JOHNNYFAIRPLAY Posted October 14, 2004 Share Posted October 14, 2004 YEAH DUDE? Would he be 5'4, 425 pounds of pure lightning speed? 70164[/snapback] NO, ACTUALL HIS NAME WOULD BE TAWNEE STONE! laaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaate hahahaahahah Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gantrules Posted October 14, 2004 Author Share Posted October 14, 2004 This is from GTA:San Andreas ---------- What Rockstar actually means is that the land area (the area you can navigate, boats being an exception) will be about 4 times bigger than Vice City. So what this would entail is three cities, each about 3/4 the size of Vice City, and the rest for countryside and those small towns. Remember, we are talking about LAND AREA, not including water or fancy tidbits. It's not really all that it's been bloated to. --------------------- www.gtasanandreas.net Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CajunBillsBacker Posted October 14, 2004 Share Posted October 14, 2004 Man, you don't know how much i'm anticipating this game. I have it reserved already and waiting for the all important phone call. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cåblelady Posted October 14, 2004 Share Posted October 14, 2004 Less than two weeks to go..... man, are you guys as excited as I am! 69716[/snapback] My son has been doing a countdown for about a month now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Campy Posted October 14, 2004 Share Posted October 14, 2004 No doubt it looks better. But saying it plays better is just wrong. Except for LOAD times, there is no difference. I own both systems. Believe me, it wont be worth the wait. The only people that say it IS worth the wait are those that only own an XBox. By the time is comes out for XBox, the XBox 2's will be ready to ship, and no one wil want it anyway. While you guys wait, I'll be having fun playing it. That's the bottom line. 70148[/snapback] Rockstar has an exclusive with Sony, that's the reason for the delay in it being released to xbox, similar to Splinter Cell for one, which was out on xbox long before it made it's way to other consoles. It's simply part of the business, and no single console will always get all of the games first. Tightened collision detection -like bullets hitting you THROUGH A WALL were part of the PS2 version. For giggles, I used the exact same wall (ramp near the mall) for cover, and I didn't get hit once by a bullet through the wall. That, to me anyway, makes it a better version to play. Just my opinon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Campy Posted October 14, 2004 Share Posted October 14, 2004 So to simplify my argument XBox = First person shooters / Sports games / Online if you can afford it PS2 = RPG's / Wider Variety / Free Online Capablitites It all just comes down to what you prefer. Sorry if this was too in-depth.... but it is my job after all. 70157[/snapback] No big argumument from me, but Morrowind, Star Wars KOTR, and Fable are all dynamite RPGs, and they're available ONLY on the xbox. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts