BADOLBILZ
-
Posts
25,362 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by BADOLBILZ
-
-
If we are going to throw a curveball, I'd rather it be a QB. If Stafford doesn't go in the top 3 picks, there's a chance he could fall to us.
Your opinion may not be that well received here, but if you don't have a QB in this league you can't have sustained success. For a team like Buffalo that doesn't otherwise do a very good job of drafting, utilizing or keeping key personnel, having top notch QB play is ESSENTIAL and can cover up a lot of weaknesses elsewhere. Even if they don't draft a QB early, they should draft one later to develop behind the durably suspect Edwards.
Stafford is a great prospect, he has a cannon for an arm, accuracy, touch...for fans of the passing game he is a treat to watch throw the ball...the only question is does he have that special ability to make good, quick decisions at the NFL level.
-
Give me a break. This board is full of posers who believe that their season tickets or Sunday Ticket subscriptions entitle them to throw out all reason and common sense, rattle their swords by threatening to cancel everything, and heap disrespect on fans who dare to speak in support of this team.
Yeah, those aristocratic season ticket holders and sunday ticket subscribers with their HUNDREDS of dollars of disposable income! Who do they think they are threatening to withhold payment to Ralph Wilson? You are laughably pathetic. You do realize that those embarrassingly rich fans are the people who make it possible for you to watch the Buffalo Bills for free in your comfy chair, don't you? We get enough of curmudgeonese from Ralph, save it for your fellow broken souls.
-
It is just a game . people need to chill . I heard an add on the raido today for people to work in the sports industry , perhaps the people that are so pissed off should get into the sport so they have a say .
I am not happy that we keep dick , but as I have said I would rather keep him than get some other cheep coach and start all over one more time . In this time of economic problems you can not afford to go to the game or get season tickets that is one thing , but to say you are done with the Bills because you are not happy the way the team is going , is sh-- .
I am a fan of the Buffalo Bills and I will still fallow them even if they went 16 and 0 .for 5 seasons .
You can all say what you want about the team I have no problem with that . Just don't come back hear next year and tell us how you have been such a big fan when they make the playoffs next year .
Seems like some of you may be the same people that never left the Huston game .
Do you have season tickets?
-
Honestly, it seemed as in a few games this year, DJ was coaching "to lose". I'm not suggesting that was his goal, but the actions make it seem like, if it was a plan, the plan was "to lose".
In both NE games he coached to minimize the magnitude of the defeat. As bad as 13-0 and shutout at home for the first time in forever is.....it was much less shocking than giving up TD's on the first 8 posessions like last years NE game in Buffalo!
-
Does anyone actually think that the deep slant that was called in the Cowboys/49ers NFC Championship game was a good call? Sure, it worked, but I think giving the ball to Emmitt Smith would have been a higher percentage play- the thing is, Jimmy Johnson had the players to bail him out on that one.....
Good coaches prepare their team- great ones are the ones with the great players
Adam, you're welcome to join us in the 21st century. We are well aware that there was a time when there were great talent imbalances in the NFL, but that was long ago. Now, the talent is fairly well distributed and coaching is A LOT more important. You want an OPTIMISTIC glimpse into the future of this organization? Try the 2008 San Diego Chargers. 8-8 despite having the top rated QB in the AFC and one of the top rosters in the NFL. Dick Jauron would be hard pressed to win in any era, but nowadays he flat out sucks.
-
Well, I'll watch dispassionately (as much as possible) next year to see if anything positive happens. BTW Belicheck went from worst coach in the world to genius when he got to NE.
For the last time, Belichick was a genius coordinator with 2 Super Bowl rings, including devising the gameplan that stunned the Bills in SB XXV, prior to getting the Browns job. Free agency was new in the NFL, so turning teams around was still much harder than it is today.
Jauron was at best an average assistant coach, has now had 7 losing seasons in 8+ attempts and has had the benefit of 3 crops of free agents. The comparisons need to end, the guy would lose a coin flip to Belichick 9 out of 10 times.
-
o.k.- lets make April the head coach and fire the rest of them. go bills.
If they want to change coordinators, they might as well get rid of the head coach too. No self respecting prospect or proven coordinator would take a job with a lame duck head coach. I know people fear cleaning house on the staff, but it's past the point of tinkering for Jauron at this point.
-
Well, I would argue (for argument's sake) that unless your seats are high up, you probably don't have that great of a view of the field!
But since you obvioulsy attend more games than me, and I made a big deal after attending the SF game about how much more you can observe (or choose to observe) by being there, then I'll trust you've formulated YOUR opinion for the sake of knowledge, and not for argument.
I don't know if it makes sense re-hashing the 2006 draft. I do know that a safety, unlike a DT like Ngata is - at the very least - more of a long term investment (smaller, less involved players tend to have longer careers). So to take a guy that DOES produce well enough on the field that his unrelenting commitments OFF the field make him an extremely valuable player for years to come, with the first pick of a new regime, sort of makes sense, I guess. In terms of value to the scheme, I think I would have rather had Ngata. But, as McCargo has proven, DLineman are generally hit or miss. Remember how great THIS GUY was supposed to be?
You can always play the 'looking back at the draft and who came later we should have picked...' game, so there's no sense in arguing now, almost 2009 what we should have done in 2006. Safety was one of the highest positions of need, and they got themselves a leader. I honestly don't think that the front end pass rush of the other teams mentioned have been anywhere as remotely bad as ours has been, over THE LAST THREE YEARS. So, I'm really adamant about reserving judgment about ANY of our DB's until we can finally get a strong interior AND exterior of our DLine.
Like it or not, the scheme CANNOT function without a dominating DLine, and the fact that the defense HASN'T been a problem last year or this year in spite of injuries everywhere BUT the DLine (Schobel excluded) means the DB's deserve at least some credit. Would you agree?
You're right, I do see a lot from my seats you don't from your chair.
And you contradict yourself by trying to justify the selection of a SS over a DT, then emphatically stating the scheme cannot function without a dominating DLine. Was that not to be expected? Like I said, it was a bad pick on multiple levels. The position, the particular player, the needs of the organization....
BTW, I don't buy that stuff about safeties being more long term investments than DT's. Yeah, some safeties hang around for a long time, but so do a lot of big DT's. In general, lineman may be more involved, but hardly any of them absorb the kind of hits the small players do.
-
let's use all of our Free Agent money for a CB who is a bit above average....dumb....Pay what you need to HAYNESWORTH..end of story..
I don't particularly care for the "never gonna' happen" posts every time someone suggests the Bills make a bold move.........but the chances of getting Haynesworth are less than miniscule. Keep in mind, the offseason after this one will be an uncapped year, so don't be shocked if some teams plan around that and LITERALLY price the Bills out for any top free agent by structuring contracts to put unreal dollars into the uncapped year.
That in mind, Greer represents a bird in the hand from now until free agency opens and if CB was a big enough concern to use a #1 pick on last offseason, then not letting one of your best go in free agency should be a priority to prevent the re-opening of that wound.
-
I don't know what qualifies you to speak to Whitner's intangibles, but I do know this: He does, in fact, lack the statistics which indicate a "great" play. However, he plays in a defensive scheme which relies on quick, aggressive pressure at the snap of the ball, but seems to break down the longer a quarterback has to let the play develop. To be critical of ANY of our DB's is somewhat laughable considering how long they're expected to cover, given the complete lack of pass rush upfront.
Furthermore, if you ARE going to speak to a players' intangibles, KNOWING that Whitner is normally the one making the pre-snap reads/calls, one has to believe that in fact his intangibles ARE strong, since the defense has hardly lost us any games since he's been back there, despite the utter dysfunction of the DLine, the unit which is SUPPOSED to be the driving force of a Tampa-2 scheme.
In this instance, the intangibles I'm talking about are instincts and ball skills. I actually believe that those show up in stats, but that's a concession to those, like yourself, who believe they don't. I base that opinion off of a player I see from my seat at the 50 yard line routinely beaten because he's out of position. However, if you'd like, feel free to reference the list of low pedigree strong safeties referenced in the comparison. Those guys aren't playing behind great front 7's either.
