KD in CA Posted September 17, 2006 Share Posted September 17, 2006 Wow...Reed didn't even need to touch him for the play to work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dibs Posted September 17, 2006 Share Posted September 17, 2006 Is that a BS call or legit??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkman Posted September 17, 2006 Share Posted September 17, 2006 Is that a BS call or legit??? 776043[/snapback] Looks / Sounds legit to me.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted September 17, 2006 Share Posted September 17, 2006 Wow...Reed didn't even need to touch him for the play to work. 776042[/snapback] He did need to block the guy...after the ball was caught. Not before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YOOOOOO Posted September 17, 2006 Share Posted September 17, 2006 its legit....... tough call for Reed though....that is exactly what he is suppose to do Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dibs Posted September 17, 2006 Share Posted September 17, 2006 Looks / Sounds legit to me.. 776044[/snapback] Fair enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lori Posted September 17, 2006 Share Posted September 17, 2006 Close. Probably would've called him for holding if not PI, though. Incomplete. Lindell on for the FG. 16-0. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted September 17, 2006 Share Posted September 17, 2006 Is that a BS call or legit??? 776043[/snapback] Legit. Nit-picky, the Patriots would have got away with it, but it was a legit call. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkman Posted September 17, 2006 Share Posted September 17, 2006 Fair enough. 776047[/snapback] Okay..16 to 0.. rather have seen 20 to 0 though.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frez Posted September 17, 2006 Share Posted September 17, 2006 Lindell looks like a real NFL kicker this year. WTF is up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted September 17, 2006 Share Posted September 17, 2006 its legit.......tough call for Reed though....that is exactly what he is suppose to do 776046[/snapback] Almost exactly. He was about a half-second too early doing it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MichFan Posted September 17, 2006 Share Posted September 17, 2006 Radio said it looked like a backward lateral, not a forward pass -- thus should have been no pass interference. Those watching on TV, is that right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lori Posted September 17, 2006 Share Posted September 17, 2006 Crap. Gotta go to work. Cheer 'em on to victory for me, guys! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted September 17, 2006 Share Posted September 17, 2006 Okay..16 to 0.. rather have seen 20 to 0 though.. 776050[/snapback] Two TD's down though. NOW if Jauron wants to go for it on 4th and 1 in FG range, I'm for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Florida_BillsFan Posted September 17, 2006 Share Posted September 17, 2006 Ryan Lindell is the man! ESAD Mike Malarkey !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YOOOOOO Posted September 17, 2006 Share Posted September 17, 2006 Radio said it looked like a backward lateral, not a forward pass -- thus should have been no pass interference. Those watching on TV, is that right? 776053[/snapback] nah it was forward by bout a year and half...... but we all know one crew didnt think a yard and half forward was a foirward pass(music city bull sh--) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkman Posted September 17, 2006 Share Posted September 17, 2006 Okay.. They put a nail in.. but hit it wrong and bent the nail.. damn.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted September 17, 2006 Share Posted September 17, 2006 Radio said it looked like a backward lateral, not a forward pass -- thus should have been no pass interference. Those watching on TV, is that right? 776053[/snapback] Could be. I'd have to rewind and check...I'll do it later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frez Posted September 17, 2006 Share Posted September 17, 2006 I smell another turnover...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted September 17, 2006 Share Posted September 17, 2006 Radio said it looked like a backward lateral, not a forward pass -- thus should have been no pass interference. Those watching on TV, is that right? 776053[/snapback] No, not even close. Parish came back to the line of scrimmage before the catch, but it was still a forward pass by about 6 yards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts