Jump to content

Bush's Address to UN


LasBillz

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Oh, also- I didn't hear Annan's speech, I was commenting in George's.  But I'm sure not taking your word for it.

44523[/snapback]

So you have no basis for comparison? You just saw what you thought you wanted to see, and THAT WAS GOOD ENOUGH FOR YOU?

 

How can you honestly be critically observant about something when you have no basis for comparison?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is people like you who are killing me in this election. You are exactly the reason why I am having a tough time getting my message out.

Wow.  Is this guy for real?

 

Here's some solid advice- why not write a book about your struggle?  You could easily get your message out- but you'd better check Amazon- I think "Mein Kampf" is taken.

44631[/snapback]

 

 

Yes, I am for real. I guess you are too stupid to see that.

 

Stick with "Bush Bad," "No Blood For Oil," "Halliburton," "Mission Accomplished," etc. It is much easier to just parrot than to actually think. If you actually thought your posts (just in this thread) through, you would realize you sound like an idiot:

 

"The UN hates Bush because they were quiet during his speech."

 

"No, that's just the way the UN listens to speeches."

 

"Maybe...but the UN hates Bush because they were quiet during his speech."

 

"But they were just as quiet during Annan's speech."

 

"I don't believe you, because they like Annan and they hate Bush because they were quiet during his speech."

 

"BUT THAT'S THE WAY THE UN LISTENS TO SPEECHES!!!"

 

But of course, you now need to say people advocate murder, they are Hitler, etc. You may want to watch the Hitler stuff, though. This board does not tolerate that kind of stuff. Moderators and Adminstrators have been known to delete posts like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you have no basis for comparison? You just saw what you thought you wanted to see, and THAT WAS GOOD ENOUGH FOR YOU?

 

How can you honestly be critically observant about something when you have no basis for comparison?

44640[/snapback]

 

I know better than to take the word of someone I'm arguing with, especially someone who personally insults me, like some of the characters (for lack of a better term, lest I be censored again for fighting back) on this board.

 

I was commenting on Bush's speech, not comparing it to Anan's. However, if you turn the page back, you'll see that before the war, the neocons guaranteed

we'd be greeted as liberators, with flowers and parades in Baghdad.

 

If that weren't a misbegotten lie, at least the British delegation would have broken out in applause.

 

And, once again- just because a neocon says it, doesn't mean it's true- do any of you now guarantee that in the history of the UN, a speech has NEVER been interrupted by applause? While we're comparing speeches, why not compare all the speeches made by world leaders in the history of the Assembly?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know better than to take the word of someone I'm arguing with, especially someone who personally insults me, like some of the characters (for lack of a better term, lest I be censored again for fighting back) on this board.

 

  I was commenting on Bush's speech, not comparing it to Anan's.  However, if you turn the page back, you'll see that before the war, the neocons guaranteed

we'd be greeted as liberators, with flowers and parades in Baghdad.

 

  If that weren't a misbegotten lie,  at least the British delegation would have broken out in applause. 

 

  And, once again- just because a neocon says it, doesn't mean it's true- do any of you now guarantee that in the history of the UN, a speech has NEVER been interrupted by applause?  While we're comparing speeches, why not compare all the speeches made by world leaders in the history of the Assembly?

44659[/snapback]

 

 

Nice way to avoid Paco's question. He specifically stated that you have no basis for comparision, since you only listened to Bush's speech.

 

Keep it up. You are just making yourself look worse and worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is because I was in Vietnam.

44663[/snapback]

Really? Do tell? Must have been exciting, what did you do? Do you have any video?

 

I am honored to be posting with a hero such as yourself. I bet you came back and told everyone about you and your fellow warriors heroics too? How you killed all those armed rough and ready communists, even while facing protests at home for those comunists agents who went there. Those same ones who sat on communists tanks, talked bad about you our troops, and rallied in Washington against all of you heroes there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really?  Do tell?  Must have been exciting, what did you do?  Do you have any video? 

 

I am honored to be posting with a hero such as yourself.  I bet you came back and told everyone about you and your fellow warriors heroics too?  How you killed all those armed rough and ready communists, even while facing protests at home for those comunists agents who went there.  Those same ones who sat on communists tanks, talked bad about you our troops, and rallied in Washington against all of you heroes there.

44682[/snapback]

 

I went for four months, got some medals, threw them away, came back and said that my fellow soldiers are war criminals, and now am trying to get them to vote for me for President.

 

Oh, yeah, and I was in Congress for a few years, but we won't talk about that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went for four months, got some medals, threw them away, came back and said that my fellow soldiers are war criminals, and now am trying to get them to vote for me for President.

 

Oh, yeah, and I was in Congress for a few years, but we won't talk about that.

44689[/snapback]

 

I thought you were heroes why did you call them criminals?

 

Why would you throw your medals away. Didn't you get them with Valor?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

    You failed to comment on  Bush's disregard for the thousands of innocent Iraqi lives he needlessly terminated, or in his words, "liberated".  You did comment on what you claimed was my double standard about speech applause. 

 

44506[/snapback]

 

 

Your post wasn't about "innocent Iraqis", it was about Bush's reception at the UN.

 

 

Go ahead and keep flailing away though.....it's fun to watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went for four months, got some medals, threw them away, came back and said that my fellow soldiers are war criminals, and now am trying to get them to vote for me for President.

 

Oh, yeah, and I was in Congress for a few years, but we won't talk about that.

44689[/snapback]

 

Is Hanoi Jane good in the sack?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice way to avoid Paco's question. He specifically stated that you have no basis for comparision, since you only listened to Bush's speech.

 

Keep it up. You are just making yourself look worse and worse.

44679[/snapback]

 

Once again, if I lost enough IQ points I might agree with you. Sadly for you, I haven't. Paco's question is comparing Bush's speech to Anan's, only because it makes his limited point. Pretty limited comparison, like taking a two person poll.

You guys say again and again, the UN NEVER applauds speeches, and you offer Anan's speech as proof. Without reviewing all the speeches in the history of the UN, what proof do you have? Do you actually believe your own nonsense?

 

So many closed minds...so little time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once again, if I lost enough IQ points I might agree with you.  Sadly for you, I haven't.  Paco's question is comparing Bush's speech to Anan's, only because it makes his limited point.  Pretty limited comparison, like taking a two person poll.

You guys say again and again, the UN NEVER applauds speeches, and you offer Anan's speech as proof.  Without reviewing all the speeches in the history of the UN, what proof do you have?  Do you actually believe your own nonsense?

 

  So many closed minds...so little time.

44710[/snapback]

 

 

No, it is more like Annan spoke DIRECTLY BEFORE BUSH, so it is a valid comparison since it is THE EXACT SAME AUDIENCE.

 

I know that critical analysis is not one of your strengths, but damn.

 

BTW, you can't afford to lose any more IQ points. You need to preserve the few that remain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, it is more like Annan spoke DIRECTLY BEFORE BUSH, so it is a valid comparison since it is THE EXACT SAME AUDIENCE.

 

I know that critical analysis is not one of your strengths, but damn.

 

BTW, you can't afford to lose any more IQ points. You need to preserve the few that remain.

44718[/snapback]

 

 

Apparently, LasBills did NOT stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...