Matt in KC
-
Posts
3,044 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Matt in KC
-
-
-
They just said leg fracture, gone indefinitely!
-
Neither he nor Travis have lost a fumble all year.... I was just thinking this weekend what a contrast that was to last year. Drew too is holding on ...better than last year.
-
Kelsay did absolutely nail him in the middle of his back with the crown of his helmet just after he threw on one play. After they showed that on a replay I thought we might see a fine for Kelsay. Then again, maybe not because he doesn't have a reputation....
-
I agree. Henry's ran about how he always has. He typically would start to look good as soon as everyone else started getting tired, and seemed to get pumped up after giving and receiving some hits. He's not as smooth or elusive as WM, but his YPC is about the same I'd bet (haven't looked in a month or two).
-
Sorry the formatting sucks....
Overall, he's playing about the same as he always has (except his phenom 2002 start).
PASSING
Year Team G GS Att Comp Pct Yards YPA Lg TD Int Tkld 20+ 40+ Rate
1993 New England Patriots 13 12 429 214 49.9 2494 5.81 54 15 15 16/99 32 5 65.0
1994 New England Patriots 16 16 691 400 57.9 4555 6.59 62 25 27 22/139 52 3 73.6
1995 New England Patriots 15 15 636 323 50.8 3507 5.51 47 13 16 23/170 34 2 63.7
1996 New England Patriots 16 16 623 373 59.9 4086 6.56 84 27 15 30/190 45 3 83.7
1997 New England Patriots 16 16 522 314 60.2 3706 7.10 76 28 15 30/258 47 12 87.7
1998 New England Patriots 14 14 481 263 54.7 3633 7.55 86 20 14 36/295 50 15 80.9
1999 New England Patriots 16 16 539 305 56.6 3985 7.39 68 19 21 55/342 50 13 75.6
2000 New England Patriots 16 16 531 312 58.8 3291 6.20 59 17 13 45/264 33 4 77.3
2001 New England Patriots 2 2 66 40 60.6 400 6.06 58 2 2 5/21 4 1 75.3
2002 Buffalo Bills 16 16 610 375 61.5 4359 7.15 73 24 15 54/369 45 13 86.0
2003 Buffalo Bills 16 16 471 274 58.2 2860 6.07 54 11 12 49/371 28 2 73.0
2004 Buffalo Bills 10 10 264 148 56.1 1736 6.58 65 12 11 26/152 19 6 74.0
TOTAL 166 165 5863 3341 57.0 38612 6.59 86 213 176 391/2670 439 79 76.6
-
-
I completely agree on all counts, DC Tom, and on many of your points, ICE.
I think Losman is not ready yet, and the decision to put him in last week and not this week has to be for some less-than-obvious reason (the obvious normal reasons don't add up). Maybe they wanted to humble Losman, or maybe quiet the expected calls for Bledsoe's head after the game he "threw."
The only two straight-up explanations I can think of are 1) that the coaches actually thought Losman was ready last week, and changed their minds after they saw how poorly he performed or 2) MM is the type of coach that will only pull a QB if they are not performing well or are hurt (meaning putting JP in was more about DB than JPL).
Bledsoe played quite well today, as did his supporting cast. He always seems to do his best when challenged for his job....
-
It comes up fine for me. Do you havea private connection to the internet, or are you somewhere like school that might have it blocked? I'm glad there's a reason you need help w stats.
RUSHING
ATT YDS TD LG
W. McGahee 20 100 0 41
E. Moulds 1 12 0 12
T. Henry 2 9 0 5
D. Bledsoe 3 -2 0 0
PASSING
CP/AT YDS TD INT
D. Bledsoe 15/24 185 3 1
PUNTING
NO AVG I20 LG
B. Moorman 4 41.2 0 51
DEFENSE
T-A SCK INT FF
K. Thomas 8-2 0.0 0 0
T. McGee 7-1 1.0 1 0
L. Milloy 6-0 3.0 0 0
L. Fletcher 4-3 0.0 0 0
T. Spikes 4-3 0.0 1 0
N. Clements 3-2 0.0 0 0
J. Greer 3-0 1.0 0 0
A. Schobel 3-3 0.0 0 0
S. Adams 2-1 0.0 1 0
M. Haggan 2-1 0.0 0 0
R. Neufeld 2-1 0.0 0 0
P. Prioleau 2-0 0.0 0 0
R. Baker 1-0 0.0 0 0
A. Crowell 1-1 0.0 0 0
R. Denney 1-1 1.0 0 0
C. Kelsay 1-0 0.0 0 0
J. Peters 1-1 0.0 0 0
J. Posey 1-1 0.0 0 0
P. Williams 1-0 0.0 0 0
-
Anyone know a good stats - conversion website?
...sorry Sue, I have to tease you for this one...
-
That seemed like a weird choice to me too.
I thought the announcers and production team were consistently poor all day today, not mentioning penalties, misnaming players, and missing pertinent observations all day. (Did anyone else see that it looked like WM stepped out of bounds on that mind-blowing run?)