Measurables are a given. He's small for a strong safety and it shows up routinely in being too small to handle big TE's. Picking him #8 overall was a mistake on multiple levels. Do you believe otherwise? Or are you just arguing for arguments' sake?
-
Good point, but I think they should re-sign Greer long term. They have a ton of cap room, and there won't be much to spend it on in free agency. It's a safe bet that Greer will be a better find for some other team than ANYBODY John Guy can guide to Buffalo.
-
I've said all along I'm all for bringing in Bill Cowher or someone of his caliber, but do you honestly think thats going to happen? Who and where is this mystery man you want to hire? Want someone new and unproven or someone experienced and proven average? We don't have allot to choose from and playing musical chairs with our HC has gotten us nowhere.
Not a lot to choose from? Compared to last year, when all fans just KNEW that John Harbaugh, Mike Smith and Tony Sparano were can't miss head coaches in waiting? This year is no different than any other. If other teams can find good coaches, than why can't the Bills? And if they can't, then why worry about keeping the LOSER they have? Anybody can lose.
-
Nduke in Cincinnati has 5 sacks, 4 picks, a forced fumble, and 10 passes defensed in 2 seasons.
Jones in Cleveland has 1 sack, 13 picks, 2 forced fumbles, and 29 passes defensed in 3 seasons.
Page in Kansas City has 1 sack, 10 INTs, 3 forced fumbles, and 25 passes defensed in 3 seasons.
Pollard in Kansas City has 1 sack, 3 INTs, 3 forced fumbles, 8 passes defensed and a safety in 2 seasons starting.
Whitner? In 3 seasons...1 sack, 2 picks, 2 forced fumbles, 7 PDs. The above players always have lousy pass rushes too.
Ouch. That frickin' hurts. His selection was an obvious disappointment waiting to happen, he doesn't have the combination of measurables and intangibles to merit such an early selection and huge contract. But I really thought he was going to have a breakout season in 2008. It hasn't happened. Injuries aren't an excuse, they are a knock against him and rightfully so. The Bob Sanders and Troy Polomalu comparisons are way out the window. He is good, but just not a special player and he plays a position that is so easy to fill. 3 years in, he's still gettting outplayed by Lawyer Milloy.
-
Sorry but that has to be one of the most uninformed lines I've ever read on TSW...And I've read a hell of a lot here over the Years...One winning Season in eight as a Head Coach and You think it's near impossible to do better??? Are you freaking kidding Me?
Have You been so dumbed down by losing Season after losing Season that your gauge is that far off? If so that's sad...Seems like with some Bills Fans the mediocrity has seeped into their brains permenently...Know this...The Bills can do MUCH better than Dead Dick Jauron who rutinely gets out-coached by average Head Coaches...Lets not even talk about the Belichicks of the NFL who make him look foolish...Something better is out there...The Bills just have to find the guy...But it wont be hard to top Jauron...Unless you think a 57-75 Record as a HC is impressive...
He has battered fan syndrome.
-
What, Its embarrassing that you have zero to back up your opinion that the AFC East is a weak division besides the Fish where 1-15 last year and we almost beat the Jets? my bro and cuz got a good laugh out of that one.
Pittsburgh, Baltimore, Tennessee and Indy have been the 4 best and most consistent teams in the AFC and none of them plays in the east. The east isn't "weak" but it's not strong either. It has 3 "good" teams, but the Bills are going to go 0-6 because Dick Jauron has never been able to beat good teams. Tell your cuz to put that in his autographed Dick Jauron pipe.
Jauron historically makes a living beating bad teams by not taking a lot of chances and minimizing turnovers. He can squeeze that out because it doesn't require anything special from his players, it just requires the other team to make errors of aggression. Of course, you don't get better playing that scared style of ball, but whatever. No bad teams in the east any more, so Jauron ball has been closed for business in the division this season.
Fortunately, the out of division schedule has been incredibly soft, because otherwise, the coaching was about 3-13 caliber in a normal year. None of the class of the league, no Titans, Steelers, Colts, Ravens, Giants, Pathers.
