Oneonta Buffalo Fan

Were drafting Ngata first.

I still say he will be cut. He rejected two deals with the Bills. A clear indiction he doesn't want to play for the Bills anymore.

yes, because he was getting old. And we need some newer and younger guys in here.

$3-4 million! I doubt that. With the new deal they gain an extra $10 million to spend in signings.

He's a must when it come to special teams. He's actually a pretty good backup Strong Safety. Remember he did start I think 2 years before Milloy came to Buffalo. Wire wasn't half bad.

Don't worry this means nothing to the Bills and Bengals. By Saturday everyone will forget that they were the two teams who voted against the deal. Now we can and must focus on the rebuilding of this team.

1 vote for me on no.

I wonder why we voted against it? This will be discussed by fans tomorrow morning in the Buffalo area. This makes us look bad in the NFL now.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2360258 Finally!!

He sounds almost as good as new. Injury update: http://www.buffalobills.com/ Q's and A's with TKO update: http://www.buffalobills.com/news/news.jsp?news_id=3629

Agreed, a rookie wouldn't even come close.

"X, Y, Z Receivers The x receiver, or the split end, aligns on the weak side of the formation. The z receiver, or the flanker, aligns on the strong side of the formation, maybe a couple of steps off the line of scrimmage in the slot. The tight end functions as the y receiver, but often on passing plays functions as another wide receiver." This is the main definition of a WR. But my explanation is that the #1 WR is the player, who is the best WR from a group of wide recievers on a team, either because of his leadership hands, speed, or route running. It's confusing, but it makes sense.

Still........ http://www.nfl.com/news/story/9290952 "Low-revenue teams such as Buffalo, Cincinnati and Indianapolis say high-revenue teams -- Dallas, Washington and Philadelphia, for instance -- should contribute proportionately to the player pool because they can earn far more in non-football income such as advertising and local radio rights. Those high-revenue teams might contribute only 10 percent of their outside money compared with 50 percent or more for low-revenue teams. If there is no agreement, it would leave a number of free agents commanding far less than they thought they could get and a glutted market filled with veterans who could be cut to provide cap room. " So is being a low revenue team a good thing? I haven't quite figured this out yet.

Bruce is likely going to the Eagles, I think. Givens would be our best option at #2. If not, Antonion Bryant from the Browns.

Who are you!? That's exactly what I was thinking. Interesting, someone who has the same views on the team like me.

I'll say! Evans is better than Price in all categories. Especially in his ablitiy to catch the ball and not complaining about the team. He keeps his mouth shut.

I think that we need a veteran WR over someone from the draft who can play #2. Veterans like Moulds, can help teach our younger guys a thing or two about playing that position.

What about Antonion Bryant from the Browns? I think he's a free agent this year. He would be a half bad choice at #2.

not yet, but it could be soon.

No and no.

My guess is near $5 per gallon.

Glens Falls NY. Hear them when were out camping. Gets kind of scary too...sometimes.

Ngata, from what Espn is saying, will be pick by the Bills.

The show is that old! Wow, then they should bring that show back so they can profile unsolved mysteries over the 10 years after the show was cancelled. I wonder why it was?