Taro T
-
Posts
4,955 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Taro T
-
-
The fans can wolf down on my knob. The ones he's pandering to are a bunch of clueless jackasses who are more interested in seeking attention than improving the Bills.
50 years ago he liked football so he bought a team. How is that really relevant to the present?
And Mortenson is about the only person who's making any sense right now.
Guess what. The fans are jerks.
Yeah, I'm thrilled that paper signs are the first thing he wants to talk about. That'll really get the team moving in the right direction.....
I think it was smart for him to say that he didn't support the sign confiscation. There were a lot of people that had this confused with a 1st Am. issue that were upset about it, whether they would have brought signs in or not. One of the 1st rules of business is to not tick off nor condescend (at least blatently/overtly) to your customers.
It appears that when this PC was called for yesterday, that the status of the 3 M's would be addressed as well. Their issues were not fully resolved, so rather than just say "Tom's out", tell a joke (?), and walk away; he used the forum to tell the fans (all of the fans, not just the handful you think are jackholes) that he does appreciate their business.
-
But that would explain why Modrak will "assume more of the GM's duties" (paraphrased). It sounds like Modrak will now effectively be the GM, but Marv gets the title so he can veto anything he doesn't like.
-
-
Back in the '70's and '80's, I really liked that chant. But ever since the string of 10 years between 1st round victories whenever I hear "Ooh, aah, Sabres on the" I immediately hear in my head (and not too infrequently from the people around me) "golf course".
Let's stick with "let's go Buf-fa-lo" or the lesser "here we go Sabres, here we go, (clap, clap)".
-
-
I'm thinking 2' - 2-1/2'. It'll limit both teams' mobility while not completely eliminating their strengths.
-
Is it so difficult to put two real animals against each other? I mean really, these morons have a great idea for a show but then suck it up when it comes to filming time. Put the Rhino in with the elephant!, let the tiger and lion go at it. And would it be so hard to put a buffalo in 4 feet of water and let loose a dolphin?
I wouldn't mind seeing a dolphin vs. a buffalo, but how come you guys get the home field advantage?
-
-
If either or both lines are improved 9-7 isn't unreasonable.
-
You make a lot of good points. However, personally I think it is unfair to compare the major sports like you do.
First, the only reason there is a shootout is because points (goals) are scored at a far less frequency than in the other sports. Even though this is obvious, it's the only reason hockey does what it does. If goals were as frequent as scoring plays in football or baskets in hoops there would be no discussion. Soccer, the biggest and most popular sport in the world, doesn't even tell the teams or fans when the game is going to end in overtime. I also believe that soccer awards points for ties.
Second, hockey is the only team (in North America) that uses a point system for wins, so it's hard to say fairly that they are the only league that awards more points than they others. They are the only league that allows points at all. All others are based on percentages.
Third, your complaint that they are the only league to change the rules in the OT session is valid, but only to some degree. They are also the only league to change the rules in the middle of the game. One could counter-argue that no other league takes players off the field of play and changes the number of participants. No other league makes it unfair for one team to play with five and another with four or three.
Kelly, you have some interesting thoughts. We do appear to disagree though.
You are correct that the low number of goals scored relative to basketball is used as a justification for going to a shootout. However, if football only played a 5 minute OT there would still be games that end in a tie. As stated, I would much prefer to see the league go to one full OT session in the regular season rather than go to an abreviated OT followed by a shootout. This would only add ~1 hour to the length of a hockey game. The average hockey game used to run ~2:40. I'm not positive but it seems like they are running closer to 2:20 with the new rules, but I may be mistaken on that. Either way that would put a full 80 minute game in the 3:20-3:40 time frame in a worst case. Football and baseball games both run over 3 hours very often. Having an occasional hockey game run over 3 hours would not be a horrendous burden on the players or fans. The entity that it would be a burden on is the TV station broadcasting the game. Currently, the TV station does not sell advertising for OT nor can it easily modify its post game schedule. If the game runs an hour over, then some other show that advertising was sold for does not get shown. If the TV stations sold contigent advertising for OT it would allieviate some of the TV problems but it would not eliminate the preemption of the next show.
I expect that if teams had to play up to 80 minutes during the regular season there would be far fewer ties than there currently are, especially with the tighter enforcement of obstruction type penalties. I actually would expect most teams to have 4 or fewer ties over the course of a full season which is less than 5% of all games. I personally can live with that.
As to your point about the NHL being the only sport using points instead of winning percentage, I do not agree with it because they are both the exact same thing. They are just expressed differently. A hockey team that has a 5-5 record has 10 points and a 0.500 winning percentage. A team with a 5-4-1 record has 11 points and a 0.550 winning percentage. If an NFL team played a full 5th quarter and still was tied, if their record were 5-4-1 their winning percentage would be the exact same as the NHL team with the 5-4-1 record (0.550) and they would be 1/2 game ahead of a team with a 5-5 record and 1/2 game behind a team with a 6-4 record.
Finally, I don't consider going to 5-4 a change of the rules. It is simply a way to penalize infractions of the rules. I see it as being extremely similar to basketball's free throw. It gives the infringed team an advantage to make up for the penalized action. There are special rules for a free throw but they are consistant between the regular season and the post season. The NHL uses 2 completely separate and distinct set of rules to settle a tie in regular season vs. post season. I absolutely love playoff OT. I see going to the shootout a precursor to eliminating the 2 OT game, which will stink. (Also, technically on a technical foul isn't the only person on the court during the technical free throw the player taking the shot?)