-
Exactly. I've seen weathervanes with stronger opinions.
PTR
Wow. Talk about the pot calling the kettle black. One minute you hate the organization for how bad they are, then the next minute you are damning anyone who points out how bad they are. Sullivan is far more consistent.
But the point is, who cares if Sullivan has a negative take? Why is it any problem to you guys at all?
Who gets upset about this stuff? People who want the Buffalo News to tell them everything is alright? I mean do you not watch the games? Not read the postgame quotes, the stats, the standings, etc..? The variables are mostly there in front of you, if you don't like it, draw your own conclusions and don't worry about what Sullivan or Mort or whoever says.
-
I'd be surprised if there is an offense from top to bottom as young as ours. We shouldn't be surprised when we don't always look too hot. What makes things worse though is that our veterans - like Losman and Fowler off the bench and Royal at TE just aren't very good players (and that's being kind). Other than Reed, who is surprisingly only 28, Langston Walker, and to a far lesser extent, Dockery, where are the competent veterans? Lee Evans is getting there.
QB - 25
RB - 22
LT - 26
LG - 28
C - 26
RG - 25
RT - 29
WR - 27
WR - 28
TE - 30
FB - 29
Turk - 1st year as play caller
Our depth at WR and TE is ridiculously young and inexperienced - average age about 23.
Generally, I think we need to bring in some at least middle of the road veteran depth to give some stability as these guys gain experience.
Pointless post. The Bills aren't "young". Offensively, they are mostly in their primes, defensively, they are long in the tooth on the DL and in their primes elsewhere. They stink primarily because their coaching stinks.
-
Doesn't hurt.
All right, I'll admit my confusion here: I'm not quite sure what this has to do with my response to Adam, which was meant solely to rebut his contention that the Miami o-line has been a years-long work in progress. In my view, Parcells/Ireland did three important things when they took over: hired a competent coach, got rid of the captains from last year's team (an effort to change the mindset in that locker room), and blew up the OL.
Oh, and lucked into getting Pennington. They're not 10-5 with any combination of McCown/Beck/Henne.
You have to love the excuses these guys come up with for why the Dolphins and Falcons turned it around so fast. Let's not forget the Ravens either. Continuity is only important if there is reason to expect future success. Not hope for...expect. That's not the case with a coach like Jauron who has had 1 winning season in 8 tries. Continuity is rendered meaningless by good coaching and players motivated to prove themselves to a new regime.
-
Anyone on the Bills like this?
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/writ...akes/index.html
I think the Bills have had plenty of those guys in recent years, but the big problem is not extreme examples like that. The problem is the large amount of players who can be motivated into caring, but aren't because their coaches don't create a competitive enough environment to bring out the best in them.
-
Open letter to the !@#$s running Sirius,
Thanks for not listening to all the subscribers clamoring for Boombox
39 to come back. It seems like you feel the little changes on Alt
Nation, such as mixing in Pendulum, will be enough.
Apparently you people don't understand music. Following Pendulum -
Propane Nightmares on Alt Nation this afternoon was Blink 182. Let me
repeat that, because you obviously don't understand the contrast.
Pendulum versus Blink 182.
Hell, let me link the two songs so you can compare:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YZBQMJlVXyc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U3O97n2gWJg...feature=related
Hear the difference? How in the world are these two songs on the same channel?
You people continue to prove you have no idea what you are doing with
the type of music that was on Boombox. You are trying to integrate it
into a channel where it makes absolutely no sense to.
Thanks to great radio stations like www.unitedbreaks.fm that aren't
filled with the redundant garbage that Sirius is, I'm getting ready to
drop my subscription. I'd stay around if Boombox was brought back,
but you guys don't give a damn about that type of music.
I've got to hand it to you, you guys managed to completely ruin Area
38 and Boombox all in one sweep, and now you are ruining other
channels trying to fix it. Quite an accomplishment, I must say.
