liverpoolkev Posted January 15, 2010 Share Posted January 15, 2010 Since Cowher havent said NO publicly, trust with BRANDO,OVERDORF & WILSON that personnel will be acquired looks like the stumbling point . If Cowher had a opt-out clause this will give Cowher the flexibillty to get out of a BAD situation and keep front office from going back on their promise to provide the type of help that Cowher wants ......Its a win -win in my book. THOUGHTS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nucci Posted January 15, 2010 Share Posted January 15, 2010 Since Cowher havent said NO publicly, trust with BRANDO,OVERDORF & WILSON that personnel will be acquired looks like the stumbling point . If Cowher had a opt-out clause this will give Cowher the flexibillty to get out of a BAD situation and keep front office from going back on their promise to provide the type of help that Cowher wants ......Its a win -win in my book. THOUGHTS I think you call that quitting or resigning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STLBILLS15 Posted January 15, 2010 Share Posted January 15, 2010 I think you call that quitting or resigning. +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CardinalScotts Posted January 15, 2010 Share Posted January 15, 2010 We dont want him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheLynchTrain Posted January 15, 2010 Share Posted January 15, 2010 Remember how Parcells had the opt out where he could leave and still get paid the entire contract? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts