Jump to content

Peevo

Community Member
  • Posts

    366
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Peevo

  1. I think Shopp is coached to be arrogant, and some what pretentious to his audience. It makes for good radio. You can't have every host go through the motions on every broadcast. WGR is trying to establish and expand their listenership. He said it himself, "how do you get people to listen to sports radio, make it not about sports radio." And he's absolutely correct. There's plenty of time on their show when sports isn't even close to the topic. Bulldog will talk about his wife/kids and their funny mishaps, trying to attach himself to the 40+ adult male market. I'm 21 years old, don't have kids, I don't identify with him, but I certainly can understand why most people will. Who listens to sports radio? Mostly adult men, correct? So what do you adult men like? (Speaking in pure demographic, maybe even stereotypical means) Beers, hot chicks, golf, then somewhere down the line, pop culture (movies, music, video games, etc). You can't please everybody, but I think their jobs are to entertain their base listenership. I just think the one thing that I can criticise Shopp for is his sometimes just lack of factual knowledge. He gets on callers A LOT for not having their facts straight, yet he'll say things completely wrong and pass them off as fact. (he said the Miami heat won the championship in 2004, wrong it was 2006, there are other examples, that's just what comes to mind). And back to the appeal to the demographic point, Shopp gets on the NFL a lot for their marketing techniques, that it is only for the hardcore, total fantasy football nerds, not for the traditional, "for the love of the game" sports fan. But the same is true for WGR in general. They have "ball girls." IE, hot chicks that go promote their events because they're hot. If WGR was sports for the "love of the game," they wouldn't need hot chicks just to get people to their promotions and such. Its all just appealing to one's demographic. This was a long rant, I'm out.
  2. Yeah that's probably correct. I think as more time passes, we're all getting a cold, hard lesson in the economics of "big time" sports. What's really sad, is just like any other corporation, the NFL is legally bound, per SEC law to hold no accountability to anyone other than its shareholders. Its only purpose, as a corporation, is to make profit. Not only profit, but as much profit as is humanly possible. Therefore, as PTR said, if Rogers Centre generates twice the renevue per game as it would in Buffalo, it benefits the best interest of the league proper to have all games played there. More revenue for the Bills means more revenue shared to the league. What's amazing is how the NFL still markets itself as some, "every man" league. That baseball is "America's passtime" but football is "America's game." Brilliant. Yet really, football now is truly "corporate America's game." It may be a shotty point, but anybody think that a politician could have the balls to bring Anti-Trust legislation against the NFL? Is not the National Football League a monopoly on the game, thus, preventing any successful or alternative competition? Just a thought.
×
×
  • Create New...