Jump to content

DreReed83

Community Member
  • Posts

    1,317
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by DreReed83

  1. That proves the point that best is better? Yeah.... Makes sense. If Best was in buffalo, he'd be sitting on the bench too. Fred is better than both guys. Best would be better off on the bench behind Freddy, that way maybe a couple years of no contact will help his head heal. He's a midget back with concussion injuries.... And you'd rather have him. Thanks for proving my point. You're a troll.

     

     

    Actually, they handed it to lynch so they could trade him.

     

    Yea yea yea. If this, if that, if this, blah blah blah blah blah. This is all I'm hearing. If Best was drafted by the Bills, he would probably have done better than 400 yds from scimmage. So continue on with your "IF's" blah blah blah. The fact of the matter is Best was on the field while Spiller couldn't even get on the field. He gained over 1000 yds injured.

     

    That tells me what kinda player Best is. Spiller? He's not even a quarter of what Best is. And it shows on the field. Or in Spillers case on the bench. :nana:

     

    You dont think Spiller was givin a fair chance at the starting spot after being drafted in the top 10? Lay down the crack pipe.

  2. You do realize that we have a 1000 yard rusher on the team with Spiller right? And that Best is the main back?

     

    And the fact that a RB taken in the top 10 can't unseat an undrafted RB from Coe College makes it even more pathetic. Thanks for making another case for me. :thumbsup:

     

    A half healthy Best is better than a fully healthy Spiller. And that's pathetic. :nana:

  3. As far as Sanchez, you are nuts. Is he great, of course not. He was good enough to be in two AFC Championships in two years in the league, and the Jets didn't lose either because of him. And as far as their receivers, you (intentionally or unknowledgably) left out their best receiver, Santonio Holmes, just to try to prove your crazy point.

     

    He wouldn't have made it to the playoffs if it wasnt for his running game and defense. True fact.

     

    Career rating of 70, completing less than 60 percent, 29 TDs and 33 INTs? You think he would've brought them to the playoffs with a bad defense? And seeing A LOT of Jets games, those INT numbers should be A LOT more. There were A LOT Of dropped INTs.Trent Edwards completed a higher percent of passes his first 2 years...

     

    2 year comparison:

    Edwards: 23 starts, 643 attempts, 6.65 yds per attempt, 18 TDs, 18 INT, 78 rating, 4329 yds

    Sanchez: 31 starts, 871 attempts, 6.6 yds per attempt, 29 TDs, 33 INT, 70 rating, 5,735 yds

     

    His rookie year, they went to the championship with the number 3 defense and number 1 ranked rushing attack in the NFL. If you think they made it because of him, you're DEAD WRONG. Trent Edwards could've taken that team to the playoffs.

  4. Forget the luck bowl,bills will have the best d in the east.Not just because we drafted marcel,its all the other guys together-barnett,merriman,moats,williams,carrington,davis,troup,batten,morrison,wilson,byrd,florence,mcgee-not all super stars,but some solid vets mixed with young up and comers. Do any of the other teams in the east have better lbs?and the offence will be better as well ,i know we lost lee but he only had 37 rep -and i dont buy this song and dance that lee was only reason that johnson ever got open. your telling me teams are not going to cover parrish or nelson if they go deep, maybe they wont draw 2 defenders but if they leave a opening fitz will put it up.It will be a turn around year-the guys on tv dont even know are roster its a joke-its just lazy reporting .They just think its a safe bet to say the bills suck.THERE WRONG!

     

    Ladies and gentlemen. What we have here is a prime example of a Delirious Dreamer.

  5. one might argue the "overly" part of that means he goes over the line.

     

    Take away the Delhomme hit and what's he done that labels him as a dirty player? That Dalton hit wasn't dirty at all. He pounced on him, and then threw him down. The fact that he's so much stronger than everyone else makes it look worse than it is. So what should the NFL do? Tell him to stop lifting weights and get weaker? That hit against Stafford is another example of the BS. I was watching a replay of the Falcons/Steelers game last night on NFLN. Matt Ryan threw an incomplete pass to the Falcons FB and Woodley came up and shoved the FB from behind in EXACTLY the same way Suh shoved Stafford. Why wasn't Woodley penalized for it?

     

    Give me a break.

     

    Goodell is making a mockery of the game and IMO is by far the worst commissioner the NFL ever had.

     

    James Harrison, Ndamukong Suh, Albert Haynesworth, Ray Lewis, are bada**es. There ain't one player on our roster that comes even close.

  6. Suh is dirty in the sense that he is overly aggressive and has a ton of strength and talent. Basically he isn't dirty in the sense that Bill Romanowski was.

     

    I'd love to see the edge that Suh has on more of the bill's defensive players. I think Williams has one and merriman to some extent. Hopefully it becomes contagious and the entire D plays with attitude.

     

    THAT'S NOT DIRTY. Dirty is trying to intentionally hurt someone. By taking out someone's knee. Picking someone up and dropping on his head. Suh is just strong and aggressive. That's it. That doesn't make him a "DIRTY player." It just makes him an overly aggressive player with strength. He's not going after player's knee or trying to take out players intentionally.

     

    Like I said. That hit on Delhomme was on the dirty side but that's just ONE play. No that hit on Dalton wasn't dirty. He jumped on him and finished the play and Dalton's helmet flew off in the process. No biggie.

×
×
  • Create New...