Jump to content

st pete gogolak

Community Member
  • Posts

    774
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by st pete gogolak

  1. 7 minutes ago, Thurman#1 said:

     

     

    So by dominant you mean statistically prolific in one year?

     

    Jerry Rice wouldn't be out of place on a list like that.  Rice's 1990 and 1993.

     

    The guy who's often left out of these discussions is one of the ones who most belongs. Don Hutson. 

     

    In 1936 he had 34 catches when the #2 was at 20. And 536 yards when the #2 was at 414, #3 at 358, the #4 at 325 and nobody else was above 268. Only four players got above HALF of is total that year, and that was Hutson's 2nd year in the league. Oh, and 8 TDs when the #2 was at 6 and the #3 only had 3 of them!!!!

     

    Or look at his 1939 work. 846 yards when the #2 only managed 550 and the #3 only 437.

     

    Or his 1941, [war years] when when he managed 738 yards while the 2nd best managed 362, less than half. 58 receptions when the next best managed 29, half. 10 TDs when the #2 managed 6 and the third-best only 4. Same kind of insane dominance for the next few years.

     

    One of the all-time most dominant seasons and maybe players as well.

     

    You stopped right before getting to the really good stuff.  In 1942, Hutson, in 11 games, had 74 receptions over 1200 yards and 17 TD's. Respectable numbers in 2021.  In 1942, they were ridiculous numbers, dwarfing everyone else in the league, DOUBLING every else's numbers.  

    • Like (+1) 2
  2. I know the rule is post - 1980 but I always go to Fred Swendson in these types of polls.  Fred was Walt Patulski's running mate at DE at Norte Dame and was our #3 round pick in 1972 draft.  We had first pick in each round and with less teams, first pick in third round back then was pick #53.  Today that would basically be mid second round pick.  Fred barely made it out of his first training camp and was cut before opening day.  To my knowledge, never played a down in the NFL.  Top that!

  3. Keeping Lamonica and trading Kemp certainly would have been controversial.  Kemp was coming off two AFL titles and three straight AFL East crowns. Belichick certainly trades Kemp and keeps Lamonica but it's a different age.  Plus the Wilson loan to the Raiders and Lamonica causing "locker room" issues, who knows exactly what was behind the trade.  Both Powell and Flores were done by the time they got to Buffalo.  In hindsight, it's the worst trade in Bills history.   

  4. 3 hours ago, JayBaller10 said:

    I definitely didn’t think Justin Jefferson would become what he is today and I’m sure Beane didn’t think so either. He wasn’t among their “top 3 targets” they’d have to move up to get. If the Bills had stayed at 22 and selected JJ, I wonder if he would’ve been just as successful as Diggs in Buffalo.

    The Bills didn't trade Jefferson for Diggs.  They traded, among other things, #22 for Diggs.  There was no guarantee Jefferson would be there at #22 if that was the guy you were targeting.  In fact, he shouldn't have been there.  Eagles picked Jalen Reagor - pretty sizable bust so far - at #21.

  5. Really, really hate the idea of trading next year's #1, not just for the Bills but anyone (thought Saints giving up next year's #1 to Eagles was just flat out stupid when there is a good chance it will be a top ten pick).  Of course it worked out ok for KC giving up a next year #! to get Mahones.  I've seen Gardner mocked anywhere from #4 to #12.  If he is there at #10, I'd consider trading #25 and next year's #1 for Gardner.  I certainly wouldn't hate it.  That would be top offer, however.  Wouldn't give up anything else.  

  6. If I recall correctly, the thought was that Josh would sit the first year, similar to Mahones.  It was pretty universal thinking that he was "raw" and would need time to develop.  Despite the numbers I think every single Bills fan was very excited about him after the first year and couldn't wait until opening day the next season.  That trend continues.  Can't wait for opening day 2022.

    • Like (+1) 1
  7. I keep going back to his first two years in TB.  Sixty total receptions averaging 16.6 yards per reception and 11 touchdowns.  I realize it's an achilles but even if he is 90% back, he can present a nightmare downfield matchup plus an end zone target.  It's a gamble but it's a great risk-reward gamble.  

