Jump to content

Dragonborn10

Community Member
  • Posts

    4,691
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Dragonborn10

  1. guy made a comment that he is an african on a journey. he was born in in california in 1993. how is he an african? i you are born here...you are an american right? i do not get this.

     

    Try being black in America for a year and you might understand
  2. It use to be right tackles and interior lineman were considered plug and play positions esp if they were drafted high. But O-line play in college is mostly built around the spread offense so there is a serious issue with O-linemen needing more time to develop their fundamentals. Hopefully as Dawkins develops he can help anchor that position.

    Agreed. The bust rate for O-line in the first two rounds seems to have increased. Perhaps Walter Jones, Jonathan Ogden, Orlando Pace, and Joe Thomas have been the outliers and all along the bust rate has been the same. For a while though it seemed if you got a LT high in the draft you were set for years. See Mike Williams for the exception....

  3. Great post

    I just don't see our offense and specifically the passing game predominantly 5 and 7 step drops. There are myriad reasons for this. First the right side of the line is not good at pass blocking. Second they have at best average deep threats. Third even as a TT supporter, I don't tihnk his game should be deep crosses or deep outs. I think(hope) TT's game evolves to seeing the whole field better and they take advantage of Clay and the slot WR abilities this offense has. To me that means more three step drops, quick throws out of the shotgun or pistol, and moving the pocket.

    If I am wrong and they ask TT and the OL to utilize 7 step drop backs and deep route concepts, then who is really to blame? Posters bash the run heavy 1970's offense. Well a passing game based on 7 step drops is also a relic of the past

  4. I hope to god they do not package their pick and KC's pick and try to move up in the draft. That would defeat they whole purpose. This team needs talent in multiple spots.

    If they had a scond pick in the first round they could have had a QB (my preference being Kizer) and White.

    If TT struggles, they can go after Cousins( I would not) or still get a QB with their own pick. That KC pick can then be traded down for multiple other picks.

  5.  

    This is completely incorrect. It isn't GM speak or a buzz phrase. It's a team building approach that is still wildly misunderstood by this fanbase.

     

    Everything may revolve around the QB, but you still need to build a team around him. The Saints are a great, shining example on how to waste the career of a HOF QB. Trying to find a franchise QB in FA is a huge longshot. This isn't the 80s, 90s, or even the early 2000s. Our next franchise QB is going to have to come through the draft, and it's better to have 10 picks going into April than it is to have 6.

    Actually I'm entirely correct. Half your post proves my points.

    The Saints won a SB with a FA QB. Not sure how that was a waste?

    And yes it is better to have more picks. That is what I said. It is more lottery than science. They wasted four picks on Ragland.

    There are multiple means to build a team. Belichick did it via FA and trades. Seahawks have done it through the draft. Denver made two SB's with a FA QB and good draft choices.

    Further, let's just look at it from a numbers standpoint. 7 picks a year for four years (average NFL career being just 3.3 years) is only 28 players or little more than half a team. Even if your top three picks were starters every year for four years in a row (which likely has never happened) that would be 12 players. Barely enough for one side of the ball.

    So the draft is just one tactic in building a team. It is a very good one if done correctly especially in a salary cap league. Teams need good young but more importantly cheap talent. But there are multiple tactics used to build a team. Perhaps the best player the Bills have signed in the last 20 years was an UDFA TE that will be a borderline HOF LT.

     

    And lastly, Brady is the proof that the draft means nothing. The Patriots had no clue Brady was to become the greatest of all time. If they had any idea he was even going to be a competent back-up they would have taken him three rounds earlier. If you said, draft a QB every year, I would have no problem with that strategy. Just trade down at least once per year and take a flyer on a QB every year until you find one.

  6. Cold weather teams play better in cold weather


    Turnovers being an important key to who wins and loses, and halftime adjustments, are not myths.

    Interceptions are important. Fumbles are luck.


    you also have the

     

    "Pin them deep crowd" on punts on the other side of the 50 (though I think that crowd is getting less and less)

    Down, distance, game situation, and opponent all play a factor here. In general most NFL coaches are risk averse and yards/first downs don't come as easily as they do in college.

    But in general I agree with your point. NFL coaches should take a few more chances. It really isn't even that much a risk on say third and two to go for it twice. The probability of getting two yards in two plays in the NFL must be greater than 70%.

  7. You don't build through the draft. That is all BS. It is GM speak to make themselves more important than they are. The draft is a total lottery. No one is any better at it than anyone else. Whaley's biggest fault was giving away picks. The more picks you have the more chances you have to draft good players

     

    The only position that matters is QB. Green Bay lucked out and had the guts to take Rodgers with Favre still on the team. Pats lucked out with Brady. Niners traded for Steve Young. Packers traded for Favre. Seahawks got a great one in the third round. New Orleans signed a HOF QB in FA. Cardinals just saw their former QB make the HOF, again signed in Free Agency.

     

    It is not the draft. The draft is great entertainment but it is not the answer to building a team.

     

    The ONLY answer is to find a franchise QB by any means necessary. Then find all the other parts in any manner you choose - draft, cheap FA, expensive FA, re-sign your own draft picks, trade, and waiver wire. There are HOF players and Wall of fame players that have been acquired by all these methods.

  8. Mills was terrible in pass blocking but a sevicable run blocker. Dawkins looks terrible so far. Most 2nd round pick OT, should be abel to beat out Mills. That said he was forced to play at LT while RG was a revolving door. Not exactly conducive to learning the RT position.

    Best case scenario is they work Dawkins in for a few series here and there, and also line him up as a third OT in certain packages.

    The real decision will come in week 5. Do they keep Henderson, Mills, or the waiver wire pick-up?

    As an aside, I don't understand why Groy didn't get snaps at RT in camp. He is 6'5" and played a couple games at LT in college. Maybe he would be terrible but it would have been interesting to see.

    And I am still beating the dead horse of Glenn to RT and CK at LT was the best 5, along with Richie, Wood(Groy), and Miller. I will concede Glenn is a very good LT but the drop off to CK was simply not that much while any player they have had at RT (including CK) has consistently been one of the worst in the league.

  9. Proof claimed two TEs.

     

    Awarded one not awarded one.

     

    Then signed one to PS. So yes i said thomas and O'Leary might not be as secure as people think.

     

    And then said learn the NFL rules.

     

    So they tried to claim TWO TEs.

     

    You think they would roll with 5TEs on the roster. Maybe

     

     

     

    Once a club waives a player, the 31 other clubs either file a claim to obtain him or they waive their chance to do so (thus the origin of the term waiver).

     

    http://operations.nfl.com/updates/the-players/nfl-waiver-system-overview/

     

    But i get it there are a group of posters that have hard-ons for my posts

    Your link does not state anything to the fact that the team must put the claimed player on their roster.

    There is nothing stopping the team from putting in multiple claims and if the team is awarded both, immediately waiving one of the two.

  10. Flutie

    Taylor

    Fitz

    Bledsoe

    Orton

     

    I beg you guys to go back and look at Bledsoe's Bills tenure after the 1st half of the 1st year. He was AWFUL. We remember his tenure way more fondly than we should.

    Same can be said for Orton. Had Sammy not made that incredible behind him one handed catch on the final drive against Detroit, Orton may not have started again. Add the **** show he put on at Oakland, a game I flew from Portland to see that cost us the playoffs. He was mostly awful but with this list still is top 10. Vomit in my mouth

    When I think of Bledsoe I think 2004 season. After a slow start in part due to some bad luck/bad calls (push out in EZ), we turned it on. Drew played well as we won 8 out of 10 or whatever it was. I was at the Seattle game where we trounced a playoff team. Not sure what his stats or DVAO was, but we were winning and he was doing his part.

     

    That's what I base my #4 rating on.

    I was at Seattle game too

    Drew did not play well against the Steelers though. He needed to win that game somehow

×
×
  • Create New...