I agree, I have XM and I miss channel 47 being ethel. The alt nation station combines other stations that I would rather listen to individually. I tried to be open to the changes, but they didn't just consolidate like services, they made changes that adversely affect the listening experience. They should know, their service is a total indulgence and they can't afford to lose listeners with all the struggles they are having trying to make sat radio profitable.
-
How do you know Cassell isn't injury prone? He's played one season in his career going back to college. For all you know, he has Tommy John surgery three weeks from now. By your standard, Jake Delhomme is injury prone, but his five seasons out of the seven which he plays are preferable to the seven out of seven that many non-injury prone QBs play.
No, by my standard, past history is an indicator of future results. That's how decisions need to be made. By your standard, Peyton Manning could have Tommy John surgery three weeks from now. He's still the better player than Edwards. I mean let's not foresake logic as an excuse to continue failing. And btw, the issue with Trent isn't that he might get hurt some year, it's that he gets hurt EVERY year.
-
I get what you are saying and your points are valid, but you didn't include the McGahee trade and subsequent drafting of The Beast in your previous post. That's interesting considering he was the biggest ass on the team when he was dealt and the Bills had to use a #12 overall for The Beast. The second rounder we would be trading for is the #33 overall, and I don't think of that as being quite as ridiculous as you do.
So, out of all those instances I gave you, you point out one that wasn't a complete backfire.....bravo. Still, it amounts to Peerless was traded so they could wait for McGahee so they could trade Travis for a handful of nothing then get rid of Willis so they could use their #1 pick on Lynch, who hasn't rushed for 100 yards in the first 10 games of either of his first two seasons. What next, you are going to tell me trading Travis Henry for the pick they used to trade up for McCargo was a good use of resources? Remember when the Bills felt they couldn't have two backs sharing duty? Maybe you're right, the Bills are on top of things.
-
I'm no Cassell hater, and think he looks pretty good. He's improved, actually. However, he has accuracy issues, and I am not impressed with his deep and medium-deep ball. He's blessed with good receivers, a good line, and a good system, however, which has made him look better than pretty good. The bottom line is that if you put Edwards on the Pats, he's gonna look like a superstar too. He's accurate, can efficiently digest a playbook, makes quick decisions, and sees the whole field. Whatever his flaws (and he has some), he'd be a stud in that system.
Like I said, if you put Edwards on the Pats he still gets injured and misses a bunch of games. I mean, is the OL responsible for the groin injury that sidelined him while the Bills dim playoff hopes turned to dust? We are talking about 6 years of injury history, not one season.
-
I don't want to make an argument between Edwards and Cassel because that's not really the argument. The argument is whether or not Cassel is that much of an upgrade over Edwards that you tie so much money into the QB position when you have greater needs. I think the answer clearly is no...I'd have to see more from Cassel before I signed that guy to a big deal. I think it's pretty obvious. It's not as black and white as your argument. He doesn't have the track record of a Drew Brees, who we absolutely should have pursued, but the numbers, salary wise, will probably be similar. To me, it's not worth it.
Well then, maybe the question to you is do you trust Trent Edwards to both play well and stay healthy? My guess is you do. 6 years of missing games to injury says he won't.
Bills can have tons of cap room for free agents with only a few moves
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
Fair shake? Every time Edwards gets ANY kind of shake he ends up on the injury report. I like Edwards talent, but you can't put all your eggs in the basket of a guy who has missed so many games, to so many injuries in so many seasons dating back 6 years now. It's troublesome and naturally the perception is that he is fragile, therefore soft, therefore needs to wear gloves in the cold, etc..
Some teams need a good backup in case their QB misses a game or two, the Bills really need a guy who can start 4-6 games.....which essentially calls for a true starting quality backup. Jeff Garcia?
What's more, I think people need to wise up to the changing NFL. Four years ago, the Bills traded Travis Henry for a pick they later threw in the garbage because they were working under the archaic notion that you can't have two top backs splitting carries. Now the league is owned by teams who share carries. I think that nowadays, if your QB is too fragile mentally to handle competition for his job, then he's not cut out for the job. Keep that QB position stocked as well as possible.