Over 29 years of fanhood
-
Posts
26,342 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Over 29 years of fanhood
-
-
22 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:
So when we “elites” win it’s cuz we’re rigging the system but when you plebs do it’s cuz of hard work? Pathetic. Btw the fastest way to estimate wealth is to look at shoes. Anything less than Johnston and Murphy isn’t binary fide
You’re not one of the elites pal. I bet I’ve spoken with more politicians and kingmakers than you have, and in not elite.
Honestly you are just somebody without a family so you don’t care about the future.also Robert Kraft wears Jordan’s. And Charlie Ergan wears tevas and socks.
and Johnston and Murphy $100 old man shoes aren’t impressing anyone.
-
1
-
-
Just now, Pokebball said:
I think it's important to remove the top 1%, or even the top 10%, from a lot of these demographics. I've seen a lot of studies showing how much the top influences the overall result shown. It's quite significant.
The place where he cherry picked the stats probably stated so, just like one of the others had 80 data points matching what I’m arguing and one that is neutral. He plucked the neutral data ping and didn’t link.
Also one of the other data sets was copied from an unlinked quora post entitled why are republicans higher income than democrats 😂 he edited out the despite the fact that and the conclusion lol.
-
1
-
1
-
-
9 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:
These folks don’t look high income to me.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/gallery/2019/dec/11/donald-trump-supporters-what-they-wear-in-pictureswanna caricature of high income, watch a life insurance ad. Pretty close to real life
neither do these… what’s your point ??https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/02/us/politics/joe-biden-women-me-too.html
-
Just now, daz28 said:
Your pew study was 2014, and sample was 35k. The CBS exit poll sample was 3,520 people. LOL
Democrats hold 44.6% more wealth than Republicans.
The average household net worth is:
$237,639 in Democrat states
$164,254 in Republican states
In everyday American households, it seems that Democrats have a higher mean salary. It’s true that many of the wealthiest families in the country are contributing to Republican campaigns. On the contrary, families registered as Democrats have higher annual salaries than Republicans, statistically speaking.
Democratic districts have seen their median household income soar in a decade—from $54,000 in 2008 to $61,000 in 2018. By contrast, the income level in Republican districts began slightly higher in 2008, but then declined from $55,000 to $53,000.
Underlying these changes have been eye-popping shifts in economic performance. Democratic-voting districts have seen their GDP per seat grow by a third since 2008, from $35.7 billion to $48.5 billion a seat, whereas Republican districts saw their output slightly decline from $33.2 billion to $32.6 billion.
none of this refutes anything I have said. I know average income of elite democrats is higher, they are better at rigging the system and pushing tax burden to the working families and fooling you.-
1
-
1
-
-
24 minutes ago, daz28 said:
In 2012, earners over $102k were 31% democrat, 31% republican, and 38% independent. It's even, except you have to take into consideration that there's more democrats than republicans. 49% of all registered voters either identify as Democrats or lean to the party, while 44% identify as Republicans or lean to the GOP. Game set match.
How is that a game set match that over a decade ago the thing im saying is fact now and supporting with recent election data and a pew study may not have always been true.But since you’re doing 2012, here’s Obama Romney
https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/11/does-your-wage-predict-your-vote/264541/
And majority independent? What the hell can anyone conclude from that nonsense
keep trying . Even as flawed as your attempts are I admire the effort. Keep it up and you might get into one of these income brackets where you don’t want to donate more to the federal government and starting voting differently
also, did you deliberately omit the text of that 2012 npr study and the graph from the low income group or the other ten years of data in the graph…. No that’s probably why you didn’t link it 😂
-
Just now, daz28 said:
Look at the age groups, and tell me how that might relate to income. For the last time, far more democrats have college degrees, and they earn double. That 18-29 age group Biden dominated will be making good money eventually. The average salary in America is $49k. Biden dominated the largest demographic group $50-100k by 57% to 42%. Somewhere between S100-500k the democrats retake a large lead. Let's face it, your thread is a dud.
Dud ?? You are plugging your ears screaming not true then rambling about some irrelevant nonsense.Find on me study where the 100K+ income bracket lean D.
I mean maybe if Biden wins again and we get more hyperinflation such that 100k is the new 30k deadbeat group.
Take away deadbeat votes and Republicans win elections like 60/40.
-
5 minutes ago, daz28 said:
They're younger, and younger people make less:
A majority of Democratic voters (57%) were ages 50 and older in the 2022 midterms, while Seven-in-ten Republican voters were 50 and older in the most recent election
As already shown, college degrees make about double:
the Democratic Party’s voters in 2022 (51% held college degrees while 49% did not).
By contrast, a majority of Republican voters in 2022 had no college degree (63%); a smaller share had a college degree or more (37%).
LOLOL
The 2014 U.S. Religious Landscape Study is based on telephone interviews with more than 35,000 Americans from all 50 states. This is the second time the Pew Research Center has conducted a Religious Landscape Study. The first was conducted in 2007, also with a telephone survey of more than 35,000 Americans. The results from the new Landscape Study will be published in a series of reports.
blah blah blah.
Deadbeats vote more democrat and people earning 100k vote more Republican. You can hand wring, whine, obfuscate and try to rationalize a different reality all you want.
I can find studies and election polls all day long showing voter tendency by income and how it shifts as you climb the brackets into more successful people, at least until you reach the top half percent elites that influence the government.
-
10 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:
Show me your data. What was the margin of error in the pew study? Carry on with your bs. You aim to confuse not inform. Classic fascist tactic
Here’s another one.. you trust universities right?
