LeviF
-
Posts
9,728 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by LeviF
-
-
49 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:
Whatever you think of new gun control proposals, the process needs to begin with enforcing the firearms laws we already have on the books.
Suspect "previously arrested for having a gun." Given Supreme Court precedents, it's unlikely he would have been arrested unless he was subject to a special restriction like felon in possession of a firearm or illegal alien in possession. So yes, he should have been in jail, and a cop should be alive today.
I’ve been banging that drum for a while. New York City in particular has the resources to ruthlessly enforce every gun law on the books and they choose not to.
Every week I get a bulletin about people known to be prohibited from possessing firearms displaying firearms on various social media platforms. Then of course there are the endless videos on TikTok and what have you of gangbangers displaying their glocks with sears or full auto switches. But you never hear about them getting scooped up by the ATF to get their mandatory 10 plus 10 for the gang escalator. Wonder why.
-
1
-
-
https://abc7ny.com/far-rockaway-queens-shooting-nyc-crime/14570095/
Another victim of left wing domestic terrorism in everyone’s favorite shithole.
QuoteAccording to officials, the driver of the vehicle was arrested for gun possession in April of 2023. He was back out in the street.
If I or one of my brothers caught a gun charge last April we’d be sitting in a state prison right now.
-
Nooooo not those banned books!
-
6 hours ago, Tenhigh said:
Buddy, if you don't think you have an unhealthy relationship with Trump, I don't know what to tell you.
What is the point of this thread though, that people right of you commit crimes? Yes they do, and they should be punished accordingly.
The point of the thread is the same as the fourth estate showing every picture of a White person committing sexual abuse or homicide while hiding the faces of everyone else - to trick you into thinking that Whites commit a disproportionate amount of the crime in this country when the reality is the exact opposite.
-
1
-
-
The speaker abdicated the power of the purse, giving the White House basically whatever they wanted, then went on Twitter to whine about the border again, and your problem is with the chick who wants him out?
I get it. She’s loud. She’s low class. She’s a she and shes should not be able to hold office. But she’s right in this instance.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, daz28 said:
So exactly what rights are these "people", of "the political community" entitled to? Most of the same ones that citizens have? Who decides which rights? It isn't anywhere near as simple as you thought it was.
The People. Not “these people.”
The People was very well and clearly defined. You’re blurring it into other things because, like most shitlibs, you don’t believe that America is a nation. You think it’s a set of ideas or a piece of paper. It’s not. It’s a nation, founded by one people for The People and their Posterity.
-
2
-
1
-
-
4 hours ago, daz28 said:
Do you even research anything:
Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons.
Now ask yourself what did the 14th Amendment do: It gave slaves full citizenship.
Now ask yourself why the 14th amendment needed to grant these persons citizenship.
You fail to both distinguish between the Constitution’s usage of “people” and “persons” and understand why those words were chosen in each instance. For example the first paragraph of Article 1 Section 2 vs the paragraph you quoted above.
-
2 hours ago, daz28 said:
Slaves were 100% NOT citizens, yet they were counted as 3/5 "people" and counted in the census towards representation.
It literally doesn’t say that. -
1 hour ago, The Frankish Reich said:
Second, even if he doesn't mean it, it provides fodder for the belief that Israel is now trying to permanently eradicate or displace the Gaza population.
Has Israel not provided plenty of said fodder themselves?
-
2
-
-
5 hours ago, BillsFanNC said:
The concept of immigration judges and courts is a joke to begin with. ERO should be dumping these people into the Mexican desert without so much as a “how do you do.”
-
1
-
-
4 hours ago, Tommy Callahan said:
I wonder if this guy or his followers realize how many guns are in Americans homes.
The first one who gets shot trying to do this will get a statue, state funeral, and the entire weight of the state bearing down on his killer.
This is policy for Dems.
Btw this guy openly advocating for criminal behavior has 300k followers on TikTok and pro-White content is still banned on that platform.
-
7 hours ago, daz28 said:
I mean you and me might think that, but legal documents have legal definitions. "The people" is EXACTLY the language used in the 2nd Amendment, no matter how bad you wished it said citizens.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
But that’s what I’m saying. “The people” has never meant anything but “citizens of the United States” in the context of the Constitution.
You essentially believe that “the people” and “persons” means the same thing, though any fifth grader who has read any 18th century political literature can easily tell you otherwise.
-
1
-
-
On 3/18/2024 at 4:54 PM, daz28 said:
There is a misconception that the U.S. Constitution applies only to U.S. citizens. Some passages and phrases in our laws explicitly state only “citizens” are afforded certain rights, such as the right to vote. When the terms “resident” or “person” is used instead of citizen, the rights and privileges afforded are extended to protect citizens and non-citizens alike. Moreover, protections under the 14th Amendment ensure that no particular group is discriminated against unlawfully.
Do I like it? No, but either you follow the Constitution on everything or nothing.
This post gave me cancer.
“The people” does not include illegals. “Our posterity” does not include illegals.
As much of a disaster as the reconstruction amendments were/are, we can hardly blame the 14th for this one, since the language of the 2nd makes it very clear it is for citizens only, thereby rendering it not a “liberty” that a State has a duty to leave to every “person.”
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
5 minutes ago, BillStime said:
“Found liable” is different than a conviction on several fronts, including a lower standard than proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
So yes, “for my enemies, the law.” Got it, thanks.
-
Just now, BillStime said:
Should we start here?
Has he been convicted of rape or murder? Or is this another one of your, "for my enemies, the law" moments?
-
1 minute ago, BillStime said:
Oh, Levi, does this thread bother you? I mean, given your track record here - we all know where you stand.
I would also be glad to personally hang each of the convicted rapists and murderers in this country. That's where I stand.
-
1
-
-
13 minutes ago, T master said:
All the more reasons to bring back public hangings scum bags like this don't deserve to get 3 hots & a cot for the rest of their lives while the people & the family that he hurt has to pay for him to live with all the amenities for a easy life from here on out .
That's justice served isn't it ??
See this thread is hilarious because billstime itself would be clutching its pearls if any of these "people" (especially the blacks that conveniently have no photos in the posts) were publicly hanged for their crimes, meanwhile every single opponent of immigration I personally know would be glad to tie the noose.
-
1
-
-
Listening to this affirmative action r*tard accidentally back into the reason for the bill of rights to begin with is something else
-
-
American.
Yes. The answer to your question is yes. His mother absolutely had an affair with Fidel Castro.
I doubt he is the child of that affair though.
-
1
-
-
7 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:
Serious question: why does it need protection?
https://corporate.ford.com/operations/locations/global-plants.html
Oh for *****'s sake.
Lordstown, the FIRST GM US plant listed there, was abandoned by GM in 2019.
*It* doesn't need protection. Your love for $500 TVs over your countrymen is noted.
-
1
-
3
-
Soft on crime Democrats - the system is the problem?
in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Posted
It’s the same story every time, including from the residents here: leftists are willing to try anything except actually punishing criminals.
Example in another area is the Minnesota (?) AG suing Kia and Hyundai because their cars are “too easy for the youth to steal.”