Jump to content

Dablitzkrieg

Community Member
  • Posts

    5,870
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Dablitzkrieg

  1. 7 minutes ago, DCbillsfan said:

    A bunch of head coach firings - Browns, Packers, Bengals, Fish, Jets, Broncos, and Bucs.  Maybe the Cardinals

     

    Frazier and Daboll in all likelihood will get some interviews for HC jobs.  McDermott needs to have some guys in mind as replacements.

     

    Plus there has to be a special teams coach out there to replace Crossman, right?

    I'm confident that McD is more prepared than you are giving him credit for.

    3 minutes ago, oldmanfan said:

    Frazier will get interviews.  Rooney rule.

    Pretty shallow perspective right here

  2. 1 minute ago, zow2 said:

    At this point is Kiko even much different than Vontaze Burfict ?   I mean c'mon, even when Kiko doesn't land a direct hit he seems to give that little extra side business that the fans rarely see.  

    Very Good point.  Something is wrong with the guy.  He has many of these.  Edelman too!  Just a plain dirty player trying to injure someone!

  3. On ‎12‎/‎24‎/‎2018 at 5:54 PM, BillsSB2020 said:

    I wish Ruben Foster would a had a pair of those shades when the ball got lost in the sun.? It seems to be that Edmunds is a fresh faced rookie and the expectation is that it will all slow down for him next season. Perhaps they need a run plugger for the middle and a jackrabbit out of the backfield to shore up the middle areas but those guys are usually available on the open market. 

    I think you mean Robert

  4. 2 minutes ago, MrEpsYtown said:

     

    I am sorry if I offended, but I simply don't believe this guy and I think a lot of people have a hard time believing him. I didn't mean to offend, I was simply stating that a lot of people don't recognize Gordon's issues as a mental health issue. Are those people wrong? Yes. Is he lying? In my opinion, probably. Should he be given the benefit of the doubt? At this point, I say no. That's kind of where I stand on Gordon's situation, so I apologize if I hit a nerve. I just think that it is situations like his that cause people to lack sensitivity for mental health issues. 

    Apology accepted.  My reaction was too harsh.  We can agree to disagree.

    • Like (+1) 3
  5. 1 minute ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

     

    I agree. It's a really uneducated and ignorant POV to express.

    I apologize for my previous posts, but will not delete them, hope they aren't too harsh, but this is obviously something I am hypersensitive about.  I worked in the field for close to 16 years and if you truly understood addiction, it is way more than simply making a choice.

    • Like (+1) 3
  6. 7 minutes ago, MrEpsYtown said:

     

    He smokes pot and is using mental health as an excuse. One of the reasons people struggle recognizing mental health as a legit issue is the guys like this who will use it as a crutch. 

    you have no idea what the hell you are talking about.  I suggest you shut up on the subject!

    7 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

     

    So a guy who battles an addiction problem is a loser?

    Absolutely not.  Speaking as someone with close to 14 years of sobriety, it absolutely amazes me, the idiots on this board that are so narrow-minded, living in a bubble, that really have no idea what addiction or mental health really is.

    • Like (+1) 2
    • Thank you (+1) 2
  7. 8 hours ago, TheFunPolice said:

    Troy Aikman

    Joe Montana

    Jim Kelly

     

    All never hit 4000 yards in a 16 game season, yet all 3 are Hall of Fame QBs known for running explosive  and innovative offenses decades after Namath played. 

     

    Doesn't seem possible but it's true. 

     

    Elway just broke 4000 one time in his career.

     

    To me that puts that 4000 yard season back in 1967 when they only played 14 games in perspective, and I'm no Namath fan. 

     

     

    They go by career, not one year.  Great year, but overrated

    1 hour ago, BurpleBull said:

     

    He's an old, ranting, white man whose fixation on the past, clouds how he views present-day NFL players and the league as a whole.

     

    Forgive him.

    What the hell does white have to do with it?  

  8. 8 hours ago, HomeskillitMoorman said:

    From having an injured kicker go for a 54 yarder to the 2 runs on 1st and 2nd at the Jets 23 on the second to last drive...this conservative garbage is so incredibly frustrating. I just don't understand it. Is the point of the game to keep it close or to go for the win? Even when we're 4-8 the guy just won't go for it. Give Allen more than 1 shot on that set of downs to make a play. Stop playing for a field goal. 

     

    You can see this coming a mile away, sometime in the future if we make it back to the playoffs, his brutal gameday management and conservativeness is going to bite us hard at the end of a game. 

     

     

    Let me know when the Bills have a big game

  9. 2 hours ago, OCinBuffalo said:

    Well, here we are again, at this time and place of the season, with practice squad heroes, street FAs, and backups of backups....

     

    ...STARTING...as our defensive backs == CBs, safeties, whatever. This allowed the Jets back into a game where they were physically beaten in the trenches, both sides, just like last game. So please, tell me again about how things are won upfront...when we win upfront, and still lose the game. :wacko:

     

    It's literally been 8+ years of the same exact thing. Again, we began the game with only one true starting NFL CB on the field, when we need 4. And, #1 guy decides to *%&* the bed. Which only reinforces the point: you can't expect a single CB to be the answer to all things passing in a season.

     

    I have defined this problem, albeit obsessively,(but can you blame me after a decade+ of being right, and no action/change?) since 2005. We still have people, be they posters here, or decision-makers in the FO, or idiot media, that can't seem to process this simple concept: "it's a passing league", and teams do not have 2 starting CBs, they have 4. 4! Even if one grudgingly agrees that a slot CB is a starter(= 3rd LB only on field 30-40% of snaps => is he a starter?), it seems near impossible for that person to understand that you need a 4th corner to cover today's TEs/4 WR sets/RB out of the backfield today. Again: 4 Starters.

     

    It makes no difference if you have 2 stud CBs. Today's QBs are simply going to find whoever is being covered by your #3-4 guys and throw it to them. And if anybody gets hurt? :wallbash: How many times must we repeat the lesson? This is rapidly approaching Orwellian denial of reason. Why is there such a blind spot on this?

     

    Answer: because at draft time, when we take a CB in the 4th round, or any round? Clowns abound screaming about how we could have taken a C/T/G. For literally 13 years the same nonsense: draft O line is the dullard's answer to everything, and yet: nothing. :rolleyes:

     

    You think I'm being overly hard on this point? Wait until the draft pick threads. When we take an any-round CB: same old crap from the same old posters.

    Blah, blah, blah.  Enjoy the tank

×
×
  • Create New...