Jump to content

This Was Quite The Confusing Game


Bill from NYC

Recommended Posts

9) We gave up a ton of passes, yet I came away thinking that Nate had a good game.

842471[/snapback]

 

Last year, I thought that McGee was replacing Clements as our best CB. This year, obviously, that sounds silly - Clements has been good, at times very good, and McGee has bordered on being benched.

 

After yesterday, Clements convinced me that we aught to pay him this offseason. If you are wondering how it is that we only gave up 14 offensive points to a team who's QB tied an NFL record for completions and whose RB's averaged 7 yards per carry, the answer is in large part Nate Clements - he had an INT, a fumble recovery, and the game-saving stop on 3rd and 2. He saved the Green Bay game too. And although Andre Johnson had his plays (a player of his caliber usually does), Clements is also the primary reason why Johnson didn't go all Chris Chambers (remember last year) on us.

 

I think that we have to pay him....

 

JDG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...