-
1 minute ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:
Almost equal at greater than 100k. No data for over 250k which is a reasonable threshold for “wealth”
Ah yes the data shatters your myth, move the goalposts. The under 30k deadbeats is your party… you’ve got to be extremely lazy or barely working at all to not clear 30k.
and in the 100k split your saying 47% vs 44% isn’t a majority?
Now look at the Biden trump election. By in one bracket. Enjoy!
-
4 minutes ago, daz28 said:
He's getting pwned, and he's flailing badly.
-
5 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:
And you’ve yet to post a single data point buttressing your claims.
so who’s the fool?
Look it up. Votes by income. There are dozens of studies that confirm this.
under 30k overwhelmingly democrat
over 100k overwhelmingly republican
5 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:And you’ve yet to post a single data point buttressing your claims.
so who’s the fool?
You missed link in the initial post?
-
1
-
-
13 minutes ago, Wacka said:
Yeah like you posting here like crazy while supposedly vacationing in Portugal.
You are like taking a Greyhound to Buffalo and then snowplowing down the bunny hill at Kissing Bridge.
Anybody who needs to brag to a bills fan political sub forum about vacationing somewhere probably isn’t really doing that… 😂-
1
-
-
12 minutes ago, daz28 said:
Democrats represented 65% of taxpayers with a household income of $500,000 or more in 2020, according to IRS data, while 74% of taxpayers in Republican districts have household incomes of less than $100,000.
I’m laughing at the naive stupidity this post presents. you don’t see the intention of these very deliberate demarcation lines?
Now do under 30k and between 100-500k. this deliberate obfuscation and split exactly makes my point.
just because the extremely wealthy top 0.5 % elites tend to start to lean back towards democratic agenda because they’re part of the power agenda.
you people are so easily fooled.
-
1
-
-
9 minutes ago, daz28 said:
Democrats represented 65% of taxpayers with a household income of $500,000 or more in 2020, according to IRS data, while 74% of taxpayers in Republican districts have household incomes of less than $100,000.
Biden dominated under 30k, trump dominated over 100k. It’s very simple. Is this hard to comprehend?-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:
Where’s you citation re demographics?
whos obfuscating now?
I’m not. Find a single study that shows R vs D by income bracket.
it’s irrefutable. The better you do the more Likely you lean R. Until you get to the elites<1%.
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, daz28 said:
Education Level Median Income Mean Income
No high school diploma $32,000 $42,200
High school diploma only $53,000 $74,000
Some college $60,000 $86,400
College degree $117,800 $204,600
Must be a lot of republicans at those liberal colleges. LOL
Yeah it’s the liberal degrees that make money 😂 😂 😂-
1
-
-
10 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:
All that is ok with him because HE agrees with these policies. Others rights and freedoms or of no concern
Democrats are the ones that made me stay home for two years, try indoctrination of our kids into liberal extreme ideology, forced me and my kids to take an unproven vaccine, try to steal more of my money than they already steal and try to usurp my local governments power under their own control, have instituted law enforcement policy that has resulted in crime encroaching into our formally safe neighborhoods.
why does anyone stand for this?
the only answer is you don’t have anything to lose because you’ve already lost, or you don’t have any responsibility in life or a family to protect.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:
Once again, alternative facts
https://www.axios.com/2023/04/12/house-democrats-winning-wealthier-districts-middle-class-gop
yes you are presenting alternative facts as usual .
this graph doesn’t prove anything it’s obfuscation gif average to paint an alternative reality.
simply look us any data set you want of voting tendency by income.
the losers vote dem, the achievers vote republican.
-
1
-
-
24 minutes ago, KDIGGZ said:
They start that graph at 100k. DEI corporate hires make that much these days. Let's see what 250k+ looks like. I can honestly say in over 15 years of business I don't think I've ever met a Dem in those circles (besides politicians). When you actually work for something and devote your life to building it up you don't want to give half of it back to the government so they can hand it to Ukraine, house illegal immigrants, and pay off other people's college loans. Just sayin'
exactly, the majority of people who are smart and motivated to earn a recent living don’t want the government stealing from them.Or telling them how to live their life. Also people doing the most important work for society, raising children.
I rarely meet people who are successful family people that lean towards these socialist ideologues
-
3
-
1
-
1
-
-
Just a fact that needs sone visibility for all these bum liberals
-
16 minutes ago, Locomark said:
Please look up the 14 signs of fascism as explained in our national holocaust museum . It pretty much the GOP MAGA playbook .
Powerful and continuing nationalism
Disdain for human rights
Identification of enemies as a unifying cause
Supremacy of the military
Rampant sexism
Controlled mass media
Obsession with national security
Religion and government intertwined
Corporate power protected
Labor [sic] power suppressed
Disdain for intellectuals & the arts
Obsession with crime & punishment
Rampant cronyism & corruption
Fraudulent elections
there’s only one path to fascism in a democratic republic, and it’s through socialism. The majority of the items above are seen in the Democratic Party today COMBINED with an obsession with an all powerful central government. That was the Hitler Mussolini Stalin playbook. We’re kind of lucky fdr didn’t take the us down the same path. He tried.
-
1
-
1
-
-
Emotionally volatile on a play by play basis with a volatility range that expands with alcohol consumption and game importance.
-
1
-
-
This part of the game is ridiculous. There needs to be a quiet period until at least the superbowl.
-
1
-
3
-
2
-
-
Elam might be able to man up Kelce and keep him from catch the ball?
People who get off their ass and earn decent living lean republican
in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Posted
That’s as close a concession as I’ve ever seen from you. I’ll take it.