....lybob Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 I don't get to watch much college football live - so any opinions on how the 3-4 DEs rate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mob16151 Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 (edited) I don't get to watch much college football live - so any opinions on how the 3-4 DEs rate. Right now I have them 1.Dareus 2.Bowers 3.Clayborne 4.Fairley 5.Heyward Cue vehement disagreement. Edited December 1, 2010 by mob16151 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dgrid Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 Right now I have them 1.Dareus 2.Bowers 3.Clayborne 4.Fairley 5.Heyward Cue vehement disagreement. and those all top 10 picks right? Kinda nice those kind of players at top that fit our need Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Armchair GM Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 Right now I have them 1.Dareus 2.Bowers 3.Clayborne 4.Fairley 5.Heyward Cue vehement disagreement. Not vehement, but i'd reorder the list as such: 1.Bowers 2.Heyward 3.Dareus 4.Fairley 5.Clayborne Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mob16151 Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 and those all top 10 picks right? Kinda nice those kind of players at top that fit our need Meh right now they are. But someone will slide. Someone always does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thoner7 Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 Not vehement, but i'd reorder the list as such: 1.Bowers 2.Heyward 3.Dareus 4.Fairley 5.Clayborne And I would as: 1.Fairley 2.Bowers 3.Dareus 4.Clayborne 5.Heyward Bowers is prob a better play straight up than Fairley but Fairley is more a 5 tech. Heyward/Claiborne are playing themselves out of the top 10 while the other 3 are locks at this point. Heyward/Claiborne may end up falling out of rd 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1B4IDie Posted December 2, 2010 Share Posted December 2, 2010 And I would as: 1.Fairley 2.Bowers 3.Dareus 4.Clayborne 5.Heyward Bowers is prob a better play straight up than Fairley but Fairley is more a 5 tech. Heyward/Claiborne are playing themselves out of the top 10 while the other 3 are locks at this point. Heyward/Claiborne may end up falling out of rd 1. Cue Agreement Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cotton Fitzsimmons Posted December 2, 2010 Share Posted December 2, 2010 I'm not a big Auburn fan, but Fairley looks like a beast. If we committed to playing a 4-3 and put Williams and Fairley on the interior, they would do ridiculous things. From what I've seen of Fairley though, he plays on the edge and takes a lot of roughing penalties. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts