Jump to content

Kevin

Community Member
  • Posts

    2,412
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Kevin

  1. Toronto for the Bills home games because
  2. Futility of the Bills? Or futility of you?
  3. mountains to turn blue on the Coors Light cans, which is simple really it's the ink that does it but you don't want to invest it because we all know Coors is NASTY
  4. Seconds to create a slightly chunky mixture for
  5. I haven't read the comics, and I'm kind of regretting it. Never have been a big comic book fan. However I would be VERY interested to find out what Terminus was in the comics (hint hint). You can PM me if you'd like. I'd really appreciate it.
  6. Ok. We get it. You don't like the Bills. The Browns message board is over there.
  7. I think Pitta falls into the category that nothing will be good enough. Losing Pettine was a bad deal for Buffalo, and possibly a worse deal for Pettine depending on how the issues with Cleveland fall. However, they didn't have much of a choice in the matter. Pettine took his guys with him. Pettine didn't run a traditional 3-4, so the argument about getting a 3-4 guy doesn't really add up. We have no nose tackle, Mario doesn't want to play OLB, and I'd hate to see him in coverage. The Bills did the 3-4 experiment a couple of years ago, and failed miserably. No, I don't want a 3-4 guy. Pettine wasn't a 3-4 guy, what made Pettines scheme special was the exotic blitz that he drew up. We have 4-3 personnel. Switching to a true 3-4 would require completely revamping the defense, again. I just don't see what the problem is.
  8. Then why do you post? If you don't want people to reply to your posts then don't post. You owe it to him to at least read his reply, whether you like it or not. As for your reply to me, did you forget that Pettine took all but one or two of his defensive staff with him? So, who are the Bills going to hire to run Pettines system when they are all in Cleveland now? The defensive backs coach? The Bills didn't really have a choice in this matter. They hired the best possible replacement they could IMO given the cluster ---- that Haslam ran for a coaching search.
  9. I don't know. That's why the word "possibly" is in there. I don't know what Schwartz knows and doesn't know. But to my limited understanding he's mainly a 4-3 guy and has been throughout his entire career. I wouldn't hire him to run a 3-4 scheme. I didn't think Pettine was a 3-4 guy. It looked to me like the Bills had four down linemen most of the time, and ran 2 or 3 linebackers.
  10. With all due respect this is the Bills message board, the Browns message board is over there. Can you at least wait until the END of next season to say that?
  11. Sure. I want a 4-3 coach to run a 3-4 he possibly knows absolutely nothing about. Why? Cause that'll give us fans something to B word about for another decade or so. Oh, wait. We'll find something else I'm sure.
  12. Fasten your seatbelts and hold on. It's going to be one hell of a ride until things get settled again. RIP Mr. Wilson. Thank you for the organization and giving us fans something to cheer for.
  13. Rips the hive to shreds while Millbank screams in pure
  14. They encountered the bus. Maggie, Bob and the other girl. Full of walkers.
  15. and supports for some of the men
  16. What are the odds that BuffaloBarbarian starts a "sign Sanchez" thread?
  17. Yeah, because the winners of free agency in March means CHAMPIONSHIP!
×
×
  • Create New...