Jump to content

The_Dude

Community Member
  • Posts

    4,110
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by The_Dude

  1. 26 minutes ago, BeginnersMind said:

     

    The simplicity of all your arguments has a certain appeal. 

     

    [Something is ***** up, ergo] Muslims!

     

    The Deep State dominates the conclusion in this proof here so often that I find your  reasoning refreshing. Thank you and you should chat with LaDexter. He has a similar clean bit of reasoning. 

     

    Hes the jew hater. There is nothing outside of antiquity that validates jew hating. I love all peaceful peoples. Now, for those who don’t know, Jews were the Muslims of the ancient world. I can sort of lecture on that a bit. 

     

    As for my observations being simple, they are. Because history is simple. It’s all very simple so long as you understand people and their motivators. 

     

    The deep state nonsense is for folks with overactive imaginations. I used to work for the government. The government is incapable of pulling off conspiracies. 

  2. 5 minutes ago, Joe in Winslow said:

    Don't think this jew-hating is specific to these Muslim women:

     

    https://www.dailywire.com/news/44260/why-jews-came-america-vicious-anti-semitic-float-hank-berrien?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=benshapiro

     

    Imagine for a moment if these floats featured black people with watermelon and fried chicken.

     

    Just imagine how the fires of heretic burning would be glowing hot.

     

     

    And grape drank. Red colored fruit drank is also acceptable. 

  3. 15 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

    Dude, the really odd part of all of this is how a country with the highest standard of living in the history of mankind would even be having this conversation! This is what happens after years of indoctrination in the public school system. Why us would young people even be dabbling in this lunacy? Answer...there Union Teachers are feeding it to them for 13 years starting in kindergarten!

     

    My honest opinion is abundance brings decadence.  

     

    This is why im obsessed with Roman history. After the Romans kicked Hannibal’s ass at Zama to end the 2nd Punic War, the Republic slid quickly into decay. Rome became master of the Mediterranean which meant master of the world then. Greece fell quickly after to Roman rule and the Romans had so much that the citizen-soldier that won Rome its place, the austere farmer that fought the battles, they went by the wayside as Rome indulged.

     

    The same fate has befallen us since WWII. The difference between Rome and us is Roman plebs faces real strife and oppression. But like Rome, our values have decayed. It’s cool to not stand for the pledge now. The left calls all patriotism jingoism. We are no longer ‘ask not what your country can do for you.’ Now we’re ‘demand your country give you your neighbors stuff that you want.’

     

    But yes, there is no justification for this stupidity. 

     

    Churchill said it best (as he always did) when he stared Bolshevism is the equal sharing of misery. 

    Just now, 3rdnlng said:

    “I’m a capitalist,” O’Rourke told reporters in El Paso the day after Sanders announced his campaign. “I don’t see how we’re able to meet any of the fundamental challenges that we have as a country without, in part, harnessing the power of the market.”

     

    The fundamental challenges that Beto wants to solve are all socialist programs but he realizes they can't be solved with socialism, they need capitalism to do it. LMFAO.

     

    The USPS and UPS are perfect examples. 

     

    UPS - capitalism. 

     

    USPS - government ran. 

     

    I send important parcels via UPS because I want them to arrive. With the USPS you’ve got about an 80% chance of success. 

  4. I am sure that most of you like me are growing increasingly concerned with the lefts embrace of socialism. Nothing right now can be cooler to liberals, and Gen Z kids nation wide. Seriously, a failed economic experiment of the 20th century that has resulted in unmitigated catastrophe, and the deaths of millions is so hot right now.

     

    Here's the thing -- when you look back at Russia during the 19th century the conditions there were awful. Marxism made sense then. It offered an alternative to the slavery that most Russians experienced on a daily basis. Maybe "slavery" is a bit harsh, but there was no way before the Russian revolution a low born Russian had a shot at prosperity so it made perfect sense that they'd try something else. What they went with failed, but their desire for change was reasonable and understandable. 

     

    Now, lets look at American "democratic socialists." The only real oppression these people are fighting is hard work. Seriously. Are things in America perfect? No. But we are unarguably living in a great era. Even our poor people are fat. We have issues, but no other people at any other time have had it so good. That's not a statement to suggest we shouldn't improve, but it is to suggest that democratic socialists don't have a point.

     

    The democratic socialist will tell you we have to embrace their politics because in today's America the oppression is so bad that nobody who isn't born rich can succeed. They'll tell you that student debt is crippling them. They'll tell you that earning a living wage off of one job is impossible. 

     

    Here's my thing....they're all lazy pansies. Now this may come as a shock to some of you, but The_Dude is a blue collar guy. I'm a man. I build things with my hands as well as I break them. I'm in construction, and in construction we have thousands of vacant jobs that pay well. Not one of my employees made less than $40,000 last year. Not. One. That's the kinda salary these Bernie Bros think they're entitled to. So how come there are thousands of openings for welders, plumbers, handymen, electricians, HVAC techs, and so on? I literally am scared to fire an employee today because it can take months to make a new hire. Why? Ya know what you have to do to get a good job as a plumber? Well, you have to start out as a helper for about 6-12 months learning. And in our industry we pay helpers roughly $11-15 an hour. So what's the deal, Bernie Bros? The deal is that what "Democratic Socialist" really means is "lazy pansy." In my country, everybody with a work ethic can make it. I'm not saying America is perfect. I'm not saying we don't have issues like the cost of medication. But I am saying that these socialists are lazy defeatists who have the ability to make the kind of money they want, but they cant do it from the cash register of an air conditioned store. They might have to use a shovel. They may have to get their hands dirty. But the money is there. There is no just cause for this socialist crap that is going on. It's inexcusable. We need to start calling these people for what they are, and that is lazy pansies. 

    • Like (+1) 3
    • Thank you (+1) 1
  5. https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/will-smiths-rumored-new-role-causing-controversy-skin-color-113504252.html

     

    Who are these people? Will Smith can’t play a black dude because it’s disrespectful because while Will Smith is black his skin tone isn’t black enough? Like, who thinks this? How many people are dumb enough to think this? Are there really people out there like this or is this the Main Street media trying to convince us this is a thing when it isn’t. 

  6. https://www.dailywire.com/news/44230/ocasio-cortez-top-aide-could-be-facing-jail-time-ryan-saavedra

     

    I, personally will be imploring my congressman and senators to open an investigation into this for 2 reasons:

    1. The Venezuela accusation — the one in which Venezuela helped AOC win her election. 

    2. It looks like some shady things went on with her campaign finances. 

     

    If youre wondering ‘what Venezuela accusation’ it’s not you. It’s the accusation I am making up. Yes, I will just simply conjure the accusation up, but even so it will have more weight than the Trump-Russia accusation and look at what a behemoth of an investigation that nonsense berthed. 

     

    I hope that the pressure is put on AOC until she realizes the only thing better than socialism is suicide. 

    • Like (+1) 1
  7. https://www.dailywire.com/news/44228/rider-university-dean-resigns-after-university-kassy-dillon

     

    I. Hate. Liberals. 

     

    Liberals are tolerant rant of everything other than non-liberals. Truitt Cathy (the dude who started Chick-Fil-A) was a devout, southern Christian who was more Mayberry than Mayberry. Sorry he preferred traditional marriage. 

     

    Speaking of Mayberry, I grew up with thinking Mayberry was the place to live. How stupid of me. It lacks in diversity, there were no transgender women sharing bathrooms with little girls, and the show was sexist too!

  8. 29 minutes ago, GG said:

     

    No it is not. 

     

    China has had nukes for decades and it was a lesser concern than its growing military might right now, which includes a huge build up of its naval capability.

     

    For Pete's sake, learn some history for a change.  Don't just read the words in a book.  Try to understand what they mean.

     

    You're missing my point. 

     

    China's growing military is my concern. 

