sherpa
-
Posts
3,659 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by sherpa
-
-
29 minutes ago, Governor said:
It was his “made for tv”event.
You haven't answered the question.
What carrier was it?
By the way, all offensive launches are filmed.
On aircraft carriers, all operations are filmed.
Again, what ship was that?
10 minutes ago, Governor said:Do I look like the Secretary of Navy? Am I reporting from the Pentagon?
Who cares what it was shot from? It was a totally fake mission.
And of course you know that, as you knew it was launched from a carrier.
This crap gets annoying.
People who know nothing about any of this posting nonsense based on their political leanings.
Know why Trump, Obama, and Biden have trouble living up to their campaign promises about "ending" wars, reducing troop deployments and a host of other things?
Because once they actually get in the seat and are faced with reality, they make appropriate judgements.
Usually, they are the right choices.
This Biden thing is the exception, in my view.
Absolutely stupid to say we are going to do something by Aug 31.
But, that's my view, as opposed to posting nonsense about things that didn't happen.
By the way, the US doesn't launch Tomahawks from aircraft carriers.
-
11 minutes ago, Governor said:
It was his “made for tv” event.
Evidently you could not provide the answer, so I'll do it for you.
The missile launch was from the USS Porter, a guided missile destroyer.
It was not from an aircraft carrier, per your claim, and it was in response to another event.
People pay attention to false claims.
-
Just now, Governor said:
I can’t remember. It was early in Trump’s presidency. It was very staged, almost North Korea style. The flag was off in the distance. Very weird.
It was an empty airport in Syria.
I'm not interested in the target.
I'm interested in your claim that missiles were launched from a carrier.
I can't recall that, and I am interested to know.
-
1 hour ago, Governor said:
Remember the cameras they set up so we could see the missiles shot from the carrier?
When did this occur?
Not saying it didn't, but what carrier?
-
2 hours ago, Niagara Bill said:
It was both leadership and Intel.
20 yrs. They should know what kind of toilet paper the wife of each terrorist prefer by now.
Your reports came from the same organization. Every idiot who can read knew that an attack either by the Taliban militia or ISIS was quite probable. That is like predicting it will likely snow in Buffalo in Dec.
They had no idea who, where, when or how until it happened. Total intel failure. 20 Flippin yrs Sherpa. Even you should be disappointed.
That does not make Biden any less responsible.
I am quite sure you have no knowledge of what you speak.
Not worth responding to.
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, BillStime said:
How many of the 5,000 incarcerated Taliban prisoners that Trump released were involved with this attack?
Just guessing, but probably none, since it wasn't Taliban.
Or to stroke a Dem talking point, probably all 5000.
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Niagara Bill said:
This is based on intelligence from an organization that did not predict the swift Taliban take over and did not have enough intelligence info after 20 years to predict the attack at the airport.
Really?
I was reading reports that stated intel that there was an imminent attack two days before this, on of all things, social media.
This wasn't an intel failure.
This was a leadership failure.
-
1
-
1
-
-
I really think the reaction to this, while valid, is missing the point, and the only solution.
Folks are blaming bad behavior by inhuman punks on politicians in the US.
Of course it could have been handled better, and I did not vote for Trump, Clinton, or Biden.
Still, the point isn't that those folks screwed up.
The point is that fundamentalist lunatics in the Muslim faith are getting support and supplies from somebody else.
They are incapable of producing military hardware, or in this case, simplistic weapons.
It seems the focus is on ISIS Khorasan, known as Isis K.
This is Pakistan supported.
There are two countries who support this kind of madness, not as a national posture, but under the sheets.
Iran and Pakistan.
That is where the international community needs to bring to accountability.
You can run one US president after another up the flagpole and it isn't going to matter.
The solution lies in eliminating support.
-
1
-
1
-
-
33 minutes ago, Niagara Bill said:
Sorry, no you did not beat the he'll out of them. You are fighting an army without uniforms. 20 yrs and no knowledge of these terrorist groups. No infiltration.
You left behind more weapons and equipment.
2 trillion dollars, and they are shooting you in the back as you leave.
The money could have built a country not support the military contractors.
Now we have more dead military.
I am sorry for you.
We beat the hell out of them.
You are a pathetic idiot.
-
1
-
1
-
-
4 hours ago, Bidens_basement said:
Who or what do you bomb? It’s already a pile of rocks. Twenty years couldn’t beat them, not sure what else they could do different? It’s a total fubar now.
We beat the hell out of them, at every level, unlike the Soviets.
What we didn't do is eliminate them.
Elimination means eliminating support.
The Taliban/ISIS does not provide military equipment support.
Other operators do.
When we are ready to eliminate that support, we will end the problem.
One man's view.
-
1
-
1
-
-
7 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:
There's not much you can do to prevent suicide bombings. I just can't believe we're trusting the Taliban to properly search everyone. Why did anyone think it was a smart idea to trust the Taliban?
There is certainly something you can do to respond to those attacks.
These are funded and supplied.
I am quite certain those that fund them are known.
Respond with deadly force.
We are over trying to win a political game.
If the specifics are wrong, so be it.
The effect is the same.
