Mr. WEO Posted September 2, 2010 Share Posted September 2, 2010 (edited) Interesting contrarian point of view in SI: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/michael_rosenberg/09/02/locker/index.html?eref=sihp Edited September 2, 2010 by Mr. WEO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarolinaBill Posted September 2, 2010 Share Posted September 2, 2010 I'm going with Enderle right now, f*ck Locker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FightinIrishBills Posted September 2, 2010 Share Posted September 2, 2010 Interesting contrarian point of view in SI: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/michael_rosenberg/09/02/locker/index.html?eref=sihp Quiet down, you might disrupt the "tank the season and take Jake Locker #1 overall!!!" crowd. This article pretty much sums up my feelings on Locker. People have been falling in love with his measurables without looking at his production. He's not a great decision-maker. He can be dynamic, but he also has been known to disappear in games. It's not like the Pac-10 has been fielding SEC-level defenses (USC excepted); he should be doing better against what he's been working with. Yeah, the Huskies have been all kinds of bad, but Locker has yet to prove that he's a stud QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts