Poland

A+++++++++++++++ If these teams want to play football for a living let them build the stadiums. Nothing is more f**ed up than paying retards millions of dollars for playing a game and then relying on tax money to build stadiums. No football player is worth a million dollars a year or even a million in a career. If football players were worth that then the owners can afford to pay their own way.

Going by the theory made by the OP, the bengals should have won the superbowl. What happened?

There is only one thing I agree with here...I don't see althlete as role models. I for one never mention him or any other athlete as a role model. Any kid who looks up to these idiots as roles models is beyond help and a lock to be a loser. This idea that you need criminals to win games is idiotic. More idiotic is to care that much about it. My main reason for wanting lynch gone is that he is a retard. He 'talks' like a retard and he acts like a punk. His fans talk like retards and most of them are punks. Can't see myself routing for this punk and I don't like the idea of him getting off easy when it comes to running over a pedestrain and driving off. In fact I have far less of a problem with Vic than lynch. Holier than thou? No, I don't care if he goes to bars, I don't care if he smokes pot. Ideally I'd like to see this punk get hit by a car and end up not being able to play again. I'd like to see the driver leave him in the road and then get a $100 fine just to add salt to the wounds. That would be true karma for this punk, but kinda of a lot to ask for. Anyways maybe we'll lucky and some other punk will take a cheap shot at his knee during a game and end his career.

What you fail to understand is that I don't respect the retard like you do. I have no intention of making sure I spell his name correctly. His name isn't part of the english language and his name gets no respect from me. He is a hero of the stupid. If you respect his name that is your choice, but he is no hero of mine and I disrepect his name. Ok bozo?

I question why people wait with baited breath to see what he has to say.

You are supremely stupid. They didn't reduce charges for any other reason then his pleading guilty, it has nothing to do with him saying ....duh I didn't know it happened, I didn't know I hit her. BTW "Ignorance is no excuse under the law" is the exact equivalent of "Ignorance of the Law is no Excuse". And it is used in both forms. And if you understood that adage you wouldn't be insisting that they reduced charges because that moron Lynch claimed that he didn't know he hit a pedestrian. Also anyone who believes that this moron Lynch was sober and yet didn't know he hit a pedestran, can't tie his own shoe. You must have been the dumbest kid in the class.

Imbecile ? Hahaha you should learn to spell imbicile before you call an intellectual superior one. And as far as this moronic question of yours goes ..... YOU need to READ the article, as I said if you have problems comprehending we'll spoonfeed you dumbo. so here is your spoonfeeding... Do you also need that explained to you child? The DA did not immediately plea the charge down because Lynch initially refused to talk to the police, once he admitted guilt then the DA reduced the charges. If that is still too complex for your pea brain, then I cannot help because I am at a loss for how to dumb it down further.

The only point a moron like you has is on the top of his head.

Why, in your mind isn't it the opposite? Why do you choose to believe that the cops stepped out of line rather than believe that the idiot gave them probable cause? He is an idiot, we agree on that, so it stands to reason that it is more likely that the idiot gave them reasonable cause. You have no evidence that the cops lacked reasonable cause, just suspicions. Remember the first case he was involved in where people circulated all kinds of theories including the most popular one that lynch wasn't the driver, in fact some people said he couldn't have been. Then what happened in the end? He confessed and plead guilty. Wait until all the details come out.

lol when is jim kelly going to just disappear and while he's at it take lynch with him.

That Curtis Brown I remember.

Who cares?

Pea brain, don't you realize that DA's negotiate plea bargans? It was clearly stated that they had every intent of going to a grand jury because he was stonewalling, they began to assemble witnesses for testimony, his guilty plead brought the matter to a close dumbo. It was a plea down. How did I know you would have trouble with comprehension? A plea down does not constitute innocence fool.

Yeah sure that is why the judge said this: Bills running back Marshawn Lynch had his driver's license revoked in traffic court on Friday after saying he didn't know he hit someone while driving on a Buffalo street last month. Administrative Law Judge Thomas Gagola found Lynch's behavior on May 31 "constituted a reckless disregard of human life or property." He also imposed the maximum $100 fine and $50 surcharge after Lynch pleaded guilty to failure to exercise due care toward a pedestrian. The judge said that because the video supposedly showed how innocent lynch was? Maybe you think that the judge didn't get to see the supposed video?