This cannot go unresponded to.
-
4 minutes ago, Artful Dodger said:
Don't you think the administration has already lost the military? This level of incompetence is almost beyond belief. Every decision they've made has gone wrong.
I don't know.
I'm less connected than I used to be.
I am certain that if this is not responded to, and I'm sure it will, that eventuality will occur.
-
This clearly bothers me, but doesn't surprise me.
I offer my opinion as a guy who sat in a ready room on an aircraft carrier with the ability to deliver unspeakable harm to the enemies of the US.
Nothing gets the juices going like knowing there are troops on the ground that are being hit.
There is no better mission than protecting American soldiers in the dirt.
Did the TopGun thing. Taught it.
It's fun, but protecting troops on the ground is like protecting your daughter from assault.
It is the single most motivating mission you can do, worth giving your life for, and watching Marines die while you could have stopped it is vomit inducing.
This has to be responded to, quickly, or this administration will lose the military.
-
1
-
4
-
-
Just now, Chef Jim said:
Oh no I don't disagree. I just wanted clarification.
I know.
I get you.
If true, this simply cannot go unresponded to, and with undeniable force.
-
Just now, Chef Jim said:
Why is this a game changer? How does it change the game?
Again, I don't know if it's true.
But....
If US troops were killed during a "negotiated" withdrawal, there absolutely has to be a response.
It must be strong and it must come quick.
Sorry, but that is the reality.
-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, RiotAct said:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/afghanistan-kabul-airport-explosion-11629976397
Four U.S. Marines killed, as per preliminary reports.
If this is true, this is a game changer.
-
I think Allen needs this from a psychological point.
Coming into a home game at the opener for the first time in two years, his too amped up persona would show.
Get him in. Get him in front of the home crowd for two series and hope that he isn't nuclear against the Steelers.
-
5
-
-
Bruce working during preseason is oxymoronic, incongruous and contradictory at the same time.
-
1
-
8
-
-
23 minutes ago, Utah John said:
What also caught my attention was that there was a direct flight from Raleigh to Buffalo. I don't live in Buffalo anymore but for years it's seemed like you couldn't fly directly from Buffalo to anywhere except Chicago and few other major hubs. Buffalo is a great place to live but the lack of direct flights is a negative for the city.
Raleigh was a major hub for American in the 80's.
The Buffalo market has declined dramatically since the 70's.
Used to be a DC10 from Chicago in the early evening.
Now it's basically regional jets.
-
I wonder if Bass can handle a snap and punt.
Admittedly, a Sunday afternoon musing.
So far, not a "Haaker."
-
When I was a 727 captain, had him on a flight from Fort Myers to Raleigh to Buffalo.
On the flight from Ft. Myers to Raleigh, a young harried mom had an infant who screamed the entire flight, irritating some other passengers nearby, who exhibited irritation towards the mom, who had tried her hardest to hardest to quiet the child.
It turns out that both this wonderful mom and her kid were going on to Buffalo, as was Maguire.
In Raleigh, Paul paid to upgrade the mom and her infant to first class.
The baby slept the entire way.
I had no idea this had happened until a flight attendant told me, and I had no idea he was aboard until she pointed out the nice guy that did that as they were leaving.
Of course I recognized him.
Judge people by how they treat people when nobody is watching.
Just a really nice guy.
-
2
-
4
-
-
12 minutes ago, DCbillsfan said:
I was focused on the Bills oline. The starting 5 was Dawkins, Feliciano, Bates, Ford, and Brown. Brown played a few series at RT and moved over to LT. Doyle came in at RT for Brown. Hart came in later and was called for holding on a play. Looks like Hart was dropped down the depth chart.
Both Morse and Darryl Williams sat out this game. Boettger played both LG and RG.
Looks like Bills are leaning towards 9 OL. Dawkins, Feliciano, Morse, Ford, Williams, Boettger, Brown, Doyle, and Bates.
Great post.
I like what I saw from the defensive line today, as we all did, but I think the offensive production, and especially keeping Josh healthy, is dependent on the offensive line.
Using second stringers, getting first downs time after time, it is exciting to consider what Diggs and Beas can do.
-
1
-
-
Only thing that has stopped the Bills are the Blue Angels.
-
2
-
4
-
-
41 minutes ago, Niagara Bill said:
Yes he is and is responsible, but would you not trust a general and state dept who have been there 20 frigging years. Fire them all, embarrass them all publicly.
Follow the money. It looks like the trillions were stolen and not used.
Must be Mad Dog and trumps boys....😁😁😁😁😁😁
You are absolutely clueless on how this country works, and how this thing has been handled.
What you post are conclusions based on zero knowledge and demonstrate gross ignorance.
-
1
-
Afghanistan
in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Posted
I am not "upset" about anything.
You post relatively strong views from a political stance.
That draws attention.
When you post a ridiculous claim, someone who might know something about that kind of stuff might notice.
What you posted is silly.
Much less "mad" than I was when Clinton did what Clinton did along the same lines, or when Carter crafted the disaster in Iran.
Totally stupid.
I'm just interested in getting the facts right, which you did not.
Enjoy your day.