-
Me too! It's fun to watch our run defense, especially in short yardage situations. We've let team walk all over converting 3rd aand long passes, but the run D has been very strong almost every game.
I really hope we re-sign Pat. While he doesn't flsh the same explosiveness as Sam, he's a constant force in the middle and moves very well for a big guy.
-
http://dictionary.law.com/default2.asp?sel...ld=%7C%7C%7C%7Cself-defensen. the use of reasonable force to protect oneself or members of the family from bodily harm from the attack of an aggressor, if the defender has reason to believe he/she/they is/are in danger. Self-defense is a common defense by a person accused of assault, battery or homicide. The force used in self-defense may be sufficient for protection from apparent harm (not just an empty verbal threat) or to halt any danger from attack, but cannot be an excuse to continue the attack or use excessive force. Examples: an unarmed man punches Allen Alibi, who hits the attacker with a baseball bat. That is legitimate self-defense, but Alibi cannot chase after the attacker and shoot him or beat him senseless. If the attacker has a gun or a butcher knife and is verbally threatening, Alibi is probably warranted in shooting him. Basically, appropriate self-defense is judged on all the circumstances. Reasonable force can also be used to protect property from theft or destruction. Self-defense cannot include killing or great bodily harm to defend property, unless personal danger is also involved, as is the case in most burglaries, muggings or vandalism.
I'm actually suprised this definition of selfdefense doesn't clarify the situation better. In a law class I took (I'm not a lawyer) I remember the prof stressing that self defense has to be a lesser reaction in almost every case, and would be thrown out if another option was available (such as walking away).
-
I thought I saw him dressed. He and Ritmann both looked like they had promise in preseason. But, I was surprised they made the roster, since they looked like they'd get smoked by starters if they didn't improve significantly.
-
-
It's true, we're only 3 games out of the playoffs (if we win a tiebreaker) with 8 remaining....
I think it is as interesting to note that there are only 3 teams that have won their last 3 games or more (GB, SD, Pitt). and 2 that have lost more than the last 2 in a row (Carolina, SF). Now that's parity.
-
I too think it will be very interesting to see if they activate Peters and/or McFarland.
Has anyone been counting how many times McFarland's been active? I've been thinking he and Ritzmann are two candidates for being snuck onto the PS next year if they are still developing, instead of any draftees that will draw more attention.
For all his amazing size, speed, and hype, Peters looked pretty horrible in preseason. I hope he was just an untrained talent that can contribute in the next year or two once he gets some proper coaching. Maybe just teach him 3 or 4 different plays??
-
Mark, eball was just throwing a personality construct out there. You're not getting negative, are you?
(just teasing, I mostly agree)I'd say I'm about 50% EO and 50% TFF, but would guess anyone that remembers my (comparitively small number of)posts would say I'm an EO. I took a bet at the beginning of the year, for instance, that the Bills would surrender under 40 sacks.
-
It looked clean to me. I was surprised there weren't more booing at that call.
-
It was great to see Kelsay stepping up. I was definitely having Hansen flashbacks on a couple plays (tho Kelsay's neck is a bit shorter).
Has anyone heard from Cornhusker Bob, or whatever his name was, asking about Kelsay in the preseason?
-
I think other teams' offers will similarly be determined by their needs and the players available. If, for instance a salary-cap-strapped team has an okay RB, and no depth, TH might be a very good fit for them if the only ones in the draft look either too expensive or risky in the pros.
-
If we trade Henry for one second rounder for a third and keep the fisrt second pick we will have two first rounders ,soooo we can trade the first first rounder and keep the second for a extra third, therfore we would have two second picks for the first two rounders unableing us three third picks for nine 9th rounders,thus giving us a total of 15 picks late in the first round,which we could trade them together giving us an extra pick in the forth round, thus giving us picks in the fifth and seventh of the first five rounds which we traded Henry for in the first place,oooooor we could.............ahhh fuk it!
Smart ass. So he mistyped a bit....
I think it depends on the players out there and don't know enough whether this is going to be a deep draft in areas we need help.... If you can get the player(s) you want, then you deal (up or down). I'd be pretty psyched to have two 2nd rounders. I tend to think that skill players in the top of the first round are not worth the risk for the $$ and I'm thrilled our first rounders from the last couple years seem to have real talent.
-
Okay, so here's a different direction to take this: does anyone know if the ref's are looking at High Definition monitors when making their replay calls? It would be pretty ridiculous if they weren't, though I doubt the one(s) on the field are HD....
As far as the "might have caughta break" comment goes, I simply took that as the AP writer was covering multiple games and didn't take the time to look closely and form his own opinion. He was more commenting on the commentary at the end than the game itself.
-
Bills win by two, scoring in the last two minutes of the game. 26-24?
It should be interesting to compare the RB stats as the game goes on. My guess: WM runs for more yards than Curtis, but scores one less TD.
).
Top Free Agent available
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
TheblackBear, what do you think of volunteer firemen?