Kemp

False propoganda? The Steele dossier, also known as the Trump–Russia dossier,[1] is a controversial political opposition research report written from June to December 2016, containing allegations of misconduct, conspiracy, and cooperation between Donald Trump's presidential campaign and the government of Russia prior to and during the 2016 election campaign.[2] Several key allegations made in June 2016 were later corroborated by the January 2017 report by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence,[3][4] namely that Vladimir Putin favored Trump over Hillary Clinton;[3][5] that he personally ordered an "influence campaign" to harm Clinton's campaign and to "undermine public faith in the US democratic process"; that he ordered cyberattacks on both parties;[3] and that many Trump campaign officials and associates had numerous secretive contacts with Russian agents.[6][7] While Steele's documents played a significant role in initially highlighting the general friendliness between Trump and the Putin administration, the veracity of specific allegations is highly variable. Some have been publicly confirmed,[4][8][3][5] others are plausible but not specifically confirmed,[9][10] and some are dubious in retrospect but not strictly disproven.[11][12][13] They were there to "protest" solely because Trump lied about the election results in order to overthrow the election. You keep leaving that part out.

The guy above you in the thread is intellectually honest. You, on the other hand, proved what you are, yet again.

Thank you.

At least you said you have no problem with it. That's refreshing.

It's a simple question. Can you answer it? Would anyone have stormed the Capitol if Trump hadn't claimed hundreds of times that the election was stolen from them?

https://www.mediamatters.org/eric-trump/hitler-promoting-antisemites-will-speak-trumps-miami-hotel-alongside-eric-trump-lara?fbclid=IwAR0nvVnqqFv1izYONVArxbZ8fG11G5hTql_KKHq9YQvfKB_njP00Mt6-BuQ What is this mutual admiration thing between Trump and Nazis?

Someone shouldn't be able to be paid for writing a book? Should this apply to all in Congress, as well?

Pretending to be a simpleton is odd behavior. If Trump hadn't claimed over and over that the election was stolen and called for his followers to be there, J6 never happens. He wanted them to stop certification and praised them for the attempt. He's still praising them. That's your guy. https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2023/05/05/fulton-county-georgia-trump-investigation-electors-immunity/?utm_source=alert&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=wp_news_alert_revere&location=alert Little fish turning on big fish. The noose tightens, The walls be closing.

He was accepting hundreds of thousands of dollars and perhaps more, and hiding it. So, you're okay with buying supreme Court Justices? If there's nothing wrong with what he did, why did he hide it? If Soros had done the same for a Dem justice, the investigations would already be underway in Congress and you and yours would be throwing hissy fits.

Since you can't bring yourself to say it. They were there because Trump told them that the election was stolen from them. That's the only reason they were there.

I didn't think you'd admit that Thomas's votes were being bought by a donor.

Why were they to protest? Who told them to be there? You can say it.

After reading what you're talking about I see that Sotomayor was paid for writing books. What service did Thomas provide to receive houses and trips and tuition? You understand the difference. You just can't face it. It must be tough to live a series of lies. The hits just keep on coming. https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2023/05/04/leonard-leo-clarence-ginni-thomas-conway/

A minority? I haven't seen a breakdown of the numbers. So, I've asked a few times. How about an answer? Why were the crowds there? Flagpoles were used as weapons, but the greater threat came from Republicans who refused to accept the results and illegally appointed illegal sets of electors. Right or wrong? I understand that staying on topic hurts your cause. Westside still thinks it was Antifa. Even Doc thinks he's an idiot.

At least you don't claim it was a tourism event like many on your team.

Lobbyists paying members of Congress to do things is bad. Until now, it was assumed the Supreme Court was above this. Back to my point. What would the reaction of Trump supporters and Republicans be if Kagan was being fiscally supported by Soros? Hell, they lost their bowels about Bragg being a a small part of a small donation by Soros. Were you troubled by that?

Um, the ones who tried to overthrow the government were the Republicans who tried to inject phony electors and not approve the election results. The violent dolts were trying to help. You really didn't know that?

When you try to overthrow a government at the behest of a criminal, stuff happens.

Stupid AND criminal. I have to give you credit for admitting it was Trump supporters. Some of your buddies here can't admit that. Congrats on showing some integrity. BTW, why do you think they were there that day?

As long as you've got things plugged up, I'm fine with it. And, it's great that you can't even try to disagree with what I posted earlier. Good to see you understand what's happening in court. Tough day for you and your seditionist friends.

Sorry about how small it is.

Can you imagine the reaction from the Republicans and the Trumpers here if it came out that Soros was buying houses for Kagan? They would be pushing each other out of the way to get to the microphones to condemn Kagan. Crickets for Thomas.

So, at this point you would at least concede that the folks who stormed the Capitol WERE Trump supporters and not Antifa, and that in their minds they thought Trump gave them the instructions to do so. Sedition. They're getting closer.

Seditious conspiracy. Seditious conspiracy.

Any knuckleheads left here still saying Antifa was behind January 6?