Jump to content

LeviF

Community Member
  • Posts

    9,953
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by LeviF

  1. 2 hours ago, SectionC3 said:

    What about the calls to round up Democrats in the immediate aftermath of the murder?

     

    As it turns out, that instinct was exactly correct.

     

    The ***** that shot Kirk had assistance in planning from a ring of leftists, both online and in person.

     

    His boyfriend is currently snitching his way out of a gas chamber.

     

    Rounding up the shooter's boyfriend and their immediate circle of friends is exactly what ended up happening anyway.

    • Thank you (+1) 1
  2. Just now, thenorthremembers said:

     

    Amazing that people will run with theories that legitimately make no sense.  Like the Trump shooter being a Conservative Republican.    "Man I really love being a republican, I sure hope we win the election and restore those conservative values back to the country.  I think I'll make sure that happens by taking out our presidential candidate."

     

    "run with theories"

     

    lol no

     

    They're lying. They know they're lying. We know they're lying. They know that we know they're lying.

     

    But they do it anyway. Why? Because for sixty (plus) years Bolsheviks have had de facto control of the US Government and have reached the stage of propaganda that exists not to convince, but to humiliate. Only recently have they been getting any pushback, through the two Trump admins.

    • Agree 1
    • Haha (+1) 1
    • Thank you (+1) 1
  3. 11 minutes ago, Simon said:

     

    I should have made it in the preseason, since it was clearly about Aaron Glenn the person and not the Jets vs Steelers; at least to anybody who actually read it instead of just making a preconceived assumption about it. That being said, those reactions would have been exactly the same from the same people, regardless of when I made it.

    And I don't exactly feel dunked on; it seems more like a loud, sweaty dumb guy bounced in a lay-up at the wrong end of the floor while I was out in the hall at the water fountain. 🤷‍♂️


    Yeah the timing wasn’t ideal, since the first five or six replies were all about that day’s game. 
     

    I have a hard time believing this sort of stuff about older defensive HCs in general. Combine that with the constant puke factory that is the AFC New Jersey squad and I just don’t think anyone but a generational QB talent in the draft is going to “turn it around.”

  4. 1 hour ago, Simon said:

     

    Dramatic would have been "Aaron Glenn will be a great coach in only 1 week and take the Jets to the SuperBowl!!!"

     

    Suggesting that we need to watch out for him down the road and that he's going to become a problem over the next couple years isn't exactly overdramatizing it, imo.


    Making this thread after they kept it close with the perennially mediocre Steelers in week 1 is at least 75% as silly as everyone coming in one week later to dunk on you about it. 
     

    Like, I get what you’re saying, but you kind of asked for it. 

    • Like (+1) 2
    • Agree 1
  5. 8 minutes ago, Wolfgang said:

     

     

     

    As a former Democrat...

     

    I agree 100%...


    With respect to @ComradeKayAdams for being somewhat correct, it started way before Clinton. But they are unable to state when exactly it happened because it violates the leftist religion. 
     

    And it’s good to see that the resident leftists woke up and decided to be honest instead of lying like they did last night. Took all of 8 hours to go from “I didn’t mean that” to “yeah he deserved it.”

     

    Football guys, grill guys, “just leave me alone” guys: understand that Charlie Kirk was politically little different from you, most likely. They rejoice at his death. They want you dead too. 
     

    You will never be left alone. 

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Agree 1

  6.  

     

    2 minutes ago, nedboy7 said:

     

    One person shot him.  Who is they?  

    I assume you're implying its time to gather liberals and put them into the new detention camps?  


    As stated above, every leftist policy preference inevitably and explicitly leads to this outcome. And leftist speech equates every person to the right of Charlie Kirk and many to the left of him to people who should be shot on sight. 

    • Disagree 1
    • Thank you (+1) 1
  7. 14 minutes ago, SCBills said:

    Talking to a girl I hang out with sometimes who lives just south of Charlotte. 
     

    She votes for Democrats.  Hates Trump.  Yada yada. 
     

    Says she thinks it’s awful but doesn’t understand why it’s a political issue. 
     

    Therein lies the issue.  White women vote for this stuff but detach themselves from any responsibility for it. 

     

    That I still have to post the maps in the year of our Lord 2025 is ridiculous

     

    • Thank you (+1) 1
  8. 1 hour ago, JFKjr said:

    Soft on crime Libnut judges releasing criminals onto the streets.

     

    sU8gnhjhvsEv.jpeg

     

    "Soft on crime" is obviously not stating it strongly enough. Probably time to retire that old thread.

     

    Democrats are explicitly pro-crime. Specifically, they salivate over every slaying of a White person. In fact, if they were convinced this animal would not kill a white person at some point, they wouldn't have bothered letting him go free.

     

    White "conservatives" need to start seeing color. Because color certainly sees you:

     

    • Agree 1
    • Thank you (+1) 2
  9. 11 minutes ago, Roundybout said:

     


    Are we certain they were cartel members?


    If I wasn’t before, I am now simply because you’re expressing doubt:

     

    On 1/24/2025 at 2:42 PM, LeviF said:

     

    It's inevitable, leftists are literally wrong about everything. You could hold up two visually similar rocks, ask them to identify which one is hematite, and they will pick the wrong one. Repeat it with a thousand more leftists, wrong every time  

     

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Thank you (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...