-
many good points in your post,but one could argue that NFL overtimes haven't become "de-facto" field goal contests, except you juts have to make one to win. Its really just a coin flipping contest for the most part. Better idea would be a college style OT.The NFL doesn't resort to a field goal contest.......
One thing the NFL could do to keep the current OT format and leave its rules essentially unchanged is move the kickoff in OT to the 35 yard line.
Before they moved the kickoff to the 30, IIRC the kicking team won in OT slightly more than 50% of the time. Since, its more like the receiving team winning ~75% of the time.
-
Being a hockey "purist", I am morally opposed to the shootout. I'm not thrilled with going to 4-on-4 for OT either. There are several reasons for my opposition.
1. A shootout takes a team game and reduces it to an individual skills competition. I understand the reason they went to a shootout, TV doesn't sell advertising for OT. I would prefer the advertising model were changed - sell contingent advertising for OT rather than shorten the time OT takes to reach a winner. No other major professional team sport in NA changes the rules to settle a tie game. The NFL doesn't resort to a field goal contest, MLB doesn't resort to a home run contest, and the NBA doesn't resort to a 3 point shot contest, why should the NHL be the only one to decide ties by a skills contest?
2. With the current system where a team is guaranteed a single point for making it to OT, there is an incentive for a team to lay back and not try for the win in regulation. Now that the league is calling obstruction penalties more frequently, this is a more dangerous strategy than in the past, but it still occurs on occasion.
3. It is foolish, IMHO, to have some games worth 3 points and others worth only 2. None of the other major team sports allows this and they are correct in not giving partial points for getting to OT.
4. The biggest reason I am opposed to the shootout. It is stupid to have one set of rules for the regular season and another for the post season. There is NOTHING as exciting in ALL of sports as playoff OT hockey. Eventually, I see the NHL abandoning unlimited playoff OT and going to a shootout (probably after 1 - 20 minute OT period) due to pressure from advertisers and TV networks.
I would much rather see the NHL go to a system where all games are worth 3 points. If you win in regulation, you get 3 points. You then play a 10 or 20 minute OT (length of OT depends on whether you scrape the ice before OT or do a full resurfacing). If someone wins in OT, they get 2 points and the loser gets 1. If at the end of 80 minutes no one has scored, then each team gets 1.5 points. The NFL allows for ties after a 5th quarter, I don't see where you would have an abundance of ties at the end of 80 minutes of hockey (especially with the new obstruction penalty enforcement).
If you have to keep the ridiculous OT/shootout format, at least make the games worth 3 points across the board. A regulation win or an OT win is worth 3 points to the victor and 0 to the loser. If you go to a shootout, the winner gets 2 and the loser gets 1.
-
No suspension. Apparently Collie Campbell thought that Darcy grabbed the guy's helmet and started hitting him with it accidentally. Since he clearly has never intentionally injured an opponent (yeah right), Bettman's lap collie gave Darcy the benefit of the doubt. He was fined $2,500.
-
Their website is www.bobandtom.com
Darin is right, they are typically very funny and are constantly bringing standup comics on the show as guests.
-
-
-
Is it possible to download the radio re-broadcast of the game? I was listening to it until the 3rd period when they Sabres took the lead. This team is just never say die. I'll be going up for a game in a few weeks but until then all I have is the radio via the net. I have Direct TV also but put my $$ into the Sunday ticket. Can I purchase single Sabre games on Direct TV?
No data on the radio broadcast, but you can't pick and choose games out of the CI package. I have always found the CI package to be worth the money but know money can definitely get tight. Typically they offer a reduced price package starting in late January / February for CI.
If you do get CI you won't get the Sabres postgame show (the Shootout) except on rare occasions when the CI feed continues past the end of the game even if you have the regional sports package because it isn't on any regular regional networks (it's only on the backfeed of MSG available in WNY).
-
What are they programming nowadays? Last time I checked, MTV was running one long, constant, never-ending Spring Break wet t-shirt special. Aside from that and their awards no one ever pays attention to, do they ever show anything else?
MTv peaked with Dire Straits' "Money For Nothing" video. Since then it's been all downhill.
Close. The peak had to be the greatest (spoof of a) game show ever made - Remote Control. The greatest episode had to be the one where the 3 contestants had 1 correctly answered question at the 1st commercial break. Ken punted all 3 and finished the show with 3 people from the audience as contestants.
-
I haven't heard the CD yet, so this is just speculation, but my guess is they don't do a DVD because according to Roby some yahoo from the Sabres pitched / taped over most of the 70's game videos.
-
Bertuzzi and Doan I understand people being unhappy about. Who in their right (or left) mind thinks that Heatley doesn't belong on the team?
-
-
As I had babbled about in my original post, they were originally scheduled to open for the Pretenders until that show got cancelled. Whisper to a Scream was the only song of theirs that I ever heard on the radio.
-
-
Mickey, might it be possible that they didn't want to put those allegations in a civil court indictment to keep Padilla's "friends" from being able to get their hands on information about how information about Padilla was determined in the 1st place?
Crowd chant at Sabres games
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
There was a guy behind me at the Panther game who not only was getting into the "StP / Shoot" "chant", he also was telling his girlfriend during the Panthers pp that the Sabres needed to keep 2 guys in front of the net like Florida was doing.
Last time I checked the Sabres had the 3rd best pp and the Panthers the 24th.
Yeah, let's hope Buffalo starts emulating some of these stellar units. What a tool.