letswinbills Posted November 2, 2008 Share Posted November 2, 2008 at least 15 or 20 teams were ready to snatch him up-not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NFLBighits Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 He KNOWS HOW TO CHALLANGE THE WRONG PLAYS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJ1 Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 Ralph doen't care anymore; he's not about to admit that his lifelong policy of signing head coaches whose main qualification is that they are desperate for a job, doesn't work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eliteqb Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 Ralph's probably kicking himself now. Unfortunately, we were all giddy after the fast start .................. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
murra Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 Ralph's probably kicking himself now. Unfortunately, we were all giddy after the fast start .................. Yeah. Ralph is really kicking himself. This is the worst decision he's ever made. Extending a 5-1 coach. What an idiot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
San-O Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 after 2 and 1/2 seasons, he can lead this team to a 19-21 record? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJ1 Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 Yeah. Ralph is really kicking himself. This is the worst decision he's ever made. Extending a 5-1 coach. What an idiot. How about a sniff of the playoffs first before you lockup a coach no one else wanted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VOR Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 Take a look at the other coaches hired in 2005. There were no great shakes that year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
murra Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 How about a sniff of the playoffs first before you lockup a coach no one else wanted. I think you're being unfair. I know wouldn't disagree with him getting "locked" up after the 5-1 start. In fact, quit your whining he's a fine coach, and we're in good shape, I shouldn't have to defend the coach to you because you can't handle back-to-back divisional loses. He's the best coach we've had since Levy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Since 1972 Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 I think you're being unfair. I know wouldn't disagree with him getting "locked" up after the 5-1 start. In fact, quit your whining he's a fine coach, and we're in good shape, I shouldn't have to defend the coach to you because you can't handle back-to-back divisional loses. He's the best coach we've had since Levy. And he still will be after back-to-back-to-back division losses. So there!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
murra Posted November 3, 2008 Share Posted November 3, 2008 And he still will be after back-to-back-to-back division losses. So there!! And you're a terrible fan who is so negative and pessimistically disgusting that they should probably stop watching the games if they think their team will lose. So there! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts