MrJaimie Posted December 22, 2004 Share Posted December 22, 2004 thats the truth 174016[/snapback] According to him, that was Ralph's doing. He said he wanted Flutie to start. Of course, if he's the HC, shouldn't he be the one to make the decision? Funny that he didn't stand up for Flutie but did later on for his special teams coach... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arkady Renko Posted December 22, 2004 Share Posted December 22, 2004 So it wasn't Wades decision to pull Flutie after RJ won a meaning less game in Indy? Who's was it? 174045[/snapback] In retrospect that was a bad move, but I recall Flutie sucking ass all year. Very limited offensive production. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted December 22, 2004 Share Posted December 22, 2004 So it wasn't Wades decision to pull Flutie after RJ won a meaning less game in Indy? Who's was it? 174045[/snapback] Ralph's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arkady Renko Posted December 22, 2004 Share Posted December 22, 2004 Ralph's. 174058[/snapback] Wow, I hadn't heard that. I thought I recall Joe Pendry being involved somehow too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geo in Pa Posted December 22, 2004 Share Posted December 22, 2004 You should listen to the local media here in Pittsburgh - they HATE Mularkey - particularly the local radio hosts. Alot of it goes back to the game last year at the Jets in the snow - the Steelers continued to throw even though the footing was a joke. They don't seem to understand that you want to throw when it's a slick field - the receivers have a big advantage. - however in that game the receivers did not have an advantage because the conditions were so bad. Marlkey admitted he threw too much in that game but the Yinzers still hate him anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts