Jump to content

Billy in 4C

Community Member
  • Posts

    578
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Billy in 4C

  1. Love the idea of trading back. I simulated a draftwhere we trade with St. Louis for their #16 and #22. Our RD3 and our #8 pick does the trick. They get their RB that they want, Giovani Bernard RBF North Carolina.

     

    Our draft:

    1A-Keenan Allen WRF California

    1B-Tyler Wilson QB Arkansas

    2---Alex Okafor OLB34 Texas

    4--Chase Thomas OLB43 Stanford

    5--Darius Slay CB Mississippi State

    6--Stansly Maponga DE43 TCU

     

    Looks great but you're missing one key point - Buddy Nix is outspoken that he does not understand the trade value charts and prefers to sit where he is at and pick; unless at age 74 he has now decided he feels comfortable moving around in the draft. He did hint earlier this year he might move UP to get a QB but that was it. We will stay at #8 and pick a pass rusher (OLB or DE), CB or reach for a QB if they fall in love at the combine.

  2. I think Sanchez is a worse player and got the bigger deal so at first that made me lean towards that deal. But, Sanchez was a 1st round pick that took them deep into the playoffs multiple times.

     

    Fitz was a 7th round backup QB brought in to be a 2nd-3rd stringer for his 3rd team. The Bills bought high and will sell low on this one. Not only that but this commitment made the Bills pass on some quality QBs in both the 2012 draft and 2012 FA markets forcing us to reach for a guy in 2013, which we will.

  3. Seems like a lot of people are calling Freeman a stud...

     

    2009: 54.4%, 1,855 yds, 10 TD, 18 INT (6.4 ypa)

    2010: 61.4%, 3,451 yds, 25 TD, 6 INT (7.3 ypa)

    2011: 62.8%, 3,592 yds, 16 TD, 22 INT (6.5 ypa)

    2012: 54.8%, 4,065 yds, 27 TD, 17 INT (7.3 ypa)

     

    If anything he's inconsistent and prone to throwing interceptions. Sound familiar? Sure he's got upside, but he certainly is not a stud.

     

    Agree that people need to back off the stud. Where I disagree that in 2009 the Bucs were by far the worst team in the league - even the Bills smashed them which is saying a lot. The Raheem Morris years were a joke as well. This guy needs a good coach and system and he has the potential to do great things. Not saying we will make him into Jim Kelly - odds are we develop him into a UFL quarterback like all the others.

  4. He's a 1st round talent no doubt but the scenario looks like this: Give up first round pick which costs $2-3 million to sign the guy. Pay Revis $12 million. That's a $10 million swing. So you're almost talking about a 1st rounder plus $10m that could be spent on another player. That's basically a 1st rounder plus Mario for Revis. IMO that's not worth considering.

  5. Mayock compared Syracuse quarterback Ryan Nassib to Andy Dalton and Kirk Cousins because of Nassib's intelligence and love of the game. Nassib doesn't have a huge arm, but "can make all the throws." Why does that not get me excited?

     

    Hmmmmm. That was copy and pasted from NFL.com

     

    Has Mayock even watched him play for like one freakin series? Nassib is a body-builder who plays football and might be the strongest player on Cuse period. His arm strength is probably his #1 positive. In fact, the debate should be whether his strength is actually a negative. As a Cuse fan I've watched all his games and his #1 weakness is that he doesn't have touch on his short throws because he is simply too strong. He throws a 4 yard screen pass 100 mph.

  6. You guys are crazy. He was the #3 pick in the draft if he could have come out last year. I still believe he is going to end up as a first round pick despite the issues. Gamechangers get picked in the first round and that's what he is. He played in the SEC and flat out dominated the best competition on defense and special teams. If we are lucky enough to get him, he instantly starts for us and becomes one of our best players on defense.

  7. That's not true. Did you watch the game tape against Ohio State and see how bad the Oline was and how many drops the WR's had? You could've put an above average NFL QB in for Miami OH(who would dominate at the college level) and I still guarantee they would have lost. Yeah, Dysert had some bad plays towards the end of the game, but there is not a single college QB that could've lead that team to a victory.

     

    Back in 2003, Miami's D was not nearly as bad as this past season's one. The most PA for three games in 2003 was 37,31 and 30. Last year the most points against in three games were 56,52, and 49. Dysert has zero control on how well his defense plays, so why should that be a knock on him? No matter who is behind the center, when you run a spread offense with WR's that are terrible across the middle and can't catch for anything (I swear there was at least ten drops in the OSU game) along with a Defense that allows an average of 35 PA per game, you're not going to have a good record.

     

    Good points on the defense but overall I disagree. I went to a bunch of Miami Ohio games when Big Ben was on the team and he completely dominated. Dude was hitting receivers in stride 40 yards down the field and nobody could match up with his toughness. I haven't watched as much of Dysert but from what I have, it's not a close comparison. Big Ben was a top 5 pick that got pushed back in the draft because he was from a small school. This kid is a 3-4th rounder that is getting pushed up the boards because of Big Ben's success. Different story.

  8. That's exactly it.

     

    People don't get it. Chan's philosophy is to not risk the bad field position by missing on a long FG. It has nothing to do with Lindell; even if we had a pro-bowl kicker, it seems like he wouldn't okay long FG's. He obviously was okay doing so yesterday because we were up by 2 TD's, so the risk was dramatically less.

     

    I don't think you can criticize the guy for his philosophy; he has a defense that is giving up record yards, so he can't afford to give the opposing team great field position too.

     

    Actually I would think the opposite. When you are down against the Colts and need points, be more aggressive and hit the 50 yarder. When you are up big, play more conservative.

     

    Chan doesn't seem to get this. We've blown games we should've been more conservative and won (Titans 2012, Giants 2011 come to mind) by playing aggressive with deep INTs, and finished weak in games that were on the table.

×
×
  • Create New...