aussiebills
-
Posts
456 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by aussiebills
-
-
we got to go OT in the 2nd if we want a starter unglamorous but then again when has Buffalo been glamorous
-
Gilmore's aggressive going at the ball and at the player is great ecspecially with byrd and Wilson covering behind him
-
U got to think jeffery upshaw or David would last to us
-
There has been a lot of strange selections Irvin, jenkins weeden
-
If upshaw gets through to the 2nd round we need to trade up and get him
-
Trade back in for hightower
-
If that happens this will be a great pick
-
Gilmore makes sense with McGee close to being gone and Florence on the back of a bad year this makes sense
-
But not under sized !
True and am I the only one who is gonna get dreadies like gilmore
-
I hope we do it would be a nice addition
-
He plays with attitude I like it
-
I didn't like him until I watched that he can tackle he can cover he is super quick wow I like this pick
-
scrap all of what i have said no blackmon or Kalil
-
There is numerous options to trade up for both the players.
We could move up to No. 3 overall to draft Kalil or Blackmon (most likely Kalil)
I have heard that we could be open to trading our 2nd rounder and 1st rounder for that 3rd pick (http://www.sbnation.com/2012-nfl-draft/2012/4/25/2975605/2012-nfl-draft-rumors-matt-kalil-buffalo-bills)
My theory is that one of them will last to the 7 slot. I think this is where we could make a play for one of them. Jaguars will be looking for Blackmon or Kalil but if we give them trade that they can't turn down we could get one of them for great value like maybe 1,3,4b for there 7 slot.
Just my take cant wait for the draft
-
I have also read read somewhere that the bills were going to pull a surprise if a certain player was on the board. I instantly thought tannehill but it could be Gilmore as well, but that is way less of a surprise
-
Any reason why Gilmore is in front of keuchly
-
Nix wants to win now (according to other posters) so tannehill makes no sense
-
By that draft value chart , isn't #10 (1300) plus #74 (220) good enough (1520 > 1500)? That doesn't seem like a bad deal...
That is a trade I would make gladly
-
Disagree. High motor, low impact 4-3 LB is poor value at #10.
I would agree with you because we should be targeting a game changer at 10. But with NE (gronk, hernandez) NYJ (Keller) in our division, kuechly will be a game changer with his coverage skills, he could really add an asset to our defense. He can play three downs caz as you said he is high motor
-
Depends on who Nix is really targeting at #10. I would trade Kuechly and #41 for Kalil in a heartbeat.... Floyd and #41, maybe not.
Floyd is nowhere near as valuable as Kuechly
-
He was 6-3-242 at the Combine...
Yep bigger than Willis
-
Kuechly can play outside cause he can cover and he is quick to do so
-
Reiff would be a major disappointment. When your picking in the top ten, the guy MUST be a blue chip prospect. Reiff is not.
Exactly it Must be a BLUE CHIPPER and Kuechly is a BLUE CHIPPER
-
Giants
49ers
Then us
Draft Coverage: Venue of Choice
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
Gruden and Berman make the draft for me