    My spat with Tom is over this being a unique threat. It's not like imperial Japan because nukes. The USSR would have been a better choice for Tom, but the USSR was very defensive in its military posture. I know this from several books in which I understood the words. So, it's my opinion that China is a unique threat. That can be debated. But it cannot be likened to Imperial Japan in my opinion. 

    Also, I have a fantastic degree in history. I graduated ***** laude while running a business. So, many professors seem to have thought I read and understand pretty gooder.

    17 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

     

    You're a past-master of misunderstanding goal posts.  By your measure - which is truly asinine, since no one is annexing the Western Pacific with nuclear weapons - China is LESS of a threat than Japan was, because the relative strengths of what were considered "strategic" weapons in each era is wildly imbalanced to US favor.  

     

    Your opinion rests on the idea that nuclear weapons are indistinguishably from magic, which is because you're an immature little child who understands nothing about warfare.

     

    Oh my god you're dumb. 

    Imperial Japan was able to launch balloons filled with incendiary devices to try and start fires on the West coast during the war. China can nuke it. China is therefor a bigger threat now, than Imperial Japan was. It's measurable, and you're a non-combatant, and a dumbass.  

  9. Just now, DC Tom said:

     

    Jesus Christ, you're a ***** fool.  You can't even equate the concept of "strategic power" across eras, and through some warped mental process equate imperialist foreign policy to "has nuclear weapons," all in a vainglorious attempt to justify "China is an unprecedented threat!" as not being a blisteringly stupid and ignorant position.

     

    You are one of the most phenomenal dunces I've ever come across.  You combine a remarkable ignorance of basic knowledge with a preternatural inability to form a rational chain of thought, with amazing functional illiteracy, with the most over-inflated sense of self-importance I have ever seen.  You are a supernatural maelstrom of stupidity and delusion.

     

    And you're ugly, and you mother dresses you funny.

     

    You're the master of moving goalposts, Tom. 

    1930 Japan is not the threat that China is today because technology. Your point was stupid, your defense of it is amazing. 



     

    18 minutes ago, GG said:

     

    Is your point that the main concern about China is their nuclear arsenal?  But not their 2 million + military personal, and advancements in all phases of military equipment and armaments?  Only nukes.  Got it.

     

    No, that's not my main concern. It is the main difference though between China's military today, and Japan's in 1930.

    I just had to point that out to our resident know-it-all who for some reason is constantly wrong. 

  10. 29 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

     

    @The_Dude The battleship fleet was the "nuclear arsenal" of the 20s and 30s.  It's how strategic power was measured.  It's why it was the focus of multiple arms treaties in the 20s and 30s.

     

    And I only see your bull#### when someone else quotes you.

     

    Nice attempt, Tammy. There was no nuclear arsenal before nuclear arsenals. Your point is idiotic. And there isn't a reason why there were so many naval treaties on the sizes of navies during that time. There were many reasons. 

    My bull####? Ho please. '40% of slave owners in the S. Carolina were black. I read it in a very rare census.' 'Ya know the jews did attack the Colosseum.' I mean you've cooked up some real knee-slappers. And you pretend to be better read, more learned, and more intelligent than others, especially me. 

    Don't worry, when I correctly state you're wrong from here on out, you wont have to know. Enjoy your safe space.

  11. 1 minute ago, 3rdnlng said:

    Seriously, you can make a post like this and still defend smoking pot? Who in the hell was talking about nuclear aresanalalaresanallls in the 1920's?

     

    Oh. My. God. 

     

    Do you think I thought....never mind. Maybe go back and give it another read.

  12. 8 hours ago, DC Tom said:

     

    In other words, they're like the Japanese in the 20s and 30s.

     

    You're a ***** idiot.

     

    I know history and thinking aren’t your game. Routinely you prove it. Like here. Tell me about Japans nuclear aresanal during the 1920’s and 1930’s. 

     

    For a guy who insists others are idiots you sure do ***** up a lot. 

     

    Tom, normally I don’t advise this, but if you’re ever peering out over a ledge and thinking ‘the world would be better off without me’ you’d be right. Take David Lee Roth’s advice and jump. 

×
×
  • Create New...