Yeah you said it and you are wrong, just as you are with just about everything else regarding this. They did move to call witnesses in front of the grand jury dumbo. LINK:Read this and if you have trouble comprehending it let us know so we can try to help you. From the article: In the weeks immediately after the accident, investigators grew frustrated by a lack of cooperation from Lynch and the Bills. That eventually led Erie County District Attorney Frank Clark to subpoena three players and at least two Bills officials, including chief operating officer Russ Brandon, to appear before the grand jury. The grand jury was dismissed without hearing testimony once the agreement was reached.

Wow are you stupid, how can I get this through your thick skull? They don't base the charges on whether they believe someone knows they comitted a crime. Did you ever hear the adage that ignorance is no excuse under the law?

They need to load up on pass rushers, don't rely on one single draft choice to fill the need. Throw the kitchen sink at it. If they solve the pass rush it could easily take them from 7-9 to 10-6/11-5.

Where in this thread did I say I wanted him charged BECAUSE HE KNEW HE HIT HER? Not only are you are flunky for Lynch you are at least as braindead as he is, you peon. Anyone that believes there can be evidence that he didn't know he hit this woman is the village idiot. You're not only for moronic believing that there can be any such evidence but a retard for thinking that it's pivitol. And even more retarded for claiming that I said that this is why I wanted him charged. 1. anyone that believes that he didn't know he hit her is a retard. 2. it isn't irrelavant to me because I'm not foolish enough to even consider it as a factor in his arrest. You're aren't very sharp, that's obvious, but did that pea brain of your's ever wonder why lynch, if he wasn't drunk, or he didn't know he hit a pedestrain, refused to answer his door when the police came knocking or why he was on the phone with his lawyer?

"Anyone who takes any extreme view is wrong wrong wrong" ? LOL While at the same time you spew this nonsense... "one would have to be a fool (be it Lynch or some of the posters who dislike Lynch or his actions are seem to be fools not to realize that young blacks are treated differently in this society than young whites and that these judgments even if based on some real assessment of society as a whole is prejudicial when applied to an individual) to not have a strong sense that the probable cause in this case was Lynch sitting in a Benz being black." For all you know the officers where black. Get this through your head lynch is stupid, his IQ is south of 80, in all likelihood that retard did something open and observable that drew the attention of the police.

This is one of the better posts right here. Let me get this right...a columinist is filth because he calls marshawn a punk But when Marshawn runs a woman over with an suv and leaves her in the street and follows that up less than a year later by being arrested on a gun charge you say...."it's not like this is an uncommon event" This is should go into the STADIUM WALL HALL OF FAME. "Players get arressed all the time" but..... "They shouldn't stoop down to the "he's a punk thug" type of level", "the filth that infests Buffalo's media". name calling....reprehensible comitting crimes....no big deal it happens all the time AMAZING !

Oh really! Here is what you said, you clearly said there was evidence to the contrary..... So I'll go back to it. What EVIDENCE was there to dispute claims that he hit her? Where is it ? This other crap about there being no evidence that Lynch knew he hit her is absolutely ridiculous. How could anyone have evidence that Lynch didn't know he hit her? Do they have a mind reading machine? Or did he submit to a lie detector test? This is a totally ridiculous and totally irrelevant statement. Cases are not dismissed because the perpetrator claims he didn't know he committed the crime... Judge: Sir did you know that you robbed that bank? Perpetrator: No your honor if I did rob that bank I either wasn't in an aware state of mind, or I forgot by now that I robbed that bank Judge: Case dimissed See what I highlighted in red...tell us about that supposed evidence that he didn't hit her or didn't know that he did. The last point: Aren't you smart enough to realize that if someone is driving around hitting pedestrains and not even aware that he is running human beings down that this is a far worse case than someone who has an accident and IS aware of it?

Sabres, that's another topic right there. One minute they're on top and the next thing you know Quinn gets involved in it. I'm waiting to see what Regeir and that walking disaster Larry Quinn do at the deadline with Connolly, Spacek etc.

All these fans need to look at is terrell owens, he's one of the top players but he keeps ruining teams.

No one can rely on that information.

Right I see no reason to promote the Modrak. And I don't any good reason to put Russ Brandon in there, what's his background? I guess with Brandon it's not a must to have a football background, but beyond that the guy doesn't impress me as being very sharp on the occassions I've heard him at the podium. Supposedly what I am being told is that Modrak made all the right calls and was overridden. That could be, but I can't imagine how fans would be privvy to that, it's not like the team would announce it, and Modrak would cut his own throat if he himself tried to undermine anyone above him by talking about it to the press.