ieatcrayonz Posted October 14, 2008 Share Posted October 14, 2008 I think you're preaching to the choir. He isn't saying children should be left to fry or be run over, he is saying the lawsuit-happy nation we live in perpetuates a fear of helping others, no matter how innocent the intentions or the one needing help. let the tyke go and get flattened. saw the kid roasting, and instead of opening the door Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scribo Posted October 14, 2008 Share Posted October 14, 2008 Keep pounding that head until you cannot see the keyboard anymore... Things like this is why people who would in previous times stop a child from running out into traffic, let the tyke go and get flattened. And the fact is, if you touch a child in any way these days, even to save it - you touched a child and so your life is ruined. Maliciously quoting other people out of context is a serious matter, especially when you are portraying that person in a legally or socially unacceptable manner. Don't think your attempts to hide behind a screen-name would protect you much if you were to go too far, which you are pretty damn close to doing now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted October 14, 2008 Share Posted October 14, 2008 Maliciously quoting other people out of context is a serious matter, especially when you are portraying that person in a legally or socially unacceptable manner. Don't think your attempts to hide behind a screen-name would protect you much if you were to go too far, which you are pretty damn close to doing now. Please clarify. This post seems to imply a threat to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ieatcrayonz Posted October 14, 2008 Share Posted October 14, 2008 Please clarify. This post seems to imply a threat to me. I think he is saying that the guy in the thread that is complaing about too many law suits will sue me if I'm not careful. Are you gonna sue me? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scribo Posted October 14, 2008 Share Posted October 14, 2008 Please clarify. This post seems to imply a threat to me. What? No, my latest post here is meant to be a direct warning to crayonz, letting him know he cannot post b.s. like that and get away with it. He is saying you want everyone to let children die under trucks and in hot cars. That, of course, is not how I read your posts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scribo Posted October 14, 2008 Share Posted October 14, 2008 I think he is saying that the guy in the thread that is complaing about too many law suits will sue me if I'm not careful. Are you gonna sue me? Ironic, huh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ieatcrayonz Posted October 14, 2008 Share Posted October 14, 2008 What? No, my latest post here is meant to be a direct warning to crayonz, letting him know he cannot post b.s. like that and get away with it. He is saying you want everyone to let children die under trucks and in hot cars. That, of course, is not how I read your posts. I would accuse you a lack of reading comprehension skills but I fear your lawyer so I won't. Also consider this a "direct warning": I never said a word about trucks so be careful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted October 14, 2008 Share Posted October 14, 2008 What? No, my latest post here is meant to be a direct warning to crayonz, letting him know he cannot post b.s. like that and get away with it. He is saying you want everyone to let children die under trucks and in hot cars. That, of course, is not how I read your posts. You saw fit to quote...cite, two of my sentences, without clear reference to a previous poster's words. And proceeded to make comment. If your target was crayonz, you failed. That was sloppy, scribo...no reference to the antecedent. I expect better writing form. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ieatcrayonz Posted October 14, 2008 Share Posted October 14, 2008 You saw fit to quote...cite, two of my sentences, without clear reference to a previous poster's words. And proceeded to make comment. If your target was crayonz, you failed. That was sloppy, scribo...no reference to the antecedent. I expect better writing form. Are you going to sue us together or separately? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillZerk Posted October 14, 2008 Share Posted October 14, 2008 A shove in a crowd is not a basis for assault. If it was, there would be thousands and thousands of charges at any event where there is a crowd. And the fact is, if you touch a child in any way these days, even to save it - you touched a child and so your life is ruined. This summer in Cincinnati, a kid got into a car parked on the street. The owner went to his car, saw the kid roasting, and instead of opening the door and removing the child, he called the police. He knew well, had he opened the car door and removed that child, he was setting himself up for molestation charges. That seems like an extreme view. If a kid is trapped in a car, open the car door. You don't even have to touch the kid. Now if he was a pedophile with a criminal record and opened the door and removed the kids clothes to help him 'cool off', well than he deserves to be charged with molestation but that is a totally different scenario. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
czech54 Posted October 14, 2008 Share Posted October 14, 2008 It's a criminal charge, not a civil charge college boy. The difference is that the State is charging him, not her. She is not asking for money like the chick that Kobe raped. The criminal trial usually precedes the civil trial. Same thing with the Kobe case. Then the girl changes her story in the criminal case, and he pays her a little money. That's how it went in the Kobe trial too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted October 14, 2008 Share Posted October 14, 2008 Are you going to sue us together or separately? Lee is not liking your self-centered goading of others, crayonz. Please behave. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted October 14, 2008 Share Posted October 14, 2008 No, my latest post here is meant to be a direct warning to crayonz, letting him know he cannot post b.s. like that and get away with it. So now you can't post b.s. on a message board? All you guys that had Gonzolez coming to the Bills are in biiiig trouble. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chilly Posted October 14, 2008 Share Posted October 14, 2008 :angry: @ scribo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ieatcrayonz Posted October 14, 2008 Share Posted October 14, 2008 :angry: @ scribo With or @? If it is really @ then watch out for the direct warnings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted October 14, 2008 Share Posted October 14, 2008 That seems like an extreme view. If a kid is trapped in a car, open the car door. You don't even have to touch the kid. Now if he was a pedophile with a criminal record and opened the door and removed the kids clothes to help him 'cool off', well than he deserves to be charged with molestation but that is a totally different scenario. Your knowledge of these socialist-driven laws is lacking. Open the door and you are accused of setting up the entrapment. Only the authorities..police....social services...can do something. The rule now is guilty until you can - at expense - prove yourself innocent. Why do you think school systems expel kids for taking an aspirin or pointing a finger? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kota Posted October 14, 2008 Share Posted October 14, 2008 If i was Larry Johnson i would file charges against her for grabbing him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hossage Posted October 15, 2008 Share Posted October 15, 2008 I agree that we are overly litigious. I had the ridiculous experience of being kicked out of school for having aspirin when I was 12. The school board actually hired an expensive and flamboyant prosecutor to present the case against me to themselves. He shouted in my face and pointed until they somehow found me guilty of possession of narcotics. They sent me to weekend parole/community service for two months and expelled me from school for three months. My two best friends dads voted against me. There have been numerous other noteworthy cases where a large crowd of bystanders watches a brutal murder and does nothing. Samaritans who have revived victims with CPR have been sued for breaking ribs. My other experiences as a juror suggest to me very strongly the legal system should be avoided at almost all costs. On a side note, did she touch him first? In which case (sarcasm) they should both be tried for assault. I played against Larry Johnson in high school. He wasnt any good and we thought the only reason he started was because his dad was the coach. He sure has improved since. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts