean they didn’t have an agenda.  
     

    We have a lot of evidence across sports that they’ve rigged games and in a country with legalized gambling - and a league that stands to gain significantly if certain outcomes happen it is absolutely right to question.  
     

    The agenda last week wasn’t - make Buffalo lose.  But question  - who did the league want to win last Sunday?  What was better for the league and for the franchise with the leagues most influential owner?

     

    Make the Pats relevant.  That’s what they did. Because without phantom holds and no DPIs NE job was a lot harder.  And the AFC East was wrapped up.  If they lose at least they got their narrative.  If they win all the better.   
     

    And last night it was “let them play.”  Knowing the Chiefs were probably winning anyway.   
     

    Sometimes “rigging” is limit the flags.  Or just don’t throw them at all.  
     

    Funny how this isn’t a “blame the refs” thread, but it shows up after the Bills lose their first game of the year.  😂

     

    I will move on…let the blame game(I mean the no blame game) carry on for the rest of the season. 😂

  4. 1 hour ago, SDS said:

    For those of you familiar with ticket prices in Miami, I’m wondering if they’ve reached the bottom right now or if they’ll go even lower as we get closer to the game. I’m looking for three tickets in the upper deck, row 15 or below. Right now I’m seeing for $178 each. I don’t know if they go much lower than that for that type of seat.

    Bought tix in the upper deck corner 8 rows up 2 months ago.  Price was around $190 with fees.  Don’t know if ones in that section are even available any more, but I wasn’t about to F around and wait until the week before the game to buy tix. 

  5. 37 minutes ago, TheyCallMeAndy said:

    Don't look at top teams, look at those who go furthest in the playoffs. 
     

    Philly played more games than anyone. They had 1 player over 90% of the snaps. 3 in the 80%. 1 in 70%.
     

    The WR with the most snaps was 69%, then 66% and 58%. Their QB played 80%. 
     

    Cheifs played a ton. 
     

    90% 5 (4 OL and Patty)
    80% 1 (Kelce)

    70% NONE

    60% 2 

     

    Highest WR snap counts were 65%, 59%, and 36%

     

    Commies:

     

    90% 3 (QB and 2 OL)
    80% 2 (1 WR)
    70% 1
    60% 3 (2 TEs)

     

    Next WRs were in the 40s

     

    ProFootballReference has snap count data, feel free to comb through it last year. 

    I did use pro football reference.  Cute that you only used the two super teams and ignored some other playoff teams that did have a WR over 80%.  

  6. 6 minutes ago, TheyCallMeAndy said:

    You need to manage snaps and hits. 

    BS. Go look at the snap counts for the top WR’s.  Only looked at a handful and all were 80-90%…some over 90!  
     

    Do teams manage snap counts for OL? CB? QB?

  7. 47 minutes ago, SunDSolar said:

    Coleman 70%

    Shakir 61%

    Knox 52%

    Kincaid 49%

    Palmer 48%

     

    Can we stop with the constant personal changes.  No team in the league does this

     

    Shakir and Kincaid should be in the game well over 80% of the time. 

     

    61% & 49% is insane for our two best surehanded pass catchers

     

    The “everybody eats” never made any sense.  Put your best players on the field!
     

    I agree…Shakir and Kincaid should be north of 80% each and every game.  

    • Like (+1) 5
×
×
  • Create New...