  8. I really, really like this signing, although an achilles injury is one of those injuries that you may never come back 100%.  Takeo Spikes was an absolute great player but never really came back from his achilles injury.  I think Sam Cowart was the same.  If Howard can come back with 90% of potential he flashed before injury, I think we may have something special.  He averaged 16.6 yards per reception each of his first two years in the league.  That's insane for a TE.  

  9. Was flipping through the channels and caught replay of TB game.  Opening kickoff.  Bass pooches to right corner.  TB returner caught it at 8 or 9 yard line and returns to the 24.  Bass did this successfully all year.  I was shocked we couldn't execute this at end of KC game.  This exact kickoff puts KC in terrible dilemma.  KC returner can (1) let it bounce and hope it rolls into the end zone (ball on 25) or out of bounds (ball on 40).  If neither happens, game is probably over. (2) fair catch at the 8 or 9 yard line.  The extra 15 yards make FG that much more difficult.  Of course, you still need to play defense so maybe it goes into overtime in any event. (3) return the ball and break a long return.  Absent a long return, game over except for a long Hail Mary.  Again, who knows but I'd like our chances defending a Hail Mary.

  10. I don't know why so many people want to run Williams out of town.  He was terrific at RT in 2020 (anyone remember Jordan Mills' half decade at that position?), he was serviceable at RG in 2021 and better down the stretch when the whole OL performed better.  I think his value is that if Dawkins or Brown go down, he can step in at RT.  

     

    After the JAX game, I was thinking OL Rounds #1 and #2 of the draft.  With the way the line played after inserting Bates, I'd be happy with Dawkins (who really turned it up down the stretch), Bates, Morse, Williams and Brown as opening OL next year.  Brown had a really rough 4th quarter against Ingram but I believe he has the potential to be All Pro in two years.  

     

    Obviously, it depends on what we do in free agency but I see us taking a CB #1 unless we make a dramatic move in that direction in FA.  

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Agree 3
  11. 1 hour ago, No_Matter_What said:

    Where do you take this from? Sportrac has him at 12,9M. Let's say it's 40/3, with cap hit first year 10M. Count me in.

    We're not going to go after Scherff, not at $18 million, not at $10 million.  I think we'll add depth to the OL with mid-round draft picks.  Everyone complaining about "too many high draft picks being devoted to defense" is falling into sunk cost fallacy.  Where can we get most help immediately from FA and the draft?  I think it's going to be some variation on veteran outside pass rusher on relatively bargain basis (Melvin Ingram?) and help at cornerback and possibly linebacker.  Would it be nice to add a  #1 round WR or RB?  Sure but I just don't see it.  

  12. This is an example of the stupidity of having the free agency period before the draft.  I don't know how good Davis is but if we resign Phillips to a mulit-year deal at starter money and if we get minimal savings by cutting Star, are we really going to draft a DT in Round #1?  I doubt it.  Does anyone know the reason why the draft follows free agency?  Is it NFLPA (free agents make out better) or the owners?  I just don't get it.

  13. 10 minutes ago, Southern Bills Fan said:

    Because Flores said something doesn’t mean it will turn out to be true. 

    It's not whether the allegations are true or not.  It's the appearance of impropriety.  Believe me, this lawsuit will continue to get a lot of press and the NFL will try to bury it.  I'm not saying I'm in favor of a lottery and I'm not saying tanking works.   For God's sake, look at the Sabres.  They tanked for a 20% chance to pick Connor McDavid and they're still trying to work their way out of that ####show.  In order to successfully tank, you need a lot of things to go right.  You need to know your target(s), how likely you will be able to obtain your target, how your target will fit in to overall effort to rebuild team, etc.  Some tanks are incredibly successful (Penguins tanking for Mario Lemuiex probably the most famous).  Most are not.

  14. If McKenzie decides grass is greener elsewhere and we want to move on from Beasley, how about Braxton Berrios from the Jets?  Fills slot role, jet sweep role, kick returner role, plus weakens division opponent.  No idea what he would cost on the open market.  Would it make sense to approach a guy like this and say, "play one year on a below market deal with Josh and you'll hit the open market next year and make a fortune."

×
×
  • Create New...