Jump to content

The New Tuck Rule


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, GunnerBill said:

 

There wasn't but there didn't need to be given the call on the field. There needed to be compelling evidence to the contrary. 

 

Thanks.  I was watching with a group and couldn’t hear the commentary.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@shaw66 convinced me the rule makes sense with this comment:

 

Quote

So a receiver can be standing out of bounds and tip the ball to a teammate inbounds, and that's a catch?  That COULD be the rule, but it violates the basic idea that the game is played inside the lines, not outside.  

 

Otherwise you get into weird territory of "well where was the ball relative to where the out of bounds player was" stuff and so on and so on.  The NFL needs more objective calls and less subjective calls.  Everyone remembers the pushing receivers out of bounds days right?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...