Jump to content

sherpa

Community Member
  • Posts

    3,659
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by sherpa

  1. I have never claimed "superior knowledge."

    You post goofy, uninformed crap and I have responded to it.

     

    Suggesting that we should deploy two Air Force squadrons to the Ukraine as a deterrent was crazy.

    Suggesting that the US provide and enforce a no fly zone was crazy.

    Suggesting that we can launch the current  HIMARS derivative from an airplane is crazy.

    Suggesting that it might be a good idea to provide them with A-10's or any other US tactical airplane is crazy.

     

    That is not acting superior. That was pointing out the wackiness of these ideas, and that is supported by links that discuss a few of those issues in detail, by knowledgeable folks who deal in this every day. 

     

    Regarding the veracity of my background, as you recall, or probably forgot, I offered a significant amount of money to be donated to any charity of your choosing if I was being untruthful, and I can easily prove it. You never responded, and I simply don't care.

     

     

     

     

  2. 2 hours ago, Tiberius said:

    But you also said you knew what Thomas Jefferson would think about Joe Biden, so I'll just say I am dubious of any claims some possible crank makes on internet message boards. It's not uncommon at all for people to claim stuff like this 

     

    Did you earn any medals during your service? 

     

    Do you agree with the supreme court decision striking down the Stolen Valor act of 2005? 

     

    If you want to continue this personal vein, message me.

    I can provide proof of what I stated.

     

  3. 3 hours ago, Tiberius said:

    Oh yes, no mistake in throwing out the justly deserved insults. 

     

    You have any proof you taught at Top Gun or any of these others things you say you did? I will say I am sorry for the liar part if you prove you say who you are. You can do it without showing any private info, be safe! But maybe a few pics of you over time with name blotted out? 

     

    Of course I have proof.

    Logbook entries, flight jackets with the Topgun patch and US Navy officer fitness reports that mention it.

    By the way, you didn't accuse me of lying about that school.

    You accused me of lying about serving on an aircraft carrier.

    Remember that picture on page 130 of this forum?

    Guess who that was?

    Guess where that was taken?

    Here's a hint.

    Those are live weapons. You can tell because there are yellow stripes painted around their noses.

    If you look closely, you can see that the airplane is chained down to an aircraft carrier.

     

     

    I didn't "teach" at Topgun.

    I went through there as an adversary, one of the "bad guys" who run those air to air sorties, brief and debrief them.

    I taught at Light Attack Weapons School, while serving in the adversary role, opposing US forces, which you had to be a Topgun graduate to do..

    I taught through lectures, US and Soviet air to air missiles, and Soviet surface to air missile systems, then opposed them as they flew their training strikes, using known and postulated Soviet tactics.

    How to defeat theirs and how to use ours.

     

     

    • Awesome! (+1) 1
  4. 40 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

    Fair enough. I guess I was wrong. I can admit that. 

     

     

     

     

     

    People make mistakes all the time.

    Calling someone who has spent more time efforting against Putin and his lot infinitely more than you ever have a "coward," idiot," "liar," and most recently a "scumbag." is something entirely different.

    That is not a "mistake."

    That is grossly insulting, pathetic, and draws attention to crazy notions you post.

     

    Years spent on active duty planning to fight his group, teaching others as a Topgun adversary and Light Attack Weapons Scholl instructor makes me cringe when I see crazy stuff posted.

    To top it off, having my Moscow hotel room gone though in my absences on two separate occasions, as well as other crew members who indicated former military service on their Russian visa applications allows me to dislike that place and regime as much as anybody.

     

    • Awesome! (+1) 2
    • Thank you (+1) 1
  5. 15 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

    I can't find it, just saw it in passing. Maybe I even read it wrong. Not sure 

     

     

    This argues its was a Neptune 

     

     

     

    You can't find it?

    Or it doesn't exist.

     

    I've found it for you.

    Here's the procedure for launching a HIMARS off an aircraft.

     

    1. Select which wing you want blown off.

    2. Arm HIMARS on that station.

    3. Grab ejection lower handle.

    4. Launch HIMARS while pulling ejection handle prior to wing being blown off as result of launch.

     

    You are good at this.

    • Haha (+1) 1
  6. 14 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

     

    I was at camp today, I go once a year, and it would be ridiculous to post stats like you're asking for. Every time I go I'm reminded how difficult it is to get a true read on things, although the various commentators that cover the team do their best. The players are constantly switching out, there's not always full effort or tackling, the practice situations vary wildly - nothing about training camp is conducive to building momentum like you would in a real game. Plus it's hard to watch a live play once and follow everything that's happening. The best I can do is choose to focus on one specific player or matchup. Preseason is more helpful because at least we can watch live game reps and go back to rewatch different players in their matchups. Training camp observations are mostly just helpful for figuring out where players rank on the depth chart and how certain players are being used.

     

    Best post.

    Too many people trying to monetize observations on issues they they nothing about.

     

     

  7. Always amazing to assign monthly economic numbers to political issues.

    We shut down the economy for over a year. We've spent about three trillion dollars trying to re-stimulate it.

    These numbers are no sign of achievement. They are to be expected.

     

    Labor participation rate is a better indicator than unemployment, but nobody pays attention to it if their focus is on political promotion.

  8. 10 hours ago, Coffeesforclosers said:

     

    Its got to be an equipment thing. We're not at war, and we train pilots for our allies all the time.

     

    The Ukrainians dont have to qualify top gun, the just have to be better than the Russians flying against Ukraine. 

     

    It is way more complicated than simply training pilots. They have no ability to maintain them or arm them.

    We are already deeply involved in this, draining our own war stock with massive supply of arms.

    The Harry S. Truman is reportedly flying 80 sorties a day in support of this.

    That is a massive and unsustainable pace, as well as rapidly using up service life of these airplanes.

    (That, by the way, was a major issue in enforcing the the Iraqi no fly zone and part of the calculus to inform the decision to invade, though not often mentioned).

     

    For what I think is a reasonable explanation of these issues, and certainly describes my view,  here is a link to a very recent youtube discussing it.

    The guys talking are a retired F-14 RIO, (back seater), who is extremely well informed on current military aviation issues and a Reservist Naval Intel Officer.

    It is well worth listening to for those who do not know what is involved in something like this and just want to "do somethng."

     

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Su34D4KnO6s&t=1227s

     

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Thank you (+1) 1
  9. 1 hour ago, ChiGoose said:

     

    Ah, I didn't realize they had changed their minds. I recall them asking for F-15's and F-16's, but the Biden administration was worried about them using the planes to strike inside Russian territory.

     

    In any case, they need to be able to destroy Russian artillery to level the playing field. HIMARS seem to be doing a good deal there, but they only have a couple and Russians are already adjusting their tactics.

     

    They have no way of using any of these aircraft effectively, on so many levels

    Giving them those airplanes would be a big mistake

  10. 2 minutes ago, GaryPinC said:

    Trump has his share of blame also, but the entire operation was rotten from Bush through Biden.  While women's rights and education took a huge, temporary leap forward, we failed as a nation to facilitate a better way for the population of Afghanistan.  They were so quick to abdicate to the Taliban.  All 4 presidents failed in their own way.  

     

    I think this is one of the issues that people who live in the west will never comprehend.

    Afghanistan is not a country in the manner of how we view countries.

    It is a tribal, nomadic group of clans with no common purpose other than survival.

     

    It was that way when the Russians invaded in 1980 and it is that way now.

     

    There is no way that any optimistic, come to the 21th century influence from the west was going to change that.

    Never has.

     

    The only way it can be dealt with is to eliminate the threats that occasionally emerge from there.

     

    Still, the "withdrawal" of our forces from there should have cost the SecDef his job.

    Just a total debacle by any objective measure.

    • Agree 4
  11. 1 hour ago, dpberr said:

     

    It's just very...neat. On the other hand, the US dropped two 500lb bombs on a single house to kill al-Zarqawi in Iraq, and sent special operations into someone else's country to kill bin Laden.

     

    As time has gone on, one of the more uncomfortable realizations I've had as an adult is that 9/11 may not be what we've (American public) been told.    

     

    I'm not sure of your logic here.

    Getting Zarqawi, and the weapons used, was a vastly different circumstance and operation.

    Regarding 9/11, I think you should remain "comfortable" about the conclusions. 

    • Like (+1) 1
  12. 39 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:


    Takes a twisted mind to think up these things…

     

    On the other hand a reasonable corollary is that it takes a responsible gov/military to spend the money to get this to production.

    It is basically an airborne assassin aimed to get one person.

     

    Far more humanitarian than lobbing artillery shells or cluster bombs, which would kill everything within a football field area.

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Agree 1
×
×